Preclinical Efficacy and Safety of VEGF-Grab, a Novel Anti-VEGF Drug, and Its Comparison to Aflibercept.

Purpose: VEGF-Grab is a novel anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) candidate drug with higher affinity to both VEGF and placental growth factor (PlGF) compared to aflibercept. We investigated the preclinical efficacy of VEGF-Grab for ophthalmic therapy and compared it to that of aflibercept. Methods: The in vitro anti-VEGF efficacy of VEGF-Grab was determined using VEGF-induced cell proliferation/migration and tube formation assays. The in vivo antiangiogenic efficacy of intravitreal injection of either VEGF-Grab or aflibercept was evaluated using murine models of ocular angiogenesis: mouse oxygen-induced retinopathy (OIR) and rat laser-induced choroidal neovascularization (CNV). The in vivo retinal toxicity in the mouse eye resulting from the injection of either drug was evaluated with light and electron microscopy. Results: VEGF-Grab showed greater inhibition of VEGF-induced cell proliferation/migration than aflibercept, but it showed comparable inhibition of tube formation in vitro. In the in vivo OIR model, VEGF-Grab showed a comparable suppression of retinal neovascularization compared to aflibercept. Additionally, VEGF-Grab showed an efficacy similar to that of aflibercept in terms of CNV inhibition in the laser-induced CNV model. Histology and transmission electron microscopy showed no significant signs of toxicity in the mouse retina at 7 and 30 days following the intravitreal injection of VEGF-Grab or aflibercept. Conclusions: Compared to aflibercept, VEGF-Grab presented comparable in vivo antiangiogenic efficacy and superior in vitro anti-VEGF activity. The retinal safety profiles were comparable for the two drugs. Considering its known higher binding affinity to VEGF and PlGF compared to aflibercept, VEGF-Grab could be a potential candidate drug for neovascular retinal diseases and an alternative to aflibercept.

Laser and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment for drusenoid pigment epithelial detachment in age-related macular degeneration.

This study aims to report the 12 months results of efficacy and safety of laser photocoagulation and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections for drusenoid pigment epithelial detachment (dPED). In this prospective study, patients with treatment naïve bilateral intermediate age-related macular degeneration, featuring dPED, with visual acuity ≤ 83 letters were enrolled. The study group received PASCAL laser (532 nm) along the periphery of the dPED, and the fellow eye served as a control group. To prevent complications of choroidal neovascularization, intravitreal anti-VEGF injections to laser treated eye were performed on a 3-month interval up to 1 year. Primary outcomes-drusen area, PED height-and secondary outcomes-best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), contrast sensitivity, degree of metamorphopsia, NEI-VFQ 25, and fundus autofluorescence-were analyzed. Among 21 patients, a total of 20 patients satisfied the 12 months follow-up. Drusen area and PED height decreased significantly in the laser group, while no significant change appeared in the control group (74.1% vs. - 3.5%, P < 0.001; 76.6% vs. 0.1%, P < 0.001). Mean BCVA improved 4.6 letters in the laser group (vs. 1.1 letters in the control group, P = 0.019). As for safety, one study eye developed retinal pigment epithelial tear, and one control eye developed retinal angiomatous proliferation. Low energy laser photocoagulation and anti-VEGF injection in eyes with dPED showed some improvement in visual acuity. dPED regressed without developing center involving GA in the study eye, but a longer term follow-up is necessary to reveal the efficacy and safety of these treatments. The 2-year results of this study will be followed to reveal long term efficacy and safety of the treatment for dPED.