RESUMEN
Maribavir (MBV), a UL97 inhibitor, shows good oral bioavailability, low host cell toxicity, and theoretical benefits to inhibit cross-resistant viruses. We herein examined clinical and virological outcomes of 12 patients, including 3 bone marrow recipients and 9 organ recipients infected with resistant cytomegalovirus (CMV) and treated with MBV during 2011-2012. All received at least 800-mg daily doses. They had developed clinical (12/12) and/or virological (11/12) resistance to CMV infection. Based on a decrease of viral load in blood >1.5 log copies/mL half of them responded to MBV treatment. The individual changes varied from a rapid decrease in viral load (n = 4) to no response (n = 3) with some late response slowly decreasing viremia (n = 3). In 2 cases MBV was used as secondary prophylaxis. No clear parameter emerged as a clinical surrogate for nonresponse to MBV. These results contrast with the lack of efficacy in phase III trials of MBV prophylaxis among stem cell recipients, which were possibly due to low doses or inadequate timing of drug initiation in the study. Additional clinical and surrogate laboratory markers are needed to determine antiviral responses to guide MBV use. Dosage ranging studies might benefit future MBV use.
Asunto(s)
Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Bencimidazoles/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Trasplante de Órganos , Ribonucleósidos/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Antivirales/farmacología , Bencimidazoles/farmacología , Citomegalovirus/efectos de los fármacos , Francia , Genotipo , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fosfotransferasas (Aceptor de Grupo Alcohol)/genética , Ribonucleósidos/farmacologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Retinaldehyde (RAL), a key metabolite between vitamin A and retinoic acid, acts by modulating differentiation and proliferation of keratinocytes, which is of interest in acne lesions, mainly retentional lesions. Glycolic acid increases the exfoliation of corneocytes explaining its mild activity on retentional lesions. Thus, RAL and glycolic acid combined in the same product (Diacneal) have complementary activities which can be of interest for acne patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the tolerance of Diacneal used by 1,709 acne patients in combination with their usual acne products except retinoids. RESULTS: This study demonstrated a very good tolerance of Diacneal when used with other acne treatments for 90 days. Complaints about side-effects were rare. Moreover, the significant decrease in both inflammatory and retentional lesions between day 0 and day 90 indicates that Diacneal could amplify the efficiency of other anti-acne products used at the same time by the patients. The subjective evaluation of the preparation's efficacy by investigators and patients was strongly favourable. CONCLUSION: These data show that a combination of RAL 0.1% and glycolic acid 6% may be used in association with other topical anti-acne treatments (benzoyl peroxide and topical antibiotics) with an excellent tolerance.