Effectiveness and Safety of Biologic Therapy in Hispanic Vs Non-Hispanic Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A CA-IBD Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: There are limited data on outcomes of biologic therapy in Hispanic patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs). We compared risk of hospitalization, surgery, and serious infections in Hispanic vs non-Hispanic patients with IBD in a multicenter, electronic health record-based cohort of biologic-treated patients. METHODS: We identified adult patients with IBD who were new users of biologic agents (tumor necrosis factor α [TNF-α] antagonists, ustekinumab, vedolizumab) from 5 academic institutions in California between 2010 and 2017. We compared the risk of all-cause hospitalization, IBD-related surgery, and serious infections in Hispanic vs non-Hispanic patients using 1:4 propensity score matching and survival analysis. RESULTS: We compared 240 Hispanic patients (53% male; 45% with ulcerative colitis; 73% TNF-α antagonist-treated; 20% with prior biologic exposure) with 960 non-Hispanic patients (51% male; 44% with ulcerative colitis; 67% TNF-α antagonist-treated; 27% with prior biologic exposure). After propensity score matching, Hispanic patients were younger (37 ± 15 vs 40 ± 16 y; P = .02) and had a higher burden of comorbidities (Elixhauser index, >0; 37% vs 26%; P < .01), without any differences in patterns of medication use, burden of inflammation, and hospitalizations. Within 1 year of biologic initiation, Hispanic patients had higher rates of hospitalizations (31% vs 23%; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.32; 95% CI, 1.01-1.74) and IBD-related surgery (7.1% vs 4.6%; aHR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.07-3.72), with a trend toward higher risk of serious infections (8.8% vs 4.9%; aHR, 1.74; 95% CI, 0.99-3.05). CONCLUSIONS: In a multicenter, propensity score-matched cohort of biologic-treated patients with IBD, Hispanic patients experienced higher rates of hospitalization, surgery, and serious infections. Future studies are needed to investigate the biological, social, and environmental drivers of these differences.

Comparative Safety and Effectiveness of Biologic Therapy for Crohn's Disease: A CA-IBD Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: We compared the safety and effectiveness of tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) antagonists vs vedolizumab vs ustekinumab in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) in a multicenter cohort (CA-IBD). METHODS: We created an electronic health record-based cohort of adult patients with CD who were initiating a new biologic agent (TNF-α antagonists, ustekinumab, vedolizumab) from 5 health systems in California between 2010 and 2017. We compared the risk of serious infections (safety) and all-cause hospitalization and inflammatory bowel disease-related surgery (effectiveness) between different biologic classes using propensity score (PS) matching. RESULTS: As compared with TNF-α antagonists (n = 1030), 2:1 PS-matched, ustekinumab-treated patients with CD (n = 515) experienced a lower risk of serious infections (hazard ratio [HR], 0.36; 95% CI, 0.20-0.64), without any difference in the risk of hospitalization (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.89-1.21) or surgery (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.69-1.70). Compared with vedolizumab (n = 221), 1:1 PS-matched, ustekinumab-treated patients with CD (n = 221) experienced a lower risk of serious infections (HR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.07-0.60), without significant differences in risk of hospitalization (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.54-1.07) or surgery (HR, 1.42; 95% CI, 0.54-3.72). Compared with TNF-α antagonists (n = 442), 2:1 PS-matched, vedolizumab-treated patients with CD (n = 221) had a similar risk of serious infections (HR, 1.53; 95% CI, 0.84-2.78), hospitalization (HR, 1.32; 95% CI, 0.98-1.77), and surgery (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.27-1.47). High comorbidity burden, concomitant opiate use, and prior hospitalization were associated with serious infections and hospitalization in biologic-treated patients with CD. CONCLUSION: In a multicenter cohort of biologic-treated patients with CD, ustekinumab was associated with a lower risk of serious infections compared with TNF-α antagonists and vedolizumab, without any differences in risk of hospitalization or surgery. The risk of serious infections was similar for TNF-α antagonists vs vedolizumab.

No Benefit of Continuing 5-Aminosalicylates in Patients with Crohn's Disease Treated with Anti-metabolite Therapy.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: 5-aminosalicylates (5-ASA) are frequently used in the management of Crohn's disease (CD). We used a de-identified administrative claims database to compare patterns and outcomes of continuing versus stopping 5-ASA in patients with CD who escalated to anti-metabolite monotherapy. METHODS: Patients with CD on 5-ASA who were new users of anti-metabolite monotherapy and followed for at least 12 months from OptumLabs® Data Warehouse. Three patterns of 5-ASA use were identified: stopped 5-ASA, short-term 5-ASA (use for < 6 months after starting anti-metabolites), or persistent 5-ASA (use for > 6 months after starting anti-metabolites). Outcomes (need for corticosteroids, risk of CD-related hospitalization and/or surgery, treatment escalation to biologic therapy) were compared using Cox proportional hazard analysis adjusting for key covariates, with a 12-month immortal time period. RESULTS: Of 3036 patients with CD who were new-users of anti-metabolite monotherapy, 667 (21.9%), 626 (20.6%), and 1743 (57.4%) stopped 5-ASA, used 5-ASA transiently or persistently, respectively. Compared to patients who stopped 5-ASA after starting anti-metabolites, persistent 5-ASA use was associated with a higher risk of corticosteroid use (HR, 1.24 [1.08-1.42]), without an increase in risk of CD-related hospitalization (HR, 1.21 [0.98-1.49]), CD-related surgery (HR, 1.28 [0.90-1.80]) or treatment escalation (HR, 0.85 [0.62-1.20]). Sensitivity analyses using a 3-month window after initiation of anti-metabolites to classify patients as continuing vs. stopping 5-ASA showed similar results. Residual confounding by disease severity could not be excluded. CONCLUSION: 5-ASAs are frequently continued long-term even after escalation to anti-metabolite therapy in patients with CD but offer no clinical benefit over stopping 5-ASA.

Early Reduction in MM-SES-CD Score After Initiation of Biologic Therapy is Highly Specific for 1-year Endoscopic Remission in Moderate to Severe Crohn's Disease.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: This study evaluated the minimal clinically important short-term improvement in the Modified Multiplier Simple Endoscopic Score for crohn's Disease [MM-SES-CD], a novel modified scoring system of the SES-CD, which reliably predicted 1-year endoscopic remission [ER]. METHODS: This post-hoc analysis of two CD clinical trial programmes pooled data of 198 participants with baseline ulcers and SES-CD ≥3, who had baseline, post-induction [8-12 weeks], and 1-year endoscopic assessments. Different cut-off values for endoscopic response were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic [ROC] curves, positive likelihood ratios [PLR], and negative likelihood ratios [NLR]. ER [SES-CD <3] was the binary classifier in all cases. A distribution of cut-offs minimising NLR and maximising PLR was created with 10 000 bootstrapped resamples. An optimal cut-point for low and high probability of 1-year ER was determined based on the maximum Youden Index. RESULTS: MM-SES-CD ≥40% reduction from baseline was selected as the cut-off maximising PLR and minimising NLR. Among 7.6% [15/198] participants achieving this cut-off post-induction, 1-year ER was 46.7%. One-year ER was 16.9% among those not achieving this cut-off. This threshold predicted 1-year ER with 95.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 90.4%-97.8%) specificity and a PLR of 3.7 [95% CI 1.4-9.5], which was higher than traditional endoscopic response criteria of SES-CD ≥50% reduction [specificity 62.5%, 95% CI 54.5%-70.0%; PLR 1.9, 95% CI 1.4-2.5]. Lower thresholds of MM-SES-CD reduction also were highly specific for 1-year ER [e.g., MM-SES-CD ≥20% reduction was achieved in 19.7% of patients with 83.1% specificity]. CONCLUSIONS: In CD patients, post-induction endoscopic response defined by MM-SES-CD ≥40% reduction from baseline identified patients most likely to achieve 1-year ER.

Efficacy of Pharmacological Agents for Ulcerative Proctitis: A Systematic Literature Review.

BACKGROUND: Ulcerative proctitis is a common and often highly symptomatic form of inflammatory bowel disease. We performed a systematic review to assess the efficacy of different therapies in the management of patients with ulcerative proctitis. METHODS: We identified randomized controlled trials in adults with ulcerative proctitis treated with oral or topical therapies for induction of response or remission, or prevention of relapse. RESULTS: A total of 32 randomized controlled trials were included [27 induction/2839 participants, five maintenance/334 participants]. Follow-up varied from 3 to 8 weeks for induction, and from 6 to 24 months for maintenance of remission. 5-Aminosalicylic acid [5-ASA] suppository was the most frequently evaluated treatment [14/32, 43.7%], followed by steroid enema [7/32, 21.9%]. Topical 5-ASA demonstrated effectiveness for induction of clinical response or remission and prevention of relapse in several studies. Combined topical steroids and 5-ASA was more effective than topical 5-ASA or topical steroids alone to induce response [100% of patients for combination vs 70% for beclomethasone alone and 76% for 5-ASA alone]. One observational study suggested azathioprine may be effective in patients with ulcerative proctitis. Only two cohort studies evaluated the efficacy of tumour necrosis factor inhibitors in ulcerative proctitis. Small molecules, anti-integrins and anti-interleukin therapies have not been evaluated in isolated ulcerative proctitis. CONCLUSION: The role of topical 5-ASA as a treatment for ulcerative proctitis has been confirmed in this systematic literature review, for induction and maintenance of remission. Future trials are needed to investigate the efficacy of more recent and upcoming drug classes in patients with ulcerative proctitis.

Comparative efficacy and safety of biologic therapies for moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Data are needed to inform the positioning of biologic therapy in the treatment of moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease, both first line and after previous biologic exposure. We aimed to assess the comparative efficacy and safety of biologics in patients with Crohn's disease. METHODS: We did a systematic review and network meta-analysis of phase 2 and phase 3 randomised controlled trials done in adults (≥18 years) with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease (Crohn's Disease Activity Index [CDAI] 220-450) treated with tumour necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists, anti-integrin, anti-interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-23p40, or anti-IL23p19 agents, either alone or in combination with immunosuppressants, as their first-line biologic or after previous biologic exposure, compared with placebo or an active comparator. The minimum duration of therapy was 14 days for trials reporting induction of remission in active disease and 22 weeks in trials reporting maintenance of remission. We searched Medline, EMBASE, the Cochrane CENTRAL Register of Controlled Trials, conference proceedings, trial registries, and unpublished data from inception to June 3, 2021, without any language restrictions. Summary estimates of the primary and secondary outcomes were extracted from the published reports; individual patient-level data were not sought. The primary endpoint was induction of clinical remission in patients with active disease (CDAI <150) and maintenance of remission in patients with response to induction therapy, with data extracted from published reports. A network meta-analysis with multivariate consistency model random-effects meta-regression was done, with rankings based on surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values. FINDINGS: The search strategy yielded 18 382 citations, of which 31 trials were eligible for inclusion. On the basis of 15 randomised controlled trials including 2931 biologic-naive patients, infliximab monotherapy (odds ratio [OR] 4·53 [95% CI 1·49-13·79]), infliximab combined with azathioprine (7·49 [2·04-27·49]), adalimumab (3·01 [1·25-7·27]), and ustekinumab (2·63 [1·10-6·28]) were associated with significantly higher odds of inducing remission compared to certolizumab pegol (all moderate confidence); infliximab and azathioprine combination therapy was also associated with significantly higher odds of inducing remission than vedolizumab (3·76 [1·01-14·03]; low confidence). On the basis of ten randomised controlled trials including 2479 patients with previous biologic exposure, adalimumab after loss of response to infliximab (OR 2·82 [95% CI 1·20-6·62]; low confidence), and risankizumab (2·10 [1·12-3·92]; moderate confidence), were associated with higher odds of inducing remission than vedolizumab. No differences between active interventions were observed in maintenance trials. Most trials were at low or uncertain risk of bias. INTERPRETATION: Although biologic treatment choices in patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease must be individualised for each patient, this analysis suggests that either infliximab with azathioprine or adalimumab might be preferred as a first-line therapy, and adalimumab (after infliximab loss of response) or risankizumab might be preferred as a second-line therapy, for induction of clinical remission. FUNDING: None.

No benefit of continuing vs stopping 5-aminosalicylates in patients with ulcerative colitis escalated to anti-metabolite therapy.

BACKGROUND: Whilst continuation of 5-aminosalicylates (5-ASA) after escalation to biologic therapy is considered ineffective in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), their role in patients escalated to anti-metabolites is unclear. AIM: To compared patterns and outcomes of continuing vs stopping 5-ASA in patients with UC who escalated to anti-metabolite monotherapy, using a de-identified administrative claims database. METHODS: We identified patients with UC who were new users of anti-metabolite monotherapy who were receiving 5-ASA, and were followed for at least 12 months after starting anti-metabolite therapy. We evaluated patterns of 5-ASA use (stopped 5-ASA, short-term 5-ASA use for <6 months after starting anti-metabolites, persistent 5-ASA use for >6 months after starting anti-metabolites). We compared outcomes (risk of UC-related hospitalisation and/or surgery, need for corticosteroids, treatment escalation to biologic therapy) by pattern of 5-ASA use, using Cox proportional hazard analysis adjusting for age, sex, race, comorbidity burden, and hospitalisation or emergency department visit, abdominal surgery and corticosteroid use in the previous 12 months (as measures of disease severity), with a 12-month immortal time period. RESULTS: Of 4068 patients with UC who were new-users of anti-metabolite monotherapy, 578 (14.2%), 782 (19.2%) and 2708 (66.6%) stopped 5-ASA, used 5-ASA transiently or persistently, respectively. Compared to patients who stopped 5-ASA after starting anti-metabolites, persistent 5-ASA use was associated with a higher risk of UC-related hospitalisation (HR, 1.40 [1.07-1.83]) and corticosteroid use (HR, 1.48 [1.28-1.70]), without an increase in risk of UC-related surgery (HR, 1.32 [0.86-2.00]) or treatment escalation (HR, 0.80 [0.53-1.20]). Sensitivity analyses using a 3 months window after initiation of anti-metabolites to classify patients as continuing vs stopping 5-ASA showed similar results. Residual confounding by disease severity could not be excluded. CONCLUSION: 5-ASA are usually continued long-term even after escalating to anti-metabolite therapy in patients with UC without clinical benefit.

Approaches to Integrating Biomarkers Into Clinical Trials and Care Pathways as Targets for the Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: There is no consensus on the best way to integrate biomarkers into inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) research and clinical practice. The International Organization for the Study of Inflammatory Bowel Disease aimed to outline biomarker definitions, categories, and operating properties required for their use in registration trials and clinical practice. Using fecal calprotectin as an example, we provide a framework for biomarker development and validation in patients with IBD. METHODS: We reviewed international society guidelines, regulatory agency guidance documents, and standardized reporting guidelines for biomarkers, in combination with publications on fecal calprotectin levels in patients with IBD. We assessed the validity of fecal calprotectin to serve as a surrogate biomarker of IBD activity and outlined a framework for further validation and development of biomarkers. RESULTS: No endpoints have been fully validated as surrogates of risk of disease complications; mucosal healing is the most valid endpoint used to determine risk of disease complications. Fecal level of calprotectin has not been validated as a biomarker for IBD activity because of lack of technical and clinical reliability, assessment of performance when used as a replacement for endoscopy, and assessment of responsiveness to changes in disease states. The level of fecal calprotectin can be used only as a prognostic factor for disease recurrence in patients in remission after medical or surgical treatment. CONCLUSIONS: We reviewed guidelines, regulatory documents, and publications to identify properties required for the development of biomarkers of IBD activity and areas in need of clarification from regulatory agencies and societies. We propose a path forward for research of biomarkers for IBD.

No Benefit of Concomitant 5-Aminosalicylates in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis Escalated to Biologic Therapy: Pooled Analysis of Individual Participant Data From Clinical Trials.

OBJECTIVES: 5-aminosalicylates (5-ASA) are frequently continued in patients with moderate-severe ulcerative colitis (UC), even after escalation to biologic agents, without evaluation of the benefit of this approach. We conducted an individual participant data (IPD) pooled analysis of trials of infliximab and golimumab in UC, to evaluate whether concomitant use of 5-ASA modifies clinical outcomes among anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α-treated patients. METHODS: We included IPD from five trials of infliximab and golimumab in patients with moderate-severe UC (ACT-1 and -2, PURSUIT-SC, PURSUIT-M, NCT00336492). Patients treated with infliximab or golimumab were categorized as receiving concomitant 5-ASA or not at time of trial entry. Primary outcome was clinical remission (Mayo Clinic Score < 3) at last follow-up for each trial; secondary outcomes were clinical response and mucosal healing. Using multivariable logistic regression analysis, we evaluated association between concomitant 5-ASA and clinical remission, after adjusting for sex, smoking, baseline disease activity, disease extent, biochemical variables (C-reactive protein, albumin, hemoglobin), and concomitant prednisone and immunomodulators. RESULTS: We included 2183 infliximab-treated or golimumab-treated patients (1715 [78.6%] on 5-ASA). Concomitant use of 5-ASA was not associated with odds of achieving clinical remission (adjusted OR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.45-1.01], p = 0.06), clinical response (aOR, 0.89 [0.60-1.33], p = 0.58) or mucosal healing (aOR, 1.12 [0.82-1.51], p = 0.48). These results were consistent in trials of induction and maintenance therapy, and in trials of infliximab and golimumab. CONCLUSIONS: Based on IPD pooled analysis, in patients with moderate-severe UC who are escalated to anti-TNF therapy, continuing 5-ASA does not improve clinical outcomes.

Interpreting Registrational Clinical Trials of Biological Therapies in Adults with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.

BACKGROUND: The use of biologics to treat inflammatory bowel disease is supported by robust randomized controlled trials in both ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. Nonetheless, an understanding of the principles of clinical trial design is necessary to extrapolate study findings to clinical practice. METHODS: We conducted a review of inflammatory bowel disease registrational clinical trials of biologics to determine how differences in trial design potentially influence results and interpretation. RESULTS: Registrational trials of biological agents have used diverse patient populations, outcome measures, and designs, which makes comparisons of results among studies difficult. Key differences among trials include patient populations, choice of symptom-based measures or objective outcomes as endpoints, and overall trial design. Additional factors, including analytical methods, can also influence the interpretation of outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The most robust evidence is derived from comparative effectiveness trials. In the absence of these, clinicians should be aware of the various methodological issues which could impact interpretation of efficacy and safety outcomes, including differences in patient population, study design, and analytic methodology.

Treatment and prevention of pouchitis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND: Pouchitis occurs in approximately 50% of patients following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for chronic ulcerative colitis. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to determine the efficacy and safety of medical therapies (including antibiotics, probiotics, and other agents) for prevention or treatment of acute or chronic pouchitis. SEARCH METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library from inception to October 2014. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials of prevention or treatment of acute or chronic pouchitis in adults who underwent IPAA for ulcerative colitis were considered for inclusion. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently screened studies for eligibility, extracted data and assessed study quality. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. The overall quality of the evidence supporting the outcomes was evaluated using the GRADE criteria. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with clinical improvement or remission of pouchitis in patients with acute or chronic pouchitis, or the proportion of patients with no episodes of pouchitis after IPAA. The proportion of patients who developed at least one adverse event was a secondary outcome. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) for each dichotomous outcome. MAIN RESULTS: Thirteen studies (517 participants) were included in the review. Four studies assessed treatment of acute pouchitis. One study (16 participants) compared ciprofloxacin and metronidazole; another (26 participants) compared metronidazole to budesonide enemas; another (18 participants) compared rifaximin to placebo; and the fourth study (20 participants) compared Lactobacillus GG to placebo. Four studies assessed treatment of chronic pouchitis. One study (19 participants) compared glutamine to butyrate suppositories; another (40 participants) compared bismuth enemas to placebo; and two studies (76 participants) compared VSL#3 to placebo. Five studies assessed prevention of pouchitis. One study (40 participants) compared VSL#3 to placebo; another (28 participants) compared VLS#3 to no treatment; one study (184 participants) compared allopurinol to placebo; another (12 participants) compared the probiotic Bifidobacterium longum to placebo; and one study (38 participants) compared tinidazole to placebo. Three studies were judged to be of high quality. Two studies were judged to be low quality and the quality of the other studies was unclear. Treatment of acute pouchitis: The results of one small study (16 participants) suggest that ciprofloxacin may be more effective than metronidazole for the treatment of acute pouchitis. One hundred per cent (7/7) of ciprofloxacin patients achieved remission at two weeks compared to 33% (3/9) of metronidazole patients. A GRADE analysis indicated that the overall quality of the evidence supporting this outcome was very low due to high risk of bias (no blinding) and very sparse data (10 events). There was no difference in the proportion of patients who had at least one adverse event (RR 0.18, 95% CI 0.01 to 2.98). Adverse events included vomiting, dysgeusia or transient peripheral neuropathy. There were no differences between metronidazole and budesonide enemas in terms of clinical remission, clinical improvement or adverse events. Adverse events included anorexia, nausea, headache, asthenia, metallic taste, vomiting, paraesthesia, and depression. There were no differences between rifaximin and placebo in terms of clinical remission, clinical improvement, or adverse events. Adverse events included diarrhea, flatulence, nausea, proctalgia, vomiting, thirst, candida, upper respiratory tract infection, increased hepatic enzyme, and cluster headache. There was no difference in clinical improvement between Lactobacillus GG and placebo. The results of these studies are uncertain due to very low quality evidence. Treatment of chronic pouchitis: A pooled analysis of two studies (76 participants) suggests that VSL#3 may be more effective than placebo for maintenance of remission. Eighty-five per cent (34/40) of VLS#3 patients maintained remission at 9 to 12 months compared to 3% (1/36) of placebo patients (RR 20.24, 95% CI 4.28 to 95.81). A GRADE analysis indicated that the quality of evidence supporting this outcome was low due to very sparse data (35 events). Adverse events included abdominal cramps, vomiting and diarrhea. There was no difference in effectiveness between glutamine and butyrate suppositories for maintenance of remission. There was no difference in clinical improvement or adverse event rates between bismuth carbomer foam enemas and placebo. Adverse events included diarrhea, worsening symptoms, cramping, sinusitis, and abdominal pain. The results of these studies are uncertain due to very low quality evidence. Prevention of pouchitis: The results of one small study (40 participants) suggest that VSL#3 may be more effective than placebo for prevention of pouchitis. Ninety per cent (18/20) of VSL#3 patients had no episodes of acute pouchitis during the 12 month study compared to 60% (12/20) of placebo patients (RR 1.50, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.21). A GRADE analysis indicated that the quality of evidence supporting this outcome was low due to very sparse data (30 events). Another small study (28 participants) found that VLS#3 was not more effective than no treatment for prevention of pouchitis. Bifidobacterium longum, allopurinol and tinidazole were not more effective than placebo for prevention of pouchitis. The results of these studies are uncertain due to very low quality evidence. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: For acute pouchitis, very low quality evidence suggests that ciprofloxacin may be more effective than metronidazole. For chronic pouchitis, low quality evidence suggests that VSL#3 may be more effective than placebo for maintenance of remission. For the prevention of pouchitis, low quality evidence suggests that VSL#3 may be more effective than placebo. Well designed, adequately powered studies are needed to determine the optimal therapy for the treatment and prevention of pouchitis.

Converging goals of treatment of inflammatory bowel disease from clinical trials and practice.

It is important to have clear goals for treating inflammatory bowel disease in clinical practice and in research. Conventional end points for trials in ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease have been based on composite indices, such as the Mayo Clinic Score and the Crohn's Disease Activity Index; these indices incorporate symptoms, signs, and findings from laboratory tests and sometimes endoscopic assessments. Although definitions of clinical response and remission have been based on these indices for regulatory purposes, they are difficult to apply to practice because they are complex and not intuitive to clinicians. This has caused a disconnect between clinical trials and practice. Recently, the use of composite indices in trials has been reevaluated in Food and Drug Administration-sponsored Gastroenterology Regulatory Endpoints and the Advancement of Therapeutics workshops due to concerns about the validity of the indices. Alternative measures of outcome and definitions of response are being developed. Patient-reported outcomes are psychometric instruments created and defined by patients to quantify symptoms. A combination of end points, comprising patient-reported outcomes and objective evaluation of inflammation by endoscopy, offers a clinically meaningful and scientifically valid alternative to existing composite indices. Unlike composite indices, response definitions based on endoscopy and patient-reported outcomes can be readily applied in practice. This convergence of outcome assessment in clinical trials and practice could expedite implementation of "treat-to-target" algorithms, in which therapy is progressively intensified until a specific treatment goal is reached. This approach could improve patient care by reducing rates of disease-related complications, surgery, and hospitalization.

Treat to target: a proposed new paradigm for the management of Crohn's disease.

The traditional management of Crohn's disease, which is based on progressive, step-wise treatment intensification with re-evaluation of response according to symptoms, does not improve long-term outcomes of Crohn's disease and places patients at risk for bowel damage. The introduction of novel therapies and the development of new approaches to treatment in rheumatoid arthritis led to better outcomes for patients. Prominent among these is a "treat to target" strategy that is based on regular assessment of disease activity by using objective clinical and biological outcome measures and the subsequent adjustment of treatments. This approach is complementary to the concept of early intervention in high-risk patients. This review evaluates current literature on this topic and proposes a definition for the concept of treating to targets for Crohn's disease.

Ciprofloxacin for the prevention of postoperative recurrence in patients with Crohn's disease: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study.

BACKGROUND: The commensal bacterial flora plays a critical role in the postoperative recurrence of Crohn's disease (CD). We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled 6-month pilot trial of ciprofloxacin for the prevention of endoscopic recurrence in patients with CD who underwent surgery. METHODS: Thirty-three patients with CD, who had undergone surgery with ileocolonic anastomosis within the previous 2 weeks, were randomized to treatment with ciprofloxacin (500 mg twice daily) or placebo tablets for 6 months. Endpoints were endoscopic recurrence at 6 months and safety and tolerability of long-term ciprofloxacin therapy. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients were randomized; 14 patients discontinued the study early. Significant endoscopic recurrence was observed in 3 of 9 patients (33%) in the ciprofloxacin group and 5 of 10 patients (50%) in the placebo group at 6 months after surgery (P < 0.578). The intention-to-treat analysis demonstrated endoscopic recurrence in 11 of 17 patients (65%) in the ciprofloxacin group and 11 of 16 patients (69%) in the placebo group at month 6 (P < 0.805). Thirty-six adverse events occurred in 19 of 33 patients (58%). Possible drug-associated adverse events occurred significantly more often in the ciprofloxacin group (P < 0.043), leading to study drug discontinuation in 24% (4 of 17) and 6% of patients (1 of 16) in the ciprofloxacin and placebo groups, respectively (P < 0.166). CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study, ciprofloxacin was not more effective than placebo for the prevention of postoperative recurrence in patients with CD. Long-term ciprofloxacin therapy is limited by drug-associated side effects. Future studies in postoperative prevention of CD should evaluate antibiotic approaches with a more favorable safety profile.

Andrographis paniculata extract (HMPL-004) for active ulcerative colitis.

OBJECTIVES: Andrographis paniculata has in vitro inhibitory activity against TNF-α, IL-1ß and NF-κB. A pilot study of A. paniculata extract (HMPL-004) suggested similar efficacy to mesalamine for ulcerative colitis. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluated the efficacy of A. paniculata extract (HMPL-004) in 224 adults with mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis. Patients were randomized to A. paniculata extract (HMPL-004) 1,200 mg or 1,800 mg daily or placebo for 8 weeks. RESULTS: In total, 45 and 60% of patients receiving A. paniculata 1,200 mg and 1,800 mg daily, respectively, were in clinical response at week 8, compared with 40% of those who received placebo (P=0.5924 for 1,200 mg vs. placebo and P=0.0183 for 1,800 mg vs. placebo). In all, 34 and 38% of patients receiving A. paniculata 1,200 mg and 1,800 mg daily, respectively, were in clinical remission at week 8, compared with 25% of those who received placebo (P=0.2582 for 1,200 mg vs. placebo and P=0.1011 for 1,800 mg vs. placebo). Adverse events developed in 60 and 53% of patients in the A. paniculata 1,200 mg and 1,800 mg daily groups, respectively, and 60% in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with mildly to moderately active ulcerative colitis treated with A. paniculata extract (HMPL-004) at a dose of 1,800 mg daily were more likely to achieve clinical response than those receiving placebo.

Efficacy of biological therapies in inflammatory bowel disease: systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) are inflammatory disorders of the gastrointestinal tract of unknown etiology. Evidence for treatment of the condition with biological therapies exists, but no systematic review and meta-analysis has examined this issue in its entirety. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane central register of controlled trials were searched (through to December 2010). Trials recruiting adults with active or quiescent CD or UC and comparing biological therapies (anti-tumor necrosis factor-α (TNFα) antibodies or natalizumab) with placebo were eligible. Dichotomous symptom data were pooled to obtain relative risk (RR) of failure to achieve remission in active disease and RR of relapse of activity in quiescent disease once remission had occurred, with a 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: The search strategy identified 3,061 citations, 27 of which were eligible. Anti-TNFα antibodies and natalizumab were both superior to placebo in inducing remission of luminal CD (RR of no remission=0.87; 95% CI 0.80-0.94 and RR=0.88; 95% CI 0.83-0.94, respectively). Anti-TNFα antibodies were also superior to placebo in preventing relapse of luminal CD (RR of relapse=0.71; 95% CI 0.65-0.76). Infliximab was superior to placebo in inducing remission of moderate to severely active UC (RR=0.72; 95% CI 0.57-0.91). CONCLUSIONS: Biological therapies were superior to placebo in inducing remission of active CD and UC, and in preventing relapse of quiescent CD.

Treatment and prevention of pouchitis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND: Pouchitis may occur following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis in approximately 30% of patients. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to determine the efficacy of medical therapies for pouchitis (including antibiotic, probiotic, and other agents) as substantiated by data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). SEARCH STRATEGY: A search for RCTs from 1966 to October 2009 was performed using the MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus databases. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled treatment or prevention trials of adult patients who underwent ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis who subsequently developed pouchitis or were at risk for pouchitis were considered for inclusion. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Extracted data were converted to 2X2 tables and then synthesized in to a summary statistic using the Peto odds ratio (OR) and [95% confidence intervals], or weighted mean difference (WMD), using RevMan-5 for Mac OS 10.6. MAIN RESULTS: Eleven RCTs fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. The efficacy of 10 different pharmacologic agents was assessed. For the treatment of acute pouchitis (4 RCTS, 5 agents), ciprofloxacin was more effective at inducing remission than metronidazole. Neither rifaximin nor lactobacillus GG were more effective than placebo, while budesonide enemas and metronidazole were similarly effective, for inducing remission of acute pouchitis. For the treatment and maintenance of remission of chronic pouchitis (4 RCTs, 4 agents), glutamine suppositories were not more effective than butyrate suppositories, and bismuth carbomer foam enemas were not more effective than placebo, while VSL#3 was more effective than placebo in maintaining remission of chronic pouchitis in patients with chronic pouchitis who achieved remission with antibiotics. For the prevention of pouchitis (3 RCTs, 2 agents), in one study VSL#3 was more effective than placebo while in another study VSL#3 was not more effective than no treatment. Allopurinol was not more effective than placebo, while inulin was more effective than placebo but the results were not clinically significant. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: For acute pouchitis, ciprofloxacin was more effective than metronidazole, while budesonide enemas and metronidazole were similarly effective. For chronic pouchitis, VSL#3 was more effective than placebo. For the prevention of pouchitis, VSL#3 was more effective than placebo. Larger RCTs are needed to determine the optimal agent(s) for the treatment and prevention of pouchitis.

How to avoid treating irritable bowel syndrome with biologic therapy for inflammatory bowel disease.

Some patients with an established diagnosis of Crohn's disease and symptoms compatible with a disease flare do not have evidence of active Crohn's disease by laboratory, endoscopic or radiographic criteria. In clinical trials, approximately 18% of patients with Crohn's disease and moderate to severe clinical symptoms have no evidence of ulceration at colonoscopy. There are multiple other causes of symptoms in patients with Crohn's disease, including the presence of disease complications (stricture, fistula and abscess), complications of surgical resection (bile salt diarrhea, steatorrhoea and small bowel bacterial overgrowth), concomitant irritable bowel syndrome, concomitant infections (Clostridium difficile, cytomegalovirus) and concomitant depression. In conclusion, the clinical impression of gastroenterologists based on the patient's history is frequently incorrect and is an insufficient basis for making therapeutic decisions. Colonoscopy and CT or MRI enterography should be employed routinely prior to any major changes in therapy: (1) before starting steroids, immunosuppressives or biologicals; (2) when patients fail to respond to steroids, immunosuppressives or biologicals; (3) when patients receiving maintenance therapy with immunosuppressives or biologicals relapse; (4) before surgery. Treatment of patients who have no evidence of active disease by imaging with steroids, immunosuppressives or biological agents will not address the cause of the symptoms and will expose the patient to risks that may be unnecessary. These patients should be systematically evaluated for bile acid diarrhoea, steatorrhoea, bacterial overgrowth, irritable bowel syndrome and depression.

Ciprofloxacin or metronidazole for the treatment of perianal fistulas in patients with Crohn's disease: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Although metronidazole and ciprofloxacin are used to treat perianal Crohn's disease (CD), no placebo-controlled trials have been performed. METHODS: We performed a placebo-controlled pilot trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of metronidazole and ciprofloxacin in patients with perianal CD. Twenty-five patients with CD and actively draining perianal fistulas were randomized to receive ciprofloxacin 500 mg, metronidazole 500 mg, or placebo twice daily for 10 weeks. Remission and response of perianal fistulas were defined as closure of all fistulas and closure of at least 50% of fistulas that were draining at baseline, respectively. The primary endpoint was remission at 10 weeks. RESULTS: Ten patients were randomized to ciprofloxacin, 7 to metronidazole, and 8 to placebo. Remission at week 10 occurred in 3 patients (30%) treated with ciprofloxacin, no patients (0%) treated with metronidazole, and 1 patient (12.5%) treated with placebo (P = 0.41). Response at week 10 occurred in 4 patients (40%) treated with ciprofloxacin, 1 patient (14.3%) treated with metronidazole, and 1 patient (12.5%) treated with placebo (P = 0.43). Termination of the trial prior to week 10 occurred in 1 patient (10%) treated with ciprofloxacin, 5 patients (71.4%) treated with metronidazole, and 1 patient (12.5%) treated with placebo (P < 0.02). No serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION: Remission and response occurred more frequently in patients treated with ciprofloxacin but the differences were not significant in this pilot study. Ciprofloxacin was well tolerated.