Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 32
Filtrar
Más filtros

Métodos Terapéuticos y Terapias MTCI
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 41(2): 319-324, 2022 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34657213

RESUMEN

Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were consecutively collected from patients with pneumonia in 29 medical centers in 2020 and susceptibility tested by broth microdilution method. Ceftazidime-avibactam (95.5% susceptible), imipenem-relebactam (94.3% susceptible), and ceftolozane-tazobactam (93.3% susceptible) were the most active compounds after colistin (99.5% susceptible). Susceptibility rates for the ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations (BL/BLIs) varied against isolates resistant to piperacillin-tazobactam, meropenem, imipenem, and/or ceftazidime. Ceftazidime-avibactam was the most active BL/BLI against resistant subsets from Western Europe, whereas imipenem-relebactam was slightly more active than other BL/BLIs against resistant subsets from Eastern Europe. Susceptibility rates were markedly lower in Eastern Europe than Western Europe.


Asunto(s)
Neumonía/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/tratamiento farmacológico , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efectos de los fármacos , Inhibidores de beta-Lactamasas/farmacología , Inhibidores de beta-Lactamasas/uso terapéutico , Compuestos de Azabiciclo , Ceftazidima/farmacología , Ceftazidima/uso terapéutico , Cefalosporinas , Combinación de Medicamentos , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple/efectos de los fármacos , Hospitalización , Humanos , Imipenem/farmacología , Imipenem/uso terapéutico , Júpiter , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Combinación Piperacilina y Tazobactam , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/microbiología , Tazobactam
2.
Int J Infect Dis ; 107: 69-71, 2021 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33878463

RESUMEN

The activities of dalbavancin and comparator agents were evaluated against Staphylococcus aureus isolated from the lower respiratory tract of cystic fibrosis (CF) and non-CF patients with pneumonia. Bacterial isolates (n = 357) were collected from CF patients in 36 medical centers worldwide (2018-2019) and susceptibility tested using reference broth microdilution. Susceptibility results from these isolates were compared with those for 725 S. aureus isolates consecutively collected from non-CF patients with pneumonia from the same medical centers over the same period. Only isolates determined to be the probable cause of pneumonia were included in the study. Susceptibility profiles were very similar among isolates from CF and non-CF patients. Dalbavancin exhibited potent activity (MIC50/90, 0.03/0.03 mg/L) and complete coverage (100.0% susceptibility) against isolates from CF and non-CF patients. Ceftaroline (MIC50/90, 0.25/1 mg/L) was active against 97.8% and 98.1% of isolates from CF and non-CF patients, respectively. Oxacillin resistance (MRSA) rates were 27.7% among CF and 28.7% among non-CF patients. Among MRSA isolates from CF/non-CF patients (n = 99/208), susceptibility to ceftaroline, clindamycin, levofloxacin, and tetracycline were 91.9%/93.3%, 58.6%/64.4%, 40.4%/29.3%, and 83.8%/89.4%, respectively. Dalbavancin demonstrated high potency against S. aureus from CF and non-CF patients and may represent a valuable treatment option for CF patients with MRSA pulmonary infection.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Fibrosis Quística/microbiología , Neumonía Estafilocócica/tratamiento farmacológico , Staphylococcus aureus/aislamiento & purificación , Teicoplanina/análogos & derivados , Cefalosporinas/uso terapéutico , Clindamicina/uso terapéutico , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Humanos , Levofloxacino/uso terapéutico , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/aislamiento & purificación , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Oxacilina/uso terapéutico , Neumonía Estafilocócica/microbiología , Teicoplanina/uso terapéutico , Tetraciclina/uso terapéutico , Ceftarolina
3.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 98(2): 115108, 2020 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32640386

RESUMEN

Studies evaluating large series of pediatric patients with bloodstream infections (BSIs) are scarce. We evaluated the frequency and antimicrobial susceptibility of organisms isolated from pediatric patients with BSI and therapeutic options for BSI caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) organisms. A total of 2423 organisms were consecutively collected from 33 US medical centers between 2014 and 2018, and susceptibility was tested by reference broth microdilution methods. Isolates with an extended-spectrum ß-lactamase phenotype were screened for ß-lactamase genes. Overall, 40.2% of organisms were Gram-negative bacteria, 57.0% Gram-positives, and 2.8% Candida spp. The 5 most common organisms were Staphylococcus aureus (26.0%), Escherichia coli (13.0%), coagulase-negative staphylococci (8.3%), Enterococcus faecalis (7.1%), and Klebsiella pneumoniae (6.9%). Among S. aureus, 26.0% were oxacillin-resistant and 99.8% were susceptible to ceftaroline (MIC50/90, 0.25/0.5 mg/L). Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates combined represented >85% of Gram-negative bacteria, and all isolates (100.0%) were susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam.


Asunto(s)
Bacterias/efectos de los fármacos , Bacterias/aislamiento & purificación , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológico , Sepsis/microbiología , Adolescente , Antiinfecciosos/farmacología , Compuestos de Azabiciclo/farmacología , Proteínas Bacterianas , Candida/efectos de los fármacos , Candida/aislamiento & purificación , Ceftazidima/farmacología , Cefalosporinas/farmacología , Niño , Preescolar , Combinación de Medicamentos , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Humanos , Lactante , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Oxacilina/farmacología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , beta-Lactamasas/genética , beta-Lactamasas/metabolismo , Ceftarolina
4.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32094135

RESUMEN

Nine hundred Haemophilus influenzae clinical isolates from 83 U.S. and European medical centers were tested for susceptibility by reference broth microdilution methods against ceftolozane-tazobactam and comparators. Results were stratified by ß-lactamase production and infection type. Overall, ceftolozane-tazobactam MIC50/90 values were 0.12/0.25 mg/liter, and 99.0% of isolates were inhibited at the susceptible breakpoint of ≤0.5 mg/liter; the highest MIC value was only 2 mg/liter. Our results support using ceftolozane-tazobactam to treat H. influenzae infections.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Cefalosporinas/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Haemophilus/tratamiento farmacológico , Haemophilus influenzae/efectos de los fármacos , Tazobactam/uso terapéutico , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple/genética , Europa (Continente) , Haemophilus influenzae/genética , Haemophilus influenzae/aislamiento & purificación , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Estados Unidos
5.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32094137

RESUMEN

Plazomicin was active against 97.0% of 8,783 Enterobacterales isolates collected in the United States (2016 and 2017), and only 6 isolates carried 16S rRNA methyltransferases conferring resistance to virtually all aminoglycosides. Plazomicin (89.2% to 95.9% susceptible) displayed greater activity than amikacin (72.5% to 78.6%), gentamicin (30.4% to 45.9%), and tobramycin (7.8% to 22.4%) against carbapenem-resistant and extensively drug-resistant isolates. The discrepancies among the susceptibility rates for these agents was greater when applying breakpoints generated using the same stringent contemporary methods applied to determine plazomicin breakpoints.


Asunto(s)
Aminoglicósidos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Enterobacteriaceae Resistentes a los Carbapenémicos/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/microbiología , Enterobacteriaceae/efectos de los fármacos , Sisomicina/análogos & derivados , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana/genética , Enterobacteriaceae/genética , Hospitales , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , ARN Ribosómico 16S/genética , Sisomicina/farmacología , Estados Unidos
6.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 74(Suppl 3): iii35-iii41, 2019 04 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30949705

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Lefamulin is a semi-synthetic intravenous (iv) and oral pleuromutilin antibiotic active against community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) pathogens. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target attainment analyses were carried out to evaluate lefamulin 150 mg iv q12h and 600 mg orally q12h under fed and fasted conditions for the treatment of patients with CABP. METHODS: The analyses undertaken used a population PK model based on Phase 1 PK data, non-clinical PK/PD targets for efficacy and in vitro surveillance data for Streptococcus pneumoniae (SP) and Staphylococcus aureus (SA), and Monte Carlo simulation. Percentage probabilities of PK/PD target attainment by MIC on day 1 were determined using median total-drug epithelial lining fluid (ELF) and free-drug plasma AUC:MIC ratio targets associated with 1 and 2 log10 cfu reductions from baseline. RESULTS: Percentage probabilities of attaining the total-drug ELF AUC:MIC ratio target for a 1 log10 cfu reduction from baseline for SP were ≥99.2% at the MIC90 of 0.12 mg/L and 96.7%, 82.1% and 96.3% for iv and oral dosing regimens under fed and fasted conditions, respectively, at the MIC99 of 0.25 mg/L. Percentage probabilities of attaining the free-drug plasma AUC:MIC target for the same endpoint at the SP MIC99 were 100% for each regimen. For the SA MIC90 of 0.12 mg/L and AUC:MIC ratio targets for the same endpoint, percentage probabilities were 92.7%-100% for iv and oral dosing regimens. CONCLUSIONS: These data provide support for lefamulin 150 mg iv q12h and 600 mg orally q12h for the treatment of patients with CABP and suggest that doses may not need to be taken under fasted conditions.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Bacterias/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/tratamiento farmacológico , Simulación por Computador , Diterpenos/farmacocinética , Compuestos Policíclicos/farmacocinética , Tioglicolatos/farmacocinética , Administración Intravenosa , Administración Oral , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Diterpenos/administración & dosificación , Ayuno , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Modelos Estadísticos , Método de Montecarlo , Neumonía Bacteriana/tratamiento farmacológico , Compuestos Policíclicos/administración & dosificación , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Staphylococcus aureus/efectos de los fármacos , Streptococcus pneumoniae/efectos de los fármacos , Tioglicolatos/administración & dosificación
7.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30670415

RESUMEN

Lefamulin, the first semisynthetic pleuromutilin antibacterial for intravenous and oral treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP), and comparators were evaluated for in vitro activity against a global collection of pathogens commonly causing CABP (n = 8595) from the 2015 and 2016 SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program. Lefamulin was highly active against the pathogens Streptococcus pneumoniae, including multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant strains (MIC50/90 for total and resistant subsets, 0.06/0.12 µg/ml; 100% inhibited at ≤1 µg/ml), Staphylococcus aureus, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA; both MIC50/90, 0.06/0.12 µg/ml; 99.8% and 99.6% inhibited at ≤1 µg/ml, respectively), Haemophilus influenzae (MIC50/90, 0.5/1 µg/ml; 93.8% inhibited at ≤1 µg/ml), and Moraxella catarrhalis (MIC50/90, 0.06/0.12 µg/ml; 100% inhibited at ≤0.25 µg/ml), and its activity was unaffected by resistance to other antibacterial classes.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/tratamiento farmacológico , Diterpenos/uso terapéutico , Neumonía Bacteriana/tratamiento farmacológico , Compuestos Policíclicos/uso terapéutico , Tioglicolatos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/microbiología , Infecciones por Haemophilus/tratamiento farmacológico , Haemophilus influenzae/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/efectos de los fármacos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Moraxella catarrhalis/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones por Moraxellaceae/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Neumocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía Bacteriana/microbiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Streptococcus pneumoniae/efectos de los fármacos
8.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30670418

RESUMEN

This study investigated the molecular mechanisms possibly associated with non-wild-type MICs for lefamulin among staphylococci and streptococci included in the lefamulin surveillance program from 2015 to 2016. A total of 2,919 Staphylococcus aureus, 276 coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), 3,923 Streptococcus pneumoniae, 389 ß-hemolytic, and 178 viridans group streptococci isolates were included in the surveillance studies. Eleven (0.3% of all S. aureus) S. aureus isolates with lefamulin MICs above the staphylococcal epidemiological cutoff (ECOFF) value (>0.25 µg/ml) were selected for this study. Eight (72.7%) S. aureus (lefamulin MIC, 0.5 to 4 µg/ml) isolates carried vga(A or E), one isolate (MIC, 32 µg/ml) carried lsa(E), one isolate (MIC, 16 µg/ml) had an alteration in L4, and one strain (MIC, 0.5 µg/ml) did not carry any of the investigated resistance mechanisms. A total of 14 (5.1% of all CoNS) CoNS isolates had lefamulin MICs (0.5 to >32 µg/ml) above the ECOFF. Similar to S. aureus, 8 (57.1%) CoNS (lefamulin MIC, 1 to 8 µg/ml) isolates carried vga(A or B), while 2 isolates (MIC, 4 to 32 µg/ml) carried cfr High genetic diversity was observed among staphylococci, although 3 S. aureus isolates belonged to sequence type 398 (ST398). Among the 3 Streptococcus agalactiae and 3 viridans group streptococci (0.1% of all streptococci surveyed) isolates selected for additional characterization, all but 1 isolate carried lsa(E). This study documents a low occurrence of surveillance isolates exhibiting a non-wild-type MIC for lefamulin, and among these isolates, vga and lsa(E) prevailed in staphylococci and streptococci, respectively.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Diterpenos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Neumocócicas/epidemiología , Compuestos Policíclicos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Staphylococcus aureus/efectos de los fármacos , Streptococcus agalactiae/efectos de los fármacos , Streptococcus pneumoniae/efectos de los fármacos , Tioglicolatos/uso terapéutico , Transportadoras de Casetes de Unión a ATP/genética , Proteínas Bacterianas/genética , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Infecciones Neumocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Neumocócicas/microbiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Staphylococcus aureus/aislamiento & purificación , Streptococcus agalactiae/aislamiento & purificación , Streptococcus pneumoniae/aislamiento & purificación
9.
Microb Drug Resist ; 25(6): 938-943, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30694735

RESUMEN

Tedizolid activity was compared with other agents with oral and intravenous formulations against community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA). Tedizolid (MIC50/90, 0.12/0.12 mg/L; 100.0% susceptible) was the most potent agent tested against CA-MRSA and subsets from adult and pediatric patients. Tedizolid minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were twofold to fourfold lower than daptomycin (MIC50/90, 0.25/0.5 mg/L; 99.9-100% susceptible) and fourfold to eightfold lower than linezolid (MIC50/90, 1/1 mg/L; 100.0% susceptible), ceftaroline (MIC50/90, 0.5-1/1 mg/L; 96.6-98.8% susceptible), and vancomycin (MIC50/90, 0.5-1/1 mg/L; 100.0% susceptible) against CA-MRSA and subsets. Clindamycin resistance rates among CA-MRSA from pediatric and adult patients were 18.3-19.1% (13.4-14.2% constitutive, 4.9-6.4% inducible) and 36.2-37.6% (29.8-30.1% constitutive, 6.4-7.5% inducible), respectively. Tetracycline (90.4-96.4% susceptible) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (96.2-100.0% susceptible) were active against CA-MRSA or subsets, whereas erythromycin (83.8-89.4% nonsusceptible) and levofloxacin (50.2-70.8% nonsusceptible) had limited activities. Tedizolid had MIC50/90 values of 0.12/0.12 mg/L against CA-MRSA showing clindamycin constitutive-resistance and recovered from adult or pediatric patients. Tedizolid had potent activities against CA-MRSA, regardless of clindamycin phenotype or patient population. Tedizolid may be considered for the treatment of ABSSSI in adults. Further studies are warranted for the clinical development in the pediatric population.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/tratamiento farmacológico , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/efectos de los fármacos , Meticilina/uso terapéutico , Oxazolidinonas/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Tetrazoles/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/microbiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana/métodos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Estados Unidos
10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30617092

RESUMEN

Omadacycline is a derivative of minocycline and the first agent of the aminomethylcycline class. A total of 3,282 organisms (1 per patient) were consecutively collected from patients hospitalized in China (including Hong Kong) and Taiwan. Susceptibility testing was performed by broth microdilution methods in a central laboratory (JMI Laboratories). The collection included Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms from patients with pneumonia, bloodstream, skin, community-acquired respiratory, and other infections. Omadacycline was very potent against Staphylococcus aureus (n = 689; MIC50/90, 0.12/0.25 mg/liter), including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA; n = 299; MIC50/90, 0.12/0.5 mg/liter), and had similar activity across geographic regions. Omadacycline was very active against Streptococcus pneumoniae (highest MIC, 0.25 mg/liter), ß-hemolytic streptococci (highest MIC, 1 mg/liter), viridans group streptococci (highest MIC, 0.25 mg/liter), and Enterococcus spp. (highest MIC, 0.5 mg/liter) from all geographic regions. Overall, 53.8% of S. pneumoniae isolates were penicillin resistant (penicillin MIC, ≥2 mg/liter) and 10.7% of enterococci (21.2% among E. faecium isolates) were vancomycin resistant. Omadacycline was active against Haemophilus influenzae (MIC50/90, 0.5/1 mg/liter) regardless of ß-lactamase production and was active against Moraxella catarrhalis (MIC50/90, ≤0.12/0.25 mg/liter). Against Enterobacteriaceae, omadacycline was most active against Escherichia coli (MIC50/90, 1/2 mg/liter), Klebsiella oxytoca (MIC50/90, 1/4 mg/liter), and Enterobacter cloacae (MIC50/90, 2/4 mg/liter). Omadacycline had potent in vitro activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens isolated from China and Taiwan and retained activity against problem pathogens, such as MRSA, vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae (PRSPN), and extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing E. coli The observed MIC profile in Chinese isolates was very similar to that seen in the U.S. and European surveillance studies.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Bacterianas/tratamiento farmacológico , Tetraciclinas/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Bacterianas/microbiología , China , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/microbiología , Enterobacteriaceae/efectos de los fármacos , Enterobacteriaceae/aislamiento & purificación , Enterococcus faecium/efectos de los fármacos , Enterococcus faecium/aislamiento & purificación , Haemophilus influenzae/efectos de los fármacos , Haemophilus influenzae/aislamiento & purificación , Hong Kong , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/microbiología , Infecciones Cutáneas Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Staphylococcus aureus/efectos de los fármacos , Staphylococcus aureus/aislamiento & purificación , Streptococcus pneumoniae/efectos de los fármacos , Streptococcus pneumoniae/aislamiento & purificación , Taiwán
11.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 92(1): 69-74, 2018 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29789189

RESUMEN

A total of 18,656 Enterobacteriaceae and 4,175 Pseudomonas aeruginosa were consecutively collected from 85 US hospitals and tested for susceptibility by broth microdilution methods in a central monitoring laboratory (JMI Laboratories). The antimicrobial susceptibility and frequency of key resistance phenotypes were assessed and stratified by infection type as follows: bloodstream (BSI; 3,434 isolates; 15.0%), pneumonia (6,439; 28.2%), skin and skin structure (SSSI; 4,134; 18.1%), intra-abdominal (IAI; 951; 4.2%), and urinary tract (UTI; 7,873; 34.5%). Ceftazidime-avibactam was active against 99.9% to 100.0% of Enterobacteriaceae and 97.0% (pneumonia) to 99.4% (UTI) of P. aeruginosa isolates. Susceptibility rates were consistently lower for ß-lactams, such as ceftazidime (82.3% vs. 87.1-90.8%), piperacillin-tazobactam (87.5% vs. 90.2-95.6%), and meropenem (96.8% vs. 98.4-99.4%) among Enterobacteriaceae from pneumonia compared to other infection types. Susceptibility to gentamicin was also generally lower among isolates from pneumonia, whereas susceptibility to levofloxacin and colistin were lowest among BSI and SSSI isolates, respectively. The occurrence of multidrug-resistance (MDR; 8.2% overall), extensively drug-resistance (XDR; 1.1% overall), and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE; 1.3% overall) phenotypes were markedly higher among isolates from patients with pneumonia compared to other infection types. Among P. aeruginosa, susceptibility rates for ceftazidime, piperacillin-tazobactam, and gentamicin were lowest among isolates from pneumonia, whereas susceptibility to meropenem was similar among isolates from BSI, pneumonia, and IAI (77.3-77.9%), and susceptibility to levofloxacin was markedly lower among UTI isolates (67.1%). The frequencies of P. aeruginosa isolates with MDR and XDR phenotypes were highest among isolates from patients with pneumonia.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/tratamiento farmacológico , Enterobacteriaceae/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/tratamiento farmacológico , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efectos de los fármacos , Compuestos de Azabiciclo/uso terapéutico , Ceftazidima/uso terapéutico , Colistina/uso terapéutico , Infección Hospitalaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Combinación de Medicamentos , Humanos , Meropenem , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana/métodos , Ácido Penicilánico/análogos & derivados , Ácido Penicilánico/uso terapéutico , Piperacilina/uso terapéutico , Combinación Piperacilina y Tazobactam , Tienamicinas/uso terapéutico , Estados Unidos
12.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 51(4): 608-611, 2018 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29277526

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Osteomyelitis is a difficult-to-treat infection that regularly involves prolonged use of systemic antibiotics. Dalbavancin has demonstrated activity against Gram-positive isolates, and has been considered as a candidate for the treatment of osteomyelitis in adults and children. This study evaluated the activity of dalbavancin against pathogens isolated from bone and joint infections (BJI). METHODS: Eight hundred and one Staphylococcus aureus, 160 coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), 164 ß-haemolytic streptococci (BHS), 82 Enterococcus faecalis and 45 viridans group streptococci (VGS) causing BJI were collected consecutively (2011-2016) and tested for susceptibility by broth microdilution methods. RESULTS: S. aureus (64.0%) was the most common pathogen associated with BJI, followed by BHS (13.1%) and CoNS (12.8%). All S. aureus (33.3% meticillin-resistant) isolates were susceptible to dalbavancin, linezolid and vancomycin, while daptomycin and clindamycin showed susceptibility rates of 99.5% and 89.0%, respectively. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) results for dalbavancin were at least eight-fold lower than these comparators against all S. aureus. Dalbavancin was the most potent agent against CoNS (63.1% meticillin-resistant), followed by daptomycin, linezolid and vancomycin. All E. faecalis isolates were inhibited by dalbavancin at ≤0.25 mg/L (US Food and Drug Administration susceptibility breakpoint), except for three vancomycin-resistant isolates. High susceptibility rates for ampicillin (98.8%), daptomycin (100.0%), linezolid (100.0%) and vancomycin (95.1%) were obtained against E. faecalis. Dalbavancin was very active against BHS (MIC90 ≤0.03 µg/mL), and was the most active agent against VGS (highest MIC ≤0.06 mg/L). Ceftriaxone, daptomycin and vancomycin were also active (93.3-100.0% susceptible) against VGS, whereas clindamycin (84.4% susceptible) had marginal activity. CONCLUSION: Dalbavancin appears to be a viable candidate for treating BJI/osteomyelitis caused by Gram-positive cocci.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Enterococcus faecalis/efectos de los fármacos , Osteomielitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Staphylococcus aureus/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Teicoplanina/análogos & derivados , Estreptococos Viridans/efectos de los fármacos , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Enterococcus faecalis/aislamiento & purificación , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Osteomielitis/microbiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Staphylococcus aureus/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/microbiología , Teicoplanina/uso terapéutico , Estados Unidos , Estreptococos Viridans/aislamiento & purificación
13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29263073

RESUMEN

The activities of ceftolozane-tazobactam and comparator agents against organisms deemed to be the cause of pneumonia among patients hospitalized in the United States during 2013 to 2015 were evaluated. Organisms included 1,576 Pseudomonas aeruginosa and 2,362 Enterobacteriaceae isolates susceptibility tested using reference broth microdilution methods. Ceftolozane-tazobactam, cefepime, ceftazidime, meropenem, and piperacillin-tazobactam inhibited 96.3%, 84.8%, 83.5%, 80.0%, and 78.6%, respectively, of the P. aeruginosa isolates. Ceftolozane-tazobactam inhibited 77.5 to 85.1% of isolates nonsusceptible to antipseudomonal ß-lactams and 86.6% and 71.0% of the 372 (23.6% overall) multidrug- and 155 (9.8%) extensively drug-resistant isolates tested. The activity of this combination was greater than those of other ß-lactams evaluated against P. aeruginosa groups across all U.S. census divisions. Ceftolozane-tazobactam was active against 90.6% of the Enterobacteriaceae, being less active than only meropenem (95.6% susceptible) among the ß-lactams evaluated. Against 145 Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates carrying extended-spectrum-ß-lactamase (ESBL)-encoding genes without carbapenemases, ceftolozane-tazobactam inhibited 82.8% of these isolates and was more active than cefepime and piperacillin-tazobactam (15.2% and 74.3% susceptible, respectively). ESBL genes included in this analysis were mainly blaCTX-M-15-like (89 isolates) and blaCTX-M-14-like (22) genes but also blaSHV (31) and blaTEM (3). Ceftolozane-tazobactam also displayed activity (84.6% susceptible) against 13 isolates harboring acquired AmpC genes. All ß-lactams displayed limited activity against blaKPC-carrying isolates. Ceftolozane-tazobactam was the most active ß-lactam tested against P. aeruginosa isolates from isolates that were the probable cause of pneumonia and displayed in vitro activity against Enterobacteriaceae, including isolates resistant to cephalosporins and carrying ESBL genes.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Cefalosporinas/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/tratamiento farmacológico , Enterobacteriaceae/efectos de los fármacos , Neumonía Bacteriana/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/tratamiento farmacológico , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efectos de los fármacos , Tazobactam/uso terapéutico , Cefepima/uso terapéutico , Ceftazidima/uso terapéutico , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple/genética , Enterobacteriaceae/enzimología , Enterobacteriaceae/genética , Enterobacteriaceae/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/epidemiología , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/microbiología , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/patología , Expresión Génica , Hospitalización , Humanos , Isoenzimas/genética , Isoenzimas/metabolismo , Meropenem/uso terapéutico , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Combinación Piperacilina y Tazobactam/uso terapéutico , Plásmidos/química , Plásmidos/metabolismo , Neumonía Bacteriana/epidemiología , Neumonía Bacteriana/microbiología , Neumonía Bacteriana/patología , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/epidemiología , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/microbiología , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/patología , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/enzimología , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/genética , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/aislamiento & purificación , Sistema Respiratorio/efectos de los fármacos , Sistema Respiratorio/microbiología , Sistema Respiratorio/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , beta-Lactamasas/genética , beta-Lactamasas/metabolismo
14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28630196

RESUMEN

We evaluated trends in Staphylococcus aureus antimicrobial susceptibility in U.S. hospitals in the 2010-2016 period. A total of 21,056 clinical isolates from 42 medical centers were tested for susceptibility by broth microdilution methods. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) rates decreased from 50.0% (in 2010) to 42.2% (in 2016). Susceptibility to erythromycin, levofloxacin, and clindamycin increased slightly, whereas susceptibility to ceftaroline, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and tetracycline remained stable. Ceftaroline retained potent activity against methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) and MRSA (97.2% susceptible) with no marked variations.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Cefalosporinas/uso terapéutico , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones Cutáneas Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Clindamicina/uso terapéutico , Eritromicina/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Levofloxacino/uso terapéutico , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/aislamiento & purificación , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana/tendencias , Infecciones Cutáneas Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Tetraciclina/uso terapéutico , Combinación Trimetoprim y Sulfametoxazol/uso terapéutico , Estados Unidos , Ceftarolina
15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28069649

RESUMEN

Bacterial isolates were collected from patients hospitalized with pneumonia (PHP), including ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), from 76 U.S. medical centers in 2011 to 2015. The Gram-negative organisms (n = 11,185, including 1,097 from VAP) were tested for susceptibility to ceftazidime-avibactam and comparators by the broth microdilution method. ß-Lactamase-encoding genes were screened using a microarray-based assay on selected isolates. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella spp. were the most common Gram-negative bacteria isolated from PHP and VAP. Ceftazidime-avibactam was very active against P. aeruginosa (n = 3,402; MIC50/MIC90, 2 and 4 µg/ml; 96.6% susceptible), including isolates nonsusceptible to meropenem (86.3% susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam), piperacillin-tazobactam (85.6% susceptible), or ceftazidime (80.6% susceptible). Ceftazidime-avibactam was also highly active against Enterobacteriaceae (MIC50/MIC90, 0.12 and 0.5 µg/ml; 99.9% susceptible), including carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) (n = 189; MIC50/MIC90, 0.5 and 2 µg/ml; 98.0% susceptible) and multidrug-resistant (MDR) (n = 674; MIC50/MIC90, 0.25 and 1 µg/ml; 98.8% susceptible) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) (n = 156; MIC50/MIC90, 0.5 and 2 µg/ml; 98.1% susceptible) Enterobacteriaceae isolates, as well as Klebsiella species isolates showing an extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL) screening-positive phenotype (n = 433; MIC50/MIC90, 0.25 and 1 µg/ml; 99.5% susceptible). Among Enterobacter spp. (24.8% ceftazidime nonsusceptible), 99.8% of the isolates, including 99.4% of ceftazidime-nonsusceptible isolates, were susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam. The most common ß-lactamases detected among Klebsiella pneumoniae and E. coli isolates were K. pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-like and CTX-M-15, respectively. Only 8 of 6,209 Enterobacteriaceae isolates (0.1%) were ceftazidime-avibactam nonsusceptible, three NDM-1-producing strains with ceftazidime-avibactam MIC values of >32 µg/ml and five isolates with ceftazidime-avibactam MIC values of 16 µg/ml and negative results for all ß-lactamases tested. Susceptibility rates among isolates from VAP were generally similar or slightly higher than those from all PHP.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Compuestos de Azabiciclo/uso terapéutico , Ceftazidima/uso terapéutico , Klebsiella/efectos de los fármacos , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efectos de los fármacos , Staphylococcus aureus/efectos de los fármacos , Centros Médicos Académicos , Combinación de Medicamentos , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple/genética , Expresión Génica , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Klebsiella/enzimología , Klebsiella/genética , Klebsiella/crecimiento & desarrollo , Infecciones por Klebsiella/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Klebsiella/epidemiología , Infecciones por Klebsiella/microbiología , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Ácido Penicilánico/análogos & derivados , Ácido Penicilánico/uso terapéutico , Piperacilina/uso terapéutico , Combinación Piperacilina y Tazobactam , Neumonía Bacteriana/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía Bacteriana/epidemiología , Neumonía Bacteriana/microbiología , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/epidemiología , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/microbiología , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/epidemiología , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/microbiología , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/enzimología , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/genética , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/crecimiento & desarrollo , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Staphylococcus aureus/enzimología , Staphylococcus aureus/genética , Staphylococcus aureus/crecimiento & desarrollo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , beta-Lactamasas/genética , beta-Lactamasas/metabolismo
16.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 60(8): 4770-7, 2016 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27216075

RESUMEN

Among 15,588 Enterobacteriaceae isolates collected in 63 U.S. hospitals from 2012 to 2014, 2,129 (13.7%) displayed an extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL) phenotype. These rates were similar over time (13.2 to 13.9%); however, differences among Escherichia coli (12.7 and 15.1% in 2012 and 2014; P = 0.007) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (18.9 and 15.5% in 2012 and 2014; P = 0.006) were noted when comparing 2014 and 2012. Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) (2.3 and 1.8%) and carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae (6.8 and 5.1%; P = 0.003) rates were lower in 2014 than in 2012. Isolates carrying blaCTX-M-15-like genes were stable (42.1 to 42.4%), but a decrease among E. coli isolates (59.1 and 49.7%; P = 0.008) and an increase among K. pneumoniae isolates (32.7 and 41.2%; P = 0.022) in 2014 were observed. Isolates carrying blaKPC (304) decreased over the years (16.5 and 10.9%; P = 0.008), mainly due to the decrease in K. pneumoniae isolates harboring blaKPC (n = 285; 35.6 and 28.4%; P = 0.041) in hospitals in the Mid-Atlantic and South Atlantic regions, where these isolates were highly prevalent during 2012 and 2013. Isolates carrying blaCMY-2-like and blaCTX-M-14-like genes increased (8.2 and 11.9% and 9.1 and 12.9%, respectively; P = 0.04 for both), and those producing blaSHV ESBL decreased (24.9 and 12.7%; P < 0.001) over the studied years, due to a decreased occurrence of the enzymes among K. pneumoniae isolates. Other enzymes were detected in smaller numbers of isolates, including four K. pneumoniae isolates carrying blaNDM-1 metallo-ß-lactamase (two in 2012 and two in 2014). Ceftazidime-avibactam, a recently approved ß-lactamase inhibitor combination, was very active against the ESBL phenotype isolates (MIC50/90, 0.12 and 1 µg/ml; 99.7% susceptible) and CRE strains (MIC50/90, 0.5 and 2 µg/ml; 98.5% susceptible) that displayed elevated MIC values for many comparator agents. In conclusion, significant changes were noted in the frequencies of isolates harboring various ß-lactamases among U.S. hospitals between 2012 and 2014 that will require continued monitoring.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Compuestos de Azabiciclo/uso terapéutico , Ceftazidima/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/tratamiento farmacológico , Enterobacteriaceae/efectos de los fármacos , Enterobacteriaceae/genética , beta-Lactamasas/genética , Carbapenémicos/uso terapéutico , Combinación de Medicamentos , Hospitales , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana/métodos , Inhibidores de beta-Lactamasas/uso terapéutico
17.
Surg Infect (Larchmt) ; 17(4): 473-8, 2016 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27104633

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Ceftazidime-avibactam is ceftazidime combined with the novel non-ß-lactam ß-lactamase inhibitor avibactam, which inhibits Ambler class A (e.g., extended-spectrum ß-lactamase [ESBL] and KPC), class C, and some class D enzymes. We evaluated the activity of ceftazidime-avibactam against aerobic gram negative bacteria causing intra-abdominal infections (IAI). METHODS: A total of 1,540 isolates were collected, one each from patient, with IAI in 57 United States hospitals in 2012-2014. Susceptibility testing was performed by reference broth microdilution methods, and Enterobacteriaceae isolates with an ESBL phenotype were evaluated by a microarray-based assay for the presence of genes encoding the CTX-M, TEM, SHV, KPC, NDM, and transferable AmpC enzymes. RESULTS: All Escherichia coli isolates were susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam, whereas the susceptibility rates for meropenem, piperacillin-tazobactam, and gentamicin were 99.8%, 93.6%, and 85.5%, respectively. Among Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates, the highest ceftazidime-avibactam minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) value was only 2 mcg/mL (MIC50/90 0.12/0.25 mcg/mL; 100% susceptible), whereas susceptibility rates to meropenem and gentamicin were 94.5% and 91.9%, respectively. The ESBL-phenotype rates among E. coli and K. pneumoniae were 15.8% and 13.3%, respectively. Overall, only one Enterobacteriaceae isolate (Enterobacter cloacae) was not susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam and had negative results for all ß-lactamases tested. Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, ceftazidime-avibactam (MIC50/90 2/4 mcg/mL; 97.1% susceptible) and amikacin (MIC50/90 2/8 mcg/mL; 99.0% susceptible) were the most active compounds, and ceftazidime-avibactam retained activity against many meropenem-non-susceptible (88.6% susceptible) and piperacillin-tazobactam-non-susceptible (82.9% susceptible) strains. CONCLUSION: Ceftazidime-avibactam coverage (98.7% inhibited at ≤8 mcg/mL) of intra-abdominal infection pathogens was greater than that observed for meropenem (95.7% susceptible) and piperacillin-tazobactam (88.4% susceptible).


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Compuestos de Azabiciclo/uso terapéutico , Ceftazidima/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Intraabdominales/tratamiento farmacológico , Combinación de Medicamentos , Bacterias Aerobias Gramnegativas/efectos de los fármacos , Bacterias Aerobias Gramnegativas/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/epidemiología , Humanos , Infecciones Intraabdominales/epidemiología , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
18.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 60(7): 4355-60, 2016 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27114273

RESUMEN

A total of 7,272 unique patient clinical isolates were collected from 71 U.S. medical centers from patients with urinary tract infections in 2012 to 2014 and tested for susceptibility to ceftazidime-avibactam and comparators by broth microdilution methods. Ceftazidime-avibactam inhibited >99.9% of all Enterobacteriaceae at the susceptible breakpoint of ≤8 µg/ml (there were only three nonsusceptible strains). Ceftazidime-avibactam was also active against Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates (MIC50, 2 µg/ml; MIC90, 4 µg/ml; 97.7% susceptible), including many isolates not susceptible to meropenem, ceftazidime, and/or piperacillin-tazobactam.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Compuestos de Azabiciclo/uso terapéutico , Ceftazidima/uso terapéutico , Bacterias Gramnegativas/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones Urinarias/microbiología , Enterobacteriaceae/efectos de los fármacos , Enterobacteriaceae/genética , Enterobacteriaceae/patogenicidad , Bacterias Gramnegativas/genética , Bacterias Gramnegativas/patogenicidad , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efectos de los fármacos , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/genética , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/patogenicidad
19.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 47(3): 235-42, 2016 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26920105

RESUMEN

The activities of the novel ß-lactam/non-ß-lactam ß-lactamase inhibitor combination ceftazidime/avibactam and comparators were evaluated against isolates from pneumonia in hospitalised patients including ventilated patients (PHP, pneumonia not designated as VABP; VABP, pneumonia in ventilated patients). Isolates were from the European-Mediterranean region (EuM), China and the USA collected in the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program between 2009 and 2011 inclusive. A total of 2393 organisms from PHP were from the EuM, 888 from China and 3213 from the USA; from VABP patients there were 918, 97 and 692 organisms collected, respectively. Among Enterobacteriaceae from PHP, ceftazidime/avibactam MIC90 values against Escherichia coli ranged from 0.25-0.5mg/L and Klebsiella spp. MIC90 values were 0.5mg/L in each region. Among VABP isolates, MIC90 values for ceftazidime/avibactam against E. coli were 0.25mg/L; for Klebsiella spp. from VABP patients, MIC90 values were similar to those obtained against PHP isolates. The MIC of ceftazidime/avibactam was ≤8mg/L against 92-96% of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from PHP patients. Isolates of P. aeruginosa from VABP patients were of lower susceptibility to all antibacterial agents (e.g. depending on region, meropenem susceptibilities were 51.2-69.4% in contrast to 68.3-76.7% among PHP patients). However, ceftazidime/avibactam inhibited 79.2-95.4% of VABP isolates at an MIC of ≤8mg/L. Acinetobacter spp. were resistant to many agents and only rates of susceptibility to colistin were >90% across all regions both for PHP and VABP isolates. Ceftazidime/avibactam was generally active against a high proportion of isolates resistant to ceftazidime from PHP and VAPB patients.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Compuestos de Azabiciclo/uso terapéutico , Ceftazidima/uso terapéutico , Bacterias Gramnegativas/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía Bacteriana/tratamiento farmacológico , Infección Hospitalaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Bacterias Gramnegativas/aislamiento & purificación , Hospitalización , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Respiración Artificial
20.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 59(1): 702-6, 2015 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25348529

RESUMEN

Telavancin had MIC50 and MIC90 values of 0.03 and 0.06 µg/ml (100.0% susceptible), respectively, against methicillin-resistant and -susceptible Staphylococcus aureus. Telavancin was active against vancomycin-susceptible Enterococcus faecalis (MIC50/90, 0.12/0.12 µg/ml; 100% susceptible) and Enterococcus faecium (MIC50/90, 0.03/0.06 µg/ml), while higher MIC values were obtained against vancomycin-resistant E. faecium (MIC50/90, 1/2 µg/ml) and E. faecalis (MIC50/90, >2/>2 µg/ml). Streptococci showed telavancin modal MIC results of ≤ 0.015 µg/ml, except against Streptococcus agalactiae (i.e., 0.03 µg/ml). This study reestablishes the telavancin spectrum of activity against isolates recovered from the United States (2011-2012) using the revised broth microdilution method.


Asunto(s)
Aminoglicósidos/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infección Hospitalaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/tratamiento farmacológico , Aminoglicósidos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Enterococcus faecalis/efectos de los fármacos , Enterococcus faecium/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/epidemiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/microbiología , Humanos , Lipoglucopéptidos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/efectos de los fármacos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA