Lung cancer working group report.

Asia needs a guideline for non-small-cell lung cancer because of differences in medical care, medical care insurance, ethnic variation and drug approval lag within Asian countries and compared with Western countries. Due to ethnic differences, drug dosages are often higher in the USA than in Japan. EGFR mutation in non-small-cell lung cancer was detected in 32% of Asians but only 6% of non-Asians, while differences in irinotecan metabolism cause higher frequencies of toxicity (leukopenia, diarrhea) in Asians. Pharmacodynamic ethnic differences in relation to paclitaxel/carboplatin resulted in longer median survival and a higher 1-year survival rate for Japanese-advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients compared with Americans. To solve the problem of drug lag, pharmaceutical companies must perform multinational Asian clinical trials with quick accrual of patients, while regulatory authorities must establish high-quality, efficient approval processes, and achieve regulatory harmonization. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network promotes creation of national clinical practice guidelines, and Korea, China and Thailand adapted the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. Many Asian countries still lack such guidelines, and there are no pan-Asian guidelines for non-small-cell lung cancer. Japan developed its own non-small-cell lung cancer guidelines and also a gefitinib guidance. The study group members concluded that immediate establishment of an Asian non-small-cell lung cancer guideline will be difficult because of the differences among the countries. Asian collaborative trials on treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer need to be started at an early date to generate Asian data.

Efficacy differences of pemetrexed by histology in pretreated patients with stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer: review of results from an open-label randomized phase II study.

INTRODUCTION: Recent pivotal phase III studies in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) consistently showed greater survival benefit of pemetrexed in patients with nonsquamous cell carcinoma histology (nonsquamous histology) compared with those with squamous cell carcinoma histology (squamous histology). To confirm the efficacy differences of pemetrexed by histologic type, we conducted an additional subgroup analysis of data from a Japanese randomized phase II study evaluating the efficacy and safety of pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 (P500) and 1000 mg/m2 (P1000) in patients with advanced NSCLC previously treated with chemotherapy. The efficacy and safety results of original phase II study have already been reported (Ohe et al., Clin Cancer Res 2008;14:4206-4212). METHODS: Objective response rates (ORRs), overall survival time, and progression-free survival time were analyzed by subgroup of histology, squamous, and nonsquamous, for the dose groups combined and separately. RESULTS: A total of 216 patients were evaluable for efficacy. One hundred sixty-eight patients had nonsquamous and 48 had squamous histology. ORRs were 20.8% and 2.1% (p < 0.001); median survival times (MST) were 16.0 and 8.5 months (p < 0.001); and median progression-free survival times (PFS) were 3.1 and 1.6 months (p < 0.001) for nonsquamous and squamous histology, respectively. In patients who were randomized to the P500 group, ORR were 23.5% and 0% (p = 0.0062); MST were 19.4 and 7.9 months (p < 0.001); and PFS were 3.1 and 1.4 months (p < 0.001) for nonsquamous and squamous histology, respectively. In patients who were randomized to the P1000 group, ORR were 18.1% and 4.0% (p = 0.1113); MST were 13.5 months and 8.6 months (p = 0.0971); and PFS were 3.1 and 1.7 months (p = 0.0024) for nonsquamous and squamous histology, respectively. There were no clinically relevant differences in the incidence of toxicities between histology groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed the difference of pemetrexed efficacy by histologic type, and this result supports the treatment-by-histology effect observed in the past pivotal phase III studies. Higher dose of pemetrexed resulted in similar outcomes both in patients with nonsquamous histology and squamous histology. Pemetrexed is not as effective as alternative therapies for previously treated squamous histology; however, pemetrexed should be the key agent for the treatment of patients with nonsquamous histology.

Efficacy and safety of two doses of pemetrexed supplemented with folic acid and vitamin B12 in previously treated patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two doses of pemetrexed supplemented with folic acid and vitamin B(12) in pretreated Japanese patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 2, stage III or IV, and who received previously one or two chemotherapy regimens were randomized to receive 500 mg/m(2) pemetrexed (P500) or 1,000 mg/m(2) pemetrexed (P1000) on day 1 every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was response rate. RESULTS: Of the 216 patients evaluable for efficacy (108 in each arm), response rates were 18.5% (90% confidence interval, 12.6-25.8%) and 14.8% (90% confidence interval, 9.5-21.6%), median survival times were 16.0 and 12.6 months, 1-year survival rates were 59.2% and 53.7%, and median progression-free survival were 3.0 and 2.5 months for the P500 and P1000, respectively. Cox multiple regression analysis indicated that pemetrexed dose was not a significant prognostic factor. Drug-related toxicity was generally tolerable for both doses; however, the safety profile of P500 showed generally milder toxicity. Main adverse drug reactions of severity grade 3 or 4 were neutrophil count decreased (20.2%) and alanine aminotransferase (glutamine pyruvic transaminase) increased (15.8%) in P500 and neutrophil count decreased (24.3%), WBC count decreased (20.7%), and lymphocyte count decreased (18.0%) in P1000. One drug-related death from interstitial lung disease occurred in the P500. CONCLUSION: P500 and P1000 are similarly active with promising efficacy and acceptable safety outcomes in pretreated patients with NSCLC. These results support the use of P500 as a second- and third-line treatment of NSCLC.

Efficacy and safety of pemetrexed in combination with cisplatin for malignant pleural mesothelioma: a phase I/II study in Japanese patients.

BACKGROUND: Pemetrexed in combination with cisplatin (Pem/Cis) is used globally for the treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). This Phase I/II study was conducted to determine the recommended dose (RD) (Phase I) of Pem/Cis, and evaluate the efficacy and safety (Phase II) in Japanese MPM patients. METHODS: Key eligibility criteria were histologic diagnosis of MPM incurable by surgery, no prior chemotherapy, and a performance status 0-1. Under full vitamin supplementation, pemetrexed was intravenously administered on Day 1 of a 21-day cycle, followed by cisplatin. A cohort of six patients, starting from pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) (Level 1), were studied in the dose-escalation Phase I (Step 1). The RD determined in Step 1 was carried forward into Phase II (Step 2). Planned number of patients treated with Pem/Cis was 18-38. RESULTS: In Step 1, 13 patients were enrolled: seven in Level 1 and six in Level -1 (pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2), cisplatin 60 mg/m(2)). Two of six evaluable patients had dose-limiting toxicities (pneumonitis and neutropenia) in Level 1, establishing Level 1 as the RD. In Step 2, 12 patients were enrolled, for a total of 19 patients treated at the RD. Seven patients achieved a partial response among these patients, for a response rate of 36.8% (95% confidence interval: 16.3-61.6); overall survival was 7.3 months. One drug-related death occurred due to worsening of a pre-existing pneumonia. Common grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia and decreased-hemoglobin. CONCLUSION: The Pem/Cis combination provides promising activity and an acceptable safety profile for chemonaive Japanese MPM patients with the same recommend dosage and schedule used in rest of the world.

Retrospective analysis of safety and efficacy of low-dose docetaxel 60 mg/m2 in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy.

The efficacy and toxicity of low-dose docetaxel (60 mg/m2) were evaluated in patients with relapsed non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after platinum-containing chemotherapy. Docetaxel 60 mg/m2 was infused during 1 hour with no routine premedication, with courses repeated at 3-week intervals. Twenty-seven patients were analyzed retrospectively. The median age was 56 years (range, 32-72); 22 patients (81.5%) had adenocarcinoma, 26 (96.3%) had stage IV disease, and 23 (85.2%) were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 1. Five patients (18.5%) had a partial response. Median progression-free survival time for all patients was 1.9 months, and median survival time was 9.4 months. The predominant toxicity was neutropenia, which was grade III or IV in 63% of patients. No neutropenic fever was observed. Other hematologic toxicities were mild (all grade II). Thus, low-dose docetaxel (60 mg/m2) yielded a response rate comparable to that achieved with moderate- to high-dose docetaxel (75-100 mg/m2) as second-line chemotherapy in platinum-pretreated NSCLC, and had less toxicity. Further investigation of the optimal docetaxel dose as second-line chemotherapy in NSCLC is warranted.

Differential gene expression profiles and identification of the genes relevant to clinicopathologic factors in colorectal cancer selected by cDNA array method in combination with principal component analysis.

The clinical outcome of patients with colorectal cancer frequently varies even if they are at the same clinicopathologic stage. Alternative superior tumor markers of colorectal cancer are needed for prediction of clinical outcome. To clarify the regulatory factors in colorectal cancers, we examined differential expression profiles using cDNA macroarray technique with surgically resected specimens obtained from the patients with colorectal cancer. The gene profiles by an average-linkage hierarchical clustering analysis were found to be almost separable into two groups: tumor group and normal mucosa group. The relationship between several clinicopathologic factors and cancer related genes were investigated by using statistical analyses including principal component analysis (PCA). c-myc-binding protein MM-1, and c-jun proto-oncogene were identified as possible markers of tumor histology and clinical prognosis and early growth response protein 1 (EGR1) was selected to play an important role in progression of clinical stage. We conclude that, with PCA method, we successfully selected the genes relevant to clinicopathologic factors using limited population of clinical samples.