Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Medicinas Complementárias
Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Drugs Aging ; 21(11): 747-56, 2004.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15323580

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The choice of induction immunosuppression for kidney transplantation in elderly recipients is dictated by the consideration of the risk of infection as well as efficacy in the prevention of acute rejection, thus allowing a reduction in subsequent maintenance immunosuppression and its attendant long-term adverse effects. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of the antibody induction immunosuppression strategies in elderly recipients of kidney transplants. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We present retrospective data analysis on 183 kidney transplant recipients > or = 60 years of age at Hahnemann University Hospital (Philadelphia, PA, USA) over a 12-year period. We compared four consecutive cohorts of kidney transplant recipients receiving lymphocyte immune globulin, equine antithymocyte globulin (ATGAM) [n = 29]; muromonab CD3 (OKT3) [n = 45]; basiliximab (Simulect) with corticosteroid maintenance [n = 40]; and Simulect without corticosteroid maintenance (n = 69). RESULTS: Delayed graft function (DGF) was observed in 48% of patients receiving ATGAM, 35.6% in the OKT3 group and 35% in the Simulect group with corticosteroid maintenance and 36.2% in the Simulect group without corticosteroid maintenance. The rejection rate within the first 3 months was 31% in the ATGAM and OKT3 groups, 17.5% in the Simulect group with corticosteroid maintenance and 14.5% in the Simulect group without corticosteroid maintenance. These differences for DGF and acute rejection were statistically significant between patients receiving ATGAM and OKT3, ATGAM or OKT3 and both groups of Simulect (all p < 0.05). Patients receiving Simulect were free of adverse effects typically encountered by patients receiving polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies for induction. Patients receiving Simulect had much shorter hospital stays and benefited from significant reduction of costs compared with other groups. CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that kidney transplant recipients > or = 60 years of age benefit from induction therapy with Simulect followed by corticosteroid-free maintenance immunosuppression.


Asunto(s)
Terapia de Inmunosupresión/métodos , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Trasplante de Riñón/inmunología , Corticoesteroides/economía , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/economía , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Suero Antilinfocítico/efectos adversos , Suero Antilinfocítico/economía , Suero Antilinfocítico/uso terapéutico , Basiliximab , Estudios de Cohortes , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Terapia de Inmunosupresión/economía , Inmunosupresores/economía , Trasplante de Riñón/mortalidad , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Muromonab-CD3/efectos adversos , Muromonab-CD3/economía , Muromonab-CD3/uso terapéutico , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión/efectos adversos , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión/economía , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Análisis de Supervivencia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA