Mindfulness-based Interventions for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aimed to compile existing evidence examining the effects of mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) for chronic low back pain (CLBP). CLBP leads to millions of disabled individuals in the United States each year. Current pharmacologic treatments are only modestly effective and may present long-term safety issues. MBIs, which have an excellent safety profile, have been shown in prior studies to be effective in treating CLBP yet remained underutilized. DESIGN: Ovid/Medline, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), pilot RCTs, and single-arm studies that explored the effectiveness of MBIs in CLBP. METHODS: Separate searches were conducted to identify trials that evaluated MBIs in reducing pain intensity in individuals with CLBP. A meta-analysis was then performed using R v3.2.2, Metafor package v 1.9-7. RESULTS: Eighteen studies used validated patient-reported pain outcome measures and were therefore included in the meta-analysis. The MBIs included mindfulness meditation, mindfulness-based stress reduction, mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, mindfulness-oriented recovery enhancement, acceptance and commitment therapy, dialectical behavioral therapy, meditation-cognitive behavioral therapy, mindfulness-based care for chronic pain, self-compassion course, and loving-kindness course. Pain intensity scores were reported using a numerical rating scale (0 to 10) or an equivalent scale. The meta-analysis revealed that MBIs have a beneficial effect on pain intensity with a large-sized effect in adults with CLBP. CONCLUSIONS: MBIs seem to be beneficial in reducing pain intensity. Although these results were informative, findings should be carefully interpreted due to the limited data the high variability in study methodologies, small sample sizes, inclusion of studies with high risk of bias, and reliance on pre-post treatment differences with no attention to maintenance of effects. More large-scale RCTs are needed to provide reliable effect size estimates for MBIs in persons with CLBP.

Biofeedback EMG alternative therapy for chronic low back pain (the BEAT-pain study).

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and potential effectiveness of an 8-week virtual EMG biofeedback intervention for patients with CLBP. Methods: Patients with CLBP completed validated baseline and post-intervention assessments of pain intensity and interference (Brief Pain Inventory), back pain-related disability (Oswestry Disability Index), anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale). Participants underwent a series of Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) procedures assessing responses to mechanical stimuli during two separate visits (baseline and post-intervention). In addition, we assessed, using surface EMG, the muscle tension in the trapezius, latissimus, and low back muscles at each session. Patients were randomized into the EMG biofeedback intervention or usual care group. Factorial analysis of variance including the interaction between treatment group and time was used to analyze the changes in pain intensity (primary outcome), pain interference, disability (secondary outcomes), anxiety, and depression (secondary outcomes). Results: Compared to the treatment as usual comparison group, patients in the EMG biofeedback group reported lower pain intensity after completing the intervention (mean group difference 0.9, 95% CI -1.07, -0.32; p≤0.01). Compared to baseline, participants in the EMG biofeedback group demonstrated statistically significant reductions in pain interference (mean difference 1.3, 95% CI 0.42, 2.1; p≤0.01), disability (mean difference 4.32, 95% CI 1.2, 7.3; p≤0.01), and significant increases in low back pain thresholds (mean difference 0.5, 95% CI -0.87, -0.05; p≤0.01), assessed by QST. However, no significant group by time effects were observed for secondary outcomes: pain interference, disability, and low back pain thresholds. In addition, significant changes were observed in muscle tension for the trapezius, latissimus, and low back muscles in the EMG biofeedback group (p<0.001). Conclusions: Virtual EMG biofeedback shows promise as a potential therapy for reducing pain and disability in individuals with chronic nonspecific low back pain.

Electromyography-biofeedback for chronic low back pain: A qualitative cohort study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Surface electromyography-biofeedback (sEMG-BF) may reduce the burden of CLBP by improving physical functioning, sleep, pain catastrophizing, anxiety, and depression. This qualitative study investigated the impact of weekly EMG-BF sessions on adults with CLBP. METHODS: Twenty-six individuals with CLBP participated in telephone interviews after completing an 8-week virtual sEMG-BF intervention. Trained interviewers conducted the 10-to-15-minute semi-structured interviews to understand participants' experience with the intervention. Common themes and subthemes were identified and analyzed using MAXQDA 2022 software. RESULTS: Participants were predominantly middle-aged females (M = 45, range of 19 - 66) who have had exposure to utilizing conventional therapies such as physical therapy, chiropractor, and massage for the treatment of CLBP. This study focused on participants who reported their experience of the main outcome study which included perceived reductions in CLBP symptoms, including pain and stress, and positive effects on self-awareness and sleep. Three overarching themes emerged and were further divided into subthemes: participants' involvement (virtual experience, accessibility of device, and future recommendations) perceived benefits (participants gained awareness, recommendations for future treatment, met expectations, and implementation), and desire for flexibility (obstacles and COVID-19 Impact). No adverse effects were reported by any of the participants within the study. CONCLUSIONS: Both physical and psychological improvements were reported by participants following an sEMG-BF intervention. Specific implementation procedures and critical barriers were identified. In particular, the ability to receive care for CLBP during the COVID-19 pandemic was important to participants.