Effect of adding azithromycin to the antimalarials used for seasonal malaria chemoprevention on the nutritional status of African children.

OBJECTIVES: Mass administration of azithromycin has reduced mortality in children in sub-Saharan Africa but its mode of action is not well characterised. A recent trial found that azithromycin given alongside seasonal malaria chemoprevention was not associated with a reduction in mortality or hospital admissions in young children. We investigated the effect of azithromycin on the nutritional status of children enrolled in this study. METHODS: A total of 19 578 children in Burkina Faso and Mali were randomised to receive either azithromycin or placebo alongside seasonal malaria chemoprevention with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine monthly for three malaria transmission seasons (2014-2016). After each transmission season, anthropometric measurements were collected from approximately 4000 randomly selected children (2000 per country) at a cross-sectional survey and used to derive nutritional status indicators. Binary and continuous outcomes between treatment arms were compared by Poisson and linear regression. RESULTS: Nutritional status among children was poor in both countries with evidence of acute and chronic malnutrition (24.9-33.3% stunted, 15.8-32.0% underweight, 7.2-26.4% wasted). There was a suggestion of improvement in nutritional status in Burkina Faso and deterioration in Mali over the study period. At the end of each malaria transmission season, nutritional status of children did not differ between treatment arms (seasonal malaria chemoprevention plus azithromycin or placebo) in either the intention-to-treat or per-protocol analyses (only children with at least three cycles of SMC in the current intervention year). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of azithromycin to seasonal malaria chemoprevention did not result in an improvement of nutritional outcomes in children in Burkina Faso and Mali.

OBJECTIFS: L'administration massive d'azithromycine a réduit la mortalité infantile en Afrique subsaharienne mais son mode d'action n'est pas bien caractérisé. Un essai récent a révélé que l'azithromycine administrée parallèlement à la chimioprévention du paludisme saisonnier n'était pas associée à une réduction de la mortalité ou des hospitalisations chez les jeunes enfants. Nous avons étudié l'effet de l'azithromycine sur l'état nutritionnel des enfants inscrits à cette étude. MÉTHODES: 19.578 enfants au Burkina Faso et au Mali ont été randomisés pour recevoir soit de l'azithromycine soit un placebo parallèlement à une chimioprévention du paludisme saisonnier avec du sulfadoxine-pyriméthamine plus de l'amodiaquine par mois pendant trois saisons de transmission du paludisme (2014-2016). Après chaque saison de transmission, des mesures anthropométriques ont été recueillies auprès d'environ 4.000 enfants sélectionnés au hasard (2.000 par pays) lors d'une enquête transversale et utilisées pour dériver des indicateurs de l'état nutritionnel. Les résultats binaires et continus entre les bras de traitement ont été comparés par la régression linéaire et de Poisson. RÉSULTATS: L'état nutritionnel des enfants était médiocre dans les deux pays avec des signes de malnutrition aiguë et chronique (24,9 à 33,3% de retard de croissance, 15,8 à 32,0% d'insuffisance pondérale, 7,2 à 26,4% d'émaciation). Il a été suggéré une amélioration de l'état nutritionnel au Burkina Faso et une détérioration au Mali au cours de la période d'étude. A la fin de chaque saison de transmission du paludisme, l'état nutritionnel des enfants ne différait pas entre les bras de traitement (chimioprévention contre le paludisme saisonnier plus azithromycine ou placebo) dans les analyses en intention de traiter ou selon le protocole (seulement les enfants avec au moins trois cycles de chimioprévention dans l'année d'intervention en cours). CONCLUSIONS: L'ajout d'azithromycine à la chimioprévention du paludisme saisonnier n'a pas entraîné d'amélioration des résultats nutritionnels chez les enfants au Burkina Faso et au Mali.

Efficacy, safety, and selection of molecular markers of drug resistance by two ACTs in Mali.

We conducted a randomized single-blinded trial comparing the efficacy and safety of artesunate (AS) + amodiaquine (AQ, 3 days) versus AS (3 days) + sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP, single dose) versus AS monotherapy (5 days) in Southern Mali. Uncomplicated malaria cases were followed for 28 days. Molecular markers of drug resistance were determined. After identification of recrudescences by genotyping, both artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs) reached nearly 100% efficacy at Day 14 and Day 28 versus 98.3% and 96.5% for AS, respectively (P > 0.05). AS + SP significantly selected DHFR and DHPS mutations associated with sulfadoxine and pyrimethamine resistance (P < 0.001), and AS + AQ equally selected PfCRT and PfMDR1 point mutations associated with chloroquine and AQ resistance (P < 0.001). No significant adverse event attributable to any of the study drugs was found. The ACTs were efficacious and safe, but the selection of markers for resistance to the partner drugs raises concerns over their lifespan in areas of intense malaria transmission.

A randomized trial of artesunate-sulfamethoxypyrazine-pyrimethamine versus artemether-lumefantrine for the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Mali.

The choice of artemisinin-based combination that is being adopted for malaria treatment in sub-Saharan Africa may depend on several factors, including cost, efficacy, side effects, and simplicity of administration. We tested the hypothesis that artesunate-sulfamethoxypyrazine-pyrimethamine is as efficacious as the four-dose regimen of artemether-lumefantrine for treatment of Plasmodium falciparum malaria. The study was carried out during two transmission seasons (2003 and 2004) in Sotuba, Mali. Participants at least 6 months of age with uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria were randomly assigned to receive artesunate-sulfamethoxypyrazine-pyrimethamine or artemether-lumefantrine. Treatment efficacy was assessed using the World Health Organization 28-day protocol. A total of 606 (303 in each arm) patients were enrolled. The cure rate was higher for artesunate-sulfamethoxypyrazine-pyrimethamine than for artemether-lumefantrine (98.7% versus 89.6%; P < 0.0001). After correction for cases of re-infection, the cure rates were 100% and 99.0%, respectively (P = 0.08). No serious adverse events occurred. Artesunate-sulfamethoxypyrazine-pyrimethamine is well-tolerated and effective against P. falciparum malaria. It showed an additional benefit of preventing new infections.