RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Many non-pharmacological interventions have been proposed for spasticity modulation in spastic stroke subjects. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the immediate effect of dry needling (DN), electrical stimulation (ES), and dry needling with intramuscular electrical stimulation (DN+IMES) on H-reflex in post-stroke spasticity. METHODS: Spastic subjects with stroke (N = 90) (55-85 years) were evaluated after 1 month of stroke onset using Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) score ≥1. Subjects were randomly allocated to receive one session of DN - Soleus (N = 30), ES - posterior lateral side of the leg with 100 Hz and 250 µs pulse width (N = 30), or DN+IMES - Soleus (N = 30). MAS, H-reflex, maximum latency, H-amplitude, M-amplitude and H/M ratio, were recorded before and after one session of intervention. Relationships for each variable within group or the difference among groups were calculated by effect size. RESULTS: Significant decrease in H/M ratio in Gastrocnemius and Soleus at post-treatment within DN group (P = .024 and P = .029, respectively), large effect size (d = 0.07 and 0.62, respectively); and DN+IMES group (P = .042 and P = .001, respectively), large effect size (d = 0.69 and 0.71, respectively). No significant differences in all variables at pre-treatment and post-treatment was recorded among ES, DN, and DN+IMES groups. Significant decrease in MAS was recorded at post-treatment compared to pre-treatment within ES group (P = .002), DN group (P = .0001), and DN+IMES group (P = .0001), but not significant (P > .05) among three groups at pre-treatment (P = .194) and post-treatment (P = .485). CONCLUSIONS: Single session of DN, ES, and the DN+IMES can significantly modulate post-stroke spasticity by possible bottom-up regulation mechanisms.
RESUMEN
Controversial findings about the effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation and functional electrical stimulation in managing spasticity have been raised after spinal cord injury. A systematic review was conducted to identify the range of the stimulation parameters that may alleviate spasticity. Three independent reviewers searched Medline (PubMed), web of knowledge, Scopus, Cochrane Central, Virtual Health Library, and Physiotherapy Evidence Database until January 2018. Inclusion criteria were applications of neuromuscular electrical stimulation/functional electrical stimulation on the lower limb muscles, stimulation parameters (frequency, pulse duration, and amplitude of current), and measures of spasticity after spinal cord injury. The primary outcome was spasticity as measured by the Modified Ashworth Scale and the secondary outcome was spasticity assessed by other indirect measures. Twenty-three clinical and nonclinical trials were included with 389 subjects. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation/functional electrical stimulation provided reductions in spasticity by 45%-60% with decrease in electromyography activity and increase in range of motion after spinal cord injury. The identified stimulation parameters were frequency of 20-30 Hz, pulse duration of 300-350 µs, and amplitude of the current greater than 100 mA. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation/functional electrical stimulation provides an effective rehabilitation strategy in managing spasticity. However, a recommendation of the stimulation parameters cannot be accurately assumed because of high variability in the methodology, design, and heterogeneity of the included studies.