In vivo study assessed meropenem and amikacin combination therapy against carbapenem-resistant and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae strains.

BACKGROUND: Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), especially for carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE), is an emerging cause that pose a significant threat to public health. However, efficient therapy has not been established. We assessed the antimicrobial efficacy of meropenem (MEPM) and amikacin (AMK) combination therapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Total eight isolates of Escherichia coli or Klebsiella pneumoniae, including CRE and/or CPE have carbapenemase genes were used. The relationship between phenotype and in vivo efficacy was assessed in neutropenic murine thigh infection model. Efficacy was determined using the change in bacterial density and survival rate. RESULTS: The combination therapy showed enhanced antimicrobial activities against CRE+/CPE+ and CRE+/CPE-K. pneumoniae isolates than MEPM monotherapy (0.63 ± 0.04 vs. 2.56 ± 0.24 ⊿log10 cfu/mL, p < 0.05; -1.05 ± 0.15 vs. -0.48 ± 0.30 ⊿log10 cfu/mL, p < 0.05). Likewise, the combination therapy showed enhanced antimicrobial activities against CRE+/CPE+ and CRE+/CPE-E. coli isolates than MEPM monotherapy (0.90 ± 0.68 vs. 1.86 ± 0.23 ⊿log10 cfu/mL, p < 0.05; -1.81 ± 0.06 vs. -0.88 ± 0.23 ⊿log10 cfu/mL, p < 0.05). Also, combination therapy group showed similar to higher survival rates in CRE + E. coli infection mice, compared to MEPM monotherapy group. CONCLUSION: Our results are the first supportive data to threat CRE infections with combination therapy of MEPM and AMK with in vivo model. The current results verify the promising utility of the combination therapy with MEPM and AMK against CRE isolates with a wide range of MEPM MICs.

Efficacy of tedizolid against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Peptostreptococcus anaerobius in thigh mixed-infection mouse model.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to compare the antimicrobial activity of human simulated exposures of tedizolid 200 mg daily, and linezolid 600 mg every 12 h for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infection (cSSSI) caused by MRSA and Peptostreptococcus anaerobius in both the neutropenic mice thigh mixed-infection models. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Tedizolid phosphate and linezolid were used for all in vivo testing. A total of one MRSA and two P. anaerobius isolates were utilized. Antimicrobial efficacy was calculated for each isolate as the change in bacterial numbers (Δlog10 CFU/ml) obtained in the treated mice after 24 h compared with the numbers in the starting control animals (0 h). RESULTS: The tedizolid and linezolid MICs for MRSA was 0.25 and 2 µg/ml. Tedizolid MIC for P. anaerobius was 0.12 µg/ml, and linezolid MICs for two P. anaerobius isolates were 0.5 and 1 µg/ml. In mixed infection model, tedizolid therapy showed similar antimicrobial activities for one MRSA and two P. anaerobius isolates evaluated, compared with linezolid therapy. Additionally, when comparing the activity of tedizolid and linezolid monotherapy between single infection and mixed infection model, antimicrobial activities of both antimicrobials were attenuated when mixed infection model was used. CONCLUSION: In the neutropenic murine thigh infection model, human simulated exposures of tedizolid and linezolid resulted in similar efficacies against MRSA, even though single and mixed infection models were used. These data support the clinical utility of tedizolid for use against MRSA and P. anaerobius in the treatment of cSSSI.

Colistin loading dose enhanced antimicrobial activity for in vivo mouse thigh infection model with Pseudomonas aeruginosa with highly antimicrobial resistant.

This is the first report to test the loading dosage of colistin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, including MDRP. Using in vivo murine thigh infection model, in the loading dosage regimen (Day 1:50 mg/kg q12 h, Day 2-3: 25 mg/kg q12 h) group, 5 to 6 log10 CFU/ml reduction compared with control were observed for both strains of P. aeruginosa with colistin MIC 0.5 and 1 µg/mL at 72 h. But, similar reduction was observed for the strains with colistin MIC 0.5 µg/mL only in normal dosage regimen (Day 1-3: 25 mg/kg q12 h) group. For P. aeruginosa with colistin MIC 1 µg/mL, colistin loading dosage regimens showed greater antimicrobial activity than that of without loading dosage group (p < 0.05). These data suggest that the colistin loading regimen would be one of the useful options for P. aeruginosa with antimicrobial resistance infection treatment.