Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Heart Lung ; 52: 190-193, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35063307

RESUMEN

Many surgical treatments have been described for massive subcutaneous emphysema (MSE) over the recent years. However, there is no consensus on which is the most recommended and there is great diversity in treatment. With new advances in minimally invasive therapy performed at the bedside, especially in intensive care units, it has been possible to increase therapeutic efficacy. During the COVID-19 pandemic, some therapeutic techniques have been discussed in critically ill patients with SARS-COV-2 respiratory infections, because of the potential overexposure of healthcare personnel to an increased risk of contagion after direct exposure to air trapped in the subcutaneous tissue of infected patients. We present the clinical case of an 82-year-old male patient, SARS COV-2 infected, with MSE after 48 h with invasive mechanical ventilation in critical intensive care. He was treated with negative pressure therapy (NPT) allowing effective resolution of the MSE in a short period (5 days) with a minimally invasive bedside approach, reducing the potential air exposure of health personnel by keeping the viral load retained by the emphysema. Therefore, we present NPT as an effective, minimally invasive and safe therapeutic alternative to be considered in the management of MSE in critically ill patients infected with SARS COV-2.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Enfisema Subcutáneo , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Enfisema Subcutáneo/epidemiología , Enfisema Subcutáneo/etiología , Enfisema Subcutáneo/terapia
2.
Nutrients ; 13(9)2021 Sep 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34579122

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A poor body composition (BC) has been identified as a risk factor for patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). This study was performed to assess the effect of early peripheral parenteral nutrition (PPN) on BC in patients undergoing CCR surgery within an enhanced recovery program. METHODS: Patients with normal nutritional status were prospectively included between October 2016 and September 2019, randomized into two groups (PPN with periOlimel N4-E versus conventional fluid therapy) and subsequently classified according to their preoperative CT scan into high- or low-risk BC groups. Postoperative complications and length of hospital stay (LOS) were assessed. RESULTS: Of the 156 patients analyzed, 88 patients (56.4%) were classified as having high-risk BC according to CT measurements. PPN led to a 15.4% reduction in postoperative complications in high-risk vs. 1.7% in low-risk BC patients. In the multivariate analysis, high-risk BC was related to an OR (95% CI) of 2 (p = 0.044) of presenting complications and of 1.9 (p = 0.066) for major complications, and was associated with an increase in LOS of 3.6 days (p = 0.039). CONCLUSIONS: The measurement of patients' BC can allow for the identification of target patients where PPN has been proven to be an effective tool to improve postoperative outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Composición Corporal , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Recuperación Mejorada Después de la Cirugía , Nutrición Parenteral , Cuidados Posoperatorios/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Anciano , Índice de Masa Corporal , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estado Nutricional
3.
Cir Esp (Engl Ed) ; 98(4): 178-186, 2020 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31987464

RESUMEN

Prehabilitation has a multimodal conception based on three fundamental pillars: improvement of the patient's physical condition, nutritional optimization and cognitive intervention to reduce stress and anxiety, as well as other measures such as smoking cessation and correction of anemia. The aim of prehabilitation programs is to optimize the patient from the moment of diagnosis until the surgical intervention in order to reduce postoperative complications. As in the case of multimodal rehabilitation protocols, the actions of prehabilitation programs have synergistic effects, that is, small changes that, by themselves, do not have clinical significance but when added up, they produce a significant improvement in the postoperative evolution of patients. Although more studies are required to evaluate the impact of these programs on patients groups with different pathologies, interventions and risk factors, their progressive implementation is necessary in the daily clinical practice of our patients. The objective of this narrative review is to evaluate the available evidence about prehabilitation in surgery, focusing on current established strategies, knowledge gaps and future research.


Asunto(s)
Recuperación Mejorada Después de la Cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Ejercicio Preoperatorio/fisiología , Anemia/terapia , Ansiedad/prevención & control , Composición Corporal , Capacidad Cardiovascular/fisiología , Ejercicio Físico , Humanos , Conciliación de Medicamentos , Atención Plena , Estado Nutricional , Acondicionamiento Físico Humano , Rendimiento Físico Funcional , Pruebas Psicológicas , Cese del Hábito de Fumar , Estrés Fisiológico/fisiología , Prueba de Paso
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA