Inhibitors targeting mitosis: tales of how great drugs against a promising target were brought down by a flawed rationale.

Although they have been advocated with an understandable enthusiasm, mitosis-specific agents such as inhibitors of mitotic kinases and kinesin spindle protein have not been successful clinically. These drugs were developed as agents that would build on the success of microtubule-targeting agents while avoiding the neurotoxicity that encumbers drugs such as taxanes and vinca alkaloids. The rationale for using mitosis-specific agents was based on the thesis that the clinical efficacy of microtubule-targeting agents could be ascribed to the induction of mitotic arrest. However, the latter concept, which has long been accepted as dogma, is likely important only in cell culture and rapidly growing preclinical models, and irrelevant in patient tumors, where interference with intracellular trafficking on microtubules is likely the principal mechanism of action. Here we review the preclinical and clinical data for a diverse group of inhibitors that target mitosis and identify the reasons why these highly specific, myelosuppressive compounds have failed to deliver on their promise.

Measurement of ligand binding to tubulin by sulfhydryl reactivity.

Ligand binding can induce shifts in protein conformation. In the case of tubulin, these drug-induced confirmational changes can prevent or stabilize microtubule polymerization. 5',5'-Dithiobis(2-nitrobenzoate) (DTNB) reacts with free and accessible sulfhydryls and stoichiometrically produces a detectable product, which allows an exact measurement of reacted thiols. Since binding of small ligands may alter conformational dynamics, it may also affect the reactivity of thiols on tubulin. Differences in DTNB reactivity with thiols upon ligand binding can therefore be used to deduce binding characteristics. We will describe two methods that use tubulin cysteine reactivity with DTNB in the presence of drug to define ligand-binding characteristics.