Actual 5-Year Survival After Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Patients with Peritoneal Carcinomatosis of Colorectal Origin.

BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive surgery and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) improves survival compared with chemotherapy alone in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) of colorectal (CRC) origin, however, long-term survival data are lacking. We report the actual survival of patients who underwent CRS/HIPEC for PC of CRC origin with a minimum potential 5-year follow-up period to identify factors that preclude long-term survival. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospective database, analyzing patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC for PC of CRC origin from 2007 to 2017. Patients with aborted CRS/HIPEC, postoperative follow-up <90 days, or non-CRC histology were excluded. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were measured from date of surgery. Surviving patients with <60 months of follow-up were censored at date of last follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 103 patients met inclusion criteria and were analyzed. CC score 0-1 was achieved in 89.3% of patients, and median peritoneal cancer index (PCI) was 9 (interquartile range [IQR] 5-17). Ninety-day mortality was 2.9%. The median follow-up of survivors was 88 months. Five-year OS was 36%, and median OS was 42.5 months. Factors independently associated with poor survival included high PCI (PCI = 14-20, hazard ratio [HR] 3.1, p = 0.007, and PCI > 20, HR 5.3, p ≤ 0.001) and incomplete CRS (CC score-2, HR 2.96, p = 0.02). Patients with low PCI (0-6) had 5-year OS 60.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Actual 5-year OS was 36% and median OS was 42.5 months. Our study demonstrates that patients with PC from CRC origin with low PCI who undergo complete surgical resection can achieve favorable long-term survival.

Association of Systemic Chemotherapy Approaches With Outcomes in Appendiceal Peritoneal Metastases.

INTRODUCTION: Many patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) for appendiceal adenocarcinoma peritoneal metastases (APM) undergo preoperative systemic chemotherapy. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate differences in oncologic outcomes among two popular chemotherapy approaches in patients with APM undergoing CRS-HIPEC. METHODS: We performed a multicenter retrospective review of patients who underwent CRS-HIPEC for APM due to high or intermediate grade disease between 2013 and 2019. Patients in the total neoadjuvant therapy group (TNT) received 12 cycles of preoperative chemotherapy. Patients in the "sandwich" chemotherapy group (SAND) received six cycles of preoperative chemotherapy with a maximum of six cycles of postoperative chemotherapy. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) defined as months from date of first treatment or surgery, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 39 patients were included in this analysis, with 25 (64%) patients in the TNT group and 14 (36%) patients in the SAND group. Patients in the TNT group had a median OS of 62 mo, while median OS in the SAND group was 45 mo (P = 0.01). In addition, patients in the TNT group had significantly longer RFS compared to the SAND group (35 versus 12 mo, P = 0.03). In a multivariable analysis, TNT approach was independently associated with improved OS and RFS. CONCLUSIONS: In this multicenter retrospective analysis, a TNT approach was associated with improved overall and recurrence-free survival compared to a sandwiched chemotherapy approach in patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC for high or intermediate grade APM.

A total neoadjuvant chemotherapy approach is associated with improved recurrence-free survival in patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases undergoing cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC.

BACKGROUND: The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the oncologic outcomes of two popular systemic chemotherapy approaches in patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases (CPM) undergoing cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC). METHODS: We performed a dual-center retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent CRS-HIPEC for CPM due to high or intermediate-grade colorectal cancer. Patients in the total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) group received 6 months of preoperative chemotherapy. Patients in the "sandwich" (SAND) chemotherapy group received 3 months of preoperative chemotherapy with a maximum of 3 months of postoperative chemotherapy. RESULTS: A total of 34 (43%) patients were included in the TNT group and 45 (57%) patients in the SAND group. The median overall survival (OS) in the TNT and SAND groups were 77 and 61 months, respectively (p = 0.8). Patients in the TNT group had significantly longer recurrence-free survival (RFS) than the SAND group (29 vs. 12 months, p = 0.02). In a multivariable analysis, the TNT approach was independently associated with improved RFS. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective study, a TNT approach was associated with improved RFS, but not OS when compared with a SAND approach. Further prospective studies are needed to examine these systemic chemotherapeutic approaches in patients with CPM undergoing CRS-HIPEC.

Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy does not increase risk of major complication or failure to rescue in cytoreductive surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Failure to rescue (FTR) is defined as death after a major complication. We evaluated FTR after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with and without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). METHODS: The ACS NSQIP database 2005-2018 was reviewed for all cases of CRS. Propensity score matching was used to compare outcomes between those undergoing CRS alone and those undergoing CRS/HIPEC. Patients were matched on age, sex, ascites, diabetes, hypertension and resection of liver, pancreas, colon/rectum, diaphragm, stomach, small bowel, and/or spleen. RESULTS: Thirty nine thousand one hundred and twenty-six patients underwent CRS; 38,387 underwent CRS alone; 739 underwent CRS/HIPEC. After matching there were 726 patients in each arm. Patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC had higher risk of reintubation (25 [3.4%] vs. 13 [1.8%] p = 0.049), urinary tract infection UTI (44 [6.1%] vs. 25 [3.4%] p = 0.019) and sepsis (73 [10.1%] vs. 44 [6.1%] p = 0.005). Patients in the CRS arm required more transfusions (229 [31.5%] vs. 176 [24.2%] p = 0.002). There was no significant difference in FTR between the CRS and CRS/HIPEC groups (11 [4.0%] vs. 6 [2.3%] p = 0.258), nor in the pooled incidence of major complications (275 [37.9%] vs. 262 [36.1%] p = 0.48). CONCLUSION: CRS/HIPEC is associated with increased rates of reintubation, UTI, and sepsis while CRS alone was associated with increased transfusion. However, the addition HIPEC to CRS did not increase the risk of pooled major complication or FTR.

Hypophosphatemia Is Associated With Postoperative Morbidity After Cytoreductive Surgery and Heated Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: A Retrospective Study.

INTRODUCTION: Hypophosphatemia following surgery is associated with a higher rate of postoperative complications; however, the significance of postoperative hypophosphatemia after cytoreductive surgery and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) is unknown. METHODS: A prospectively maintained database was queried for all patients who underwent CRS/HIPEC for any histology at the Mount Sinai Health System. The perioperative serum phosphate levels, postoperative complications, and comorbidities were compared between patients with or without major complications. RESULTS: From 2007 to 2018, 327 patients underwent CRS/HIPEC. Most of the patients had low phosphate levels on postoperative day (POD) 2, reaching a median nadir of 2.3 mg/dL on POD 3. Patients with major complications had significantly lower levels of serum phosphate on POD 5-7 compared with patients without complications, with median serum phosphate 2.2 mg/dL (IQR 1.9-2.4) versus 2.7 mg/dL, (IQR 2.3-3), P < 0.01. Hypophosphatemia on POD 5-7 was also more frequent in patients who developed an anastomotic leak, with median serum phosphate 2.2 mg/dL (IQR 1.9-2.6) versus 2.8 mg/dL (IQR 2.2-3.2), P = 0.001. On multivariate analysis, the number of organs resected at surgery, diaphragm resection, postoperative intensive care unit stay, and serum phosphate level <2.4 mg/dL on POD 5-7 were independently associated with a major complication after CRS/HIPEC. CONCLUSIONS: Following CRS/HIPEC, POD 5-7 hypophosphatemia is associated with severe postoperative complications and anastomotic leak.

Laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy is associated with improved perioperative outcomes: a single-center early experience propensity-matched analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The role of laparoscopy in cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) is not well established. Herein, we describe our early experience of laparoscopic CRS/HIPEC in patients with low-volume peritoneal disease compared to patients who underwent open CRS/HIPEC during the same time period. METHODS: Using a prospectively maintained database, patients who underwent laparoscopic CRS/HIPEC were compared to a control cohort of patients who underwent open CRS/HIPEC, matched for peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI), completeness of cytoreduction, and tumor histology. RESULTS: Between 2008 and 2017, 16 patients underwent laparoscopic CRS/HIPEC and were compared to a matched control cohort of 32 patients who underwent open CRS/HIPEC. Clinical and demographic data were similar between the groups. PCI, number of resected organs, and optimal cytoreduction rates were comparable. Patients who underwent laparoscopic experienced a lower estimated blood loss, (median, [IQR 1-3]); 150 mL, [50-300] vs. 100 mL, [50-125], p = 0.04, shorter length of stay (median [IQR 1-3]; 4 days [3-6] vs. 6 days [5-8], p < 0.01, and a lower 30-day complication rate (6.3% vs. 56.3%, p < 0.01). There was no difference in progression-free survival (p = 0.577) and overall survival (p = 0.472) between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary study demonstrates that laparoscopic CRS/HIPEC is feasible and safe for curative treatment in selected patients with low tumor volume. Minimally invasive CRS/HIPEC is associated with fewer postoperative complications and shorter length of stay. There was no difference in long-term oncological outcomes between the groups.

The role of molecular biomarkers in outcomes and patient selection for cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal metastases of colorectal origin.

BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) is effective in select patients with peritoneal metastases of colorectal (CRC) origin. The impact of different biomarkers in predicting recurrence after CRS/HIPEC is unclear. METHODS: Retrospective review of patients who underwent CRS/HIPEC for PC of CRC origin from 03/2007-08/2017. Molecular profile of the primary tumor was obtained from pathology reports, whenever available. RESULTS: Overall, 100 patients underwent CRS/HIPEC for peritoneal metastases of CRC origin. Most patients presented high grade tumor histology (G2/G3, n = 97, 97%), and a majority showed mucinous features (n = 61, 61%). At a median follow-up of 18 months, median DFS for the overall population was 13 months (95% CI 9.6, 16.4). Data reporting at least one mutational analysis was available in 64 patients. Microsatellite stability was detected in 42/50 (84%) patients, mKRAS in 25/51 (49%), and mBRAF in 5/35 (14.3%). On Kaplan-Meier analysis, BRAF was the only mutation associated with poor DFS (16 months, CI 95% 11.7-43.3 vs. 7 months, CI 95% 2.1-11.9, p = .008). On multivariate analysis, mBRAF independently predicted earlier recurrence (p = .032). CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis, mBRAF was independently associated with earlier recurrence in patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC for CRC, leading to dismal median DFS (7 months). Strict patient selection is advisable in these patients.

The importance of primary tumor origin in gastrointestinal malignancies undergoing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Appendiceal and colorectal cancers with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) can derive benefit from cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC). However, its role in gastric and small bowel malignancies remains undefined. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 251 gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas with PC which underwent CRS/HIPEC at our institution from 2007 to 2017. We compared outcomes of gastric, small bowel, appendiceal, and colorectal cohorts. RESULTS: Thirty-one gastric, 8 small bowel, 91 appendiceal, and 121 colorectal cohorts were included. More gastric cancers (90%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy than any other cohort, p = 0.002. Although colorectal had the lowest peritoneal cancer index (PCI) (9) and appendiceal the highest (16), all cohorts underwent similar rates of organ resection and complete cytoreduction. Length of stay (p = 0.005) and major perioperative morbidity (Clavien III/IV, p = 0.011) were significantly higher in gastric and small bowel. Median overall survival (OS, p < 0.001) was significantly shorter in gastric (13 months) and small bowel (9 months) than in appendiceal (33 months) and colorectal (42 months) cohorts. On multivariate analysis, complete cytoreduction and PCI score were significant predictors of OS, p < 0.05. CONCLUSIONS: Primary tumor origin significantly affects outcomes after CRS/HIPEC for gastrointestinal malignancies. Though there was a survival benefit in appendiceal and colorectal, gastric and small bowel survival was comparable to systemic chemotherapy.

Diaphragmatic Peritoneal Stripping Versus Full-Thickness Resection in CRS/HIPEC: Is There a Difference?

BACKGROUND: Pleural recurrence after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is rare and poorly delineated. Specifically, data are limited on the effect that diaphragmatic peritoneal stripping versus full-thickness resection has on the nature of ipsilateral pleural recurrence and postoperative morbidity. METHODS: Patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis who underwent CRS/HIPEC were included from a prospectively maintained database. The patients were divided into three cohorts based on surgical management of the diaphragm as follows: diaphragm-stripping (DS) cohort, full-thickness resection (FTR) cohort, and no diaphragm manipulation (ND) cohort. Postoperative morbidity and incidence of ipsilateral pleural recurrence were evaluated. All diaphragmatic defects were closed before abdominal chemoperfusion. RESULTS: The inclusion criteria were met by 409 CRS/HIPEC procedures: 66 in DS, 122 in FTR, and 238 in ND. Ipsilateral pleural recurrence rates did not differ significantly between the three cohorts (DS 6%, FTR 3%, ND 3%; p = 0.470). Postoperative respiratory complications and overall morbidity were significantly greater for the patients who underwent diaphragmatic disruption (stripping and/or resection) than for the patients who did not (p ≤ 0.0001), but the two groups did not differ in terms of 30-day mortality. However, comparison of FTR with DS showed no impact on major morbidity or pleural recurrence. CONCLUSION: Although patients undergoing surgical manipulation of the diaphragm during CRS/HIPEC experienced significantly greater morbidity, diaphragmatic stripping did not differ from full-thickness resection in terms of grades 3 and 4 complications or incidence of ipsilateral pleural recurrences. When deemed necessary to achieve complete cytoreduction, full-thickness diaphragmatic resection should be undertaken. In addition, the data support the observation that definitive repair of the diaphragmatic defect before abdominal chemoperfusion does not adversely influence ipsilateral pleural recurrence.

Improved Survival with Experience: A 10-Year Learning Curve in Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy and Cytoreductive Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) is an aggressive locoregional treatment for peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). Studies demonstrate improved perioperative and oncologic outcomes at high-volume centers. METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed all patients with PC from various malignancies who underwent attempted CRS/HIPEC at the authors' institution from 2007 to 2017. Clinicopathologic, perioperative, and oncologic outcomes of early (2007-2012) and late (2012-2017) experience were compared, and multivariate analyses for factors predictive of perioperative and oncologic outcomes were performed. RESULTS: The study enrolled 388 patients (157 early and 231 late). The late experience contained more appendiceal low-grade mucinous neoplasms (LGMNs; 21% vs 9%) and had a lower Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI; 10 vs 16). Moreover, achieving a similar rate of CC-0/1 required fewer organ resections, involved shorter operations (298 vs 347 min), and had lower estimated blood loss (EBL) (400 vs 200 ml) (p < 0.05). More procedures were aborted (20% vs 3%; p < 0.01). The late experience had fewer ICU admissions (13% vs. 55%) and a lower perioperative mortality rate (0% vs 3%) (p < 0.05). In the multivariate analyses, PCI and number of organ resections were independent predictors of multiple perioperative outcomes [EBL, operating room time, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, ICU length of stay (LOS), overall LOS]. Survival was significantly longer in the late cohort (median overall survival: NR vs 31 months; progression-free survival: 22 vs 11 months; p < 0.01), even after control for tumor histology. CONCLUSIONS: At the authors' high-volume center, with increased surgeon and institutional experience over time, perioperative and oncologic outcomes have improved significantly for patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC for PC.

Surveillance of Low-Grade Appendiceal Mucinous Neoplasms With Peritoneal Metastases After Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: Are 5 Years Enough? A Multisite Experience.

BACKGROUND: Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (LAMNs) are tumors that often present with widespread mucin in the peritoneal cavity (pseudomyxoma peritonei [PMP]). Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) are effective treatment, but no published recommendations exist regarding surveillance. METHODS: Data from prospective databases of patients who underwent CRS-HIPEC from 2001 to 2017 at two high-volume institutions were retrospectively analyzed. Patients who underwent complete CRS-HIPEC for PMP secondary to LAMN were included in the analysis. Pathologic examination confirmed the diagnosis of LAMN. Cases of mucinous adenocarcinomas and neuroendocrine tumors (goblet cell carcinoids) were excluded. RESULTS: The study enrolled 156 patients. The median peritoneal cancer index (PCI) was 18 (interquartile range IQR1-3, 12-23), and 125 patients (80.1%) had a CC0 cytoreduction. According to American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) grading, 152 patients (97.4%) presented with acellular mucin or G1 implants, 2 patients (1.3%) presented with G2 disease, and 2 patients (1.3%) presented with G3 disease. During the follow-up period (median, 45 months; IQR1-3 23-76 months), 23 patients (14.7%) experienced recurrence. All the recurrences were peritoneal and occurred within 5 years. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were respectively 95.5%, 83.4%, and 78.3%. Univariate Cox regression analysis showed that higher PCI scores (p < 0.001), a CC1 cytoreduction (p = 0.005), and higher preoperative levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) (p = 0.012) and CA-125 (p = 0.032) correlated with a shorter DFS. Only higher PCI scores independently predicted earlier recurrences (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Most patients had recurrence within 3 years after CRS-HIPEC, and none after 5 years. High PCI was the only independently significant variable. The study findings support intensive surveillance (every 3-6 months) with tumor markers and imaging methods during the first 3 years, and annual surveillance thereafter, with follow-up assessment after 5 years yielding limited benefit.

Assessing the Implementation of American College of Surgeons Quality Indicators for Pancreatic Cancer Across an Integrated Health System.

PURPOSE: The American College of Surgeons (ACS) recently published quality assurance (QA) indicators for pancreatic cancer care. Implementing quality indicators in a newly formed health system may lead to better patient selection and standardized cancer care. METHODS: Select ACS and internal quality indicators were implemented system wide in 2014. We compared compliance with these measures before and after their implementation at the main hospital and two new affiliate institutions. RESULTS: A total of 506 patients with pancreatic cancer were included. At the main hospital in the pre-QA period, 11 (12.6%) of 87 patients were discussed at our institutional multidisciplinary tumor board meeting; this number rose to 89 (49.7%) of 179 patients (P < .001) after the implementation. Clinical TNM stage was documented in the electronic medical record in 75 patients (86.2%) in the pre-QA group; this number rose to 170 (94.9%; P = .026) in the post-QA era. External imaging of patients undergoing resection was uploaded in 10 (66.7%) of 15 patient cases in the pre-QA period; this number rose to 33 (93.4%) of 35 (P = .020). Rates of time from diagnosis to treatment initiation shorter than 60 days were similar between eras (n = 26, 96.3% v n = 57, 95%). Implementation of QA measures at the affiliate institutions did not result in measurable differences. There were no differences in margin-negative resection rate, lymph node yield, or perioperative mortality after QA implementation at any site. CONCLUSION: The implementation of ACS quality indicators at our main hospital was feasible and effective for several measures, without delaying treatment. Instituting these indicators at lower-volume affiliates was more challenging.

More Synchronous Peritoneal Disease but Longer Survival in Younger Patients with Carcinomatosis from Colorectal Cancer Undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy to detect colorectal cancer (CRC) is recommended starting at age 50 years; however, CRC rates are increasing in the prescreening population. Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) has been proven effective in select patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) from CRC, although it has not been evaluated specifically in patients < 50 years. METHODS: CRC patients aged < 50 years at diagnosis undergoing CRS/HIPEC 2007-2017 were compared with those aged ≥ 50 years. Age distribution was analyzed in patients undergoing colectomy alone versus CRS/HIPEC for CRC 1993-2013. RESULTS: A total of 98 patients underwent CRS/HIPEC, of which 44% were < 50 years. Younger patients were more likely to present with synchronous peritoneal metastases (p = 0.050). Receipt of perioperative chemotherapy was comparable (p = not significant [NS]). Charlson Comorbidity Index and ECOG score were similar (p = NS). Tumor grade was similar (p = NS). Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Index, total organs resected, and anastomoses created were comparable (p = NS). Major Clavien-Dindo morbidity and LOS were similar (p = NS). Younger patients survived longer after CRS/HIPEC (p = 0.011). Demographic data from patients undergoing colectomy (n = 225) and CRS/HIPEC (n = 98) showed that age < 50 years was increasingly common with the more aggressive procedure (9% and 44% respectively, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Younger patients with PC from CRC presented more often with peritoneal metastases at the time of diagnosis. Yet despite similar perioperative features at CRS/HIPEC, they survived longer than older patients. Patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC are overall younger than those undergoing index colectomy.

Signet ring cell features with peritoneal carcinomatosis in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy are associated with poor overall survival.

BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) is effective in select patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). Signet ring cell (SRC) pathology is associated with poor prognosis. The role of CRS/HIPEC in this population is unclear. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with PC due to appendiceal (AC), colorectal (CRC), and gastric cancer (GC) undergoing CRS/HIPEC 2007-2016 were included. RESULTS: A total of 268 patients were referred for CRS/HIPEC. Of the 204 patients who underwent complete CRS/HIPEC, 101 (49.5%) had AC, 85 (41.7%) CRC, and 18 (8.8%) GC. Patients with GC had higher rates of SRC pathology than AC and CRC: 12 (66.7%) vs 16 (15.8%) and 10 (11.7%). The 3-year survival rate after CRS/HIPEC was 5.7% for the SRC group and 66.1% for the non-SRC group (P < 0.001). This was true for both AC and CRC subgroups (P < 0.001 for both). Overall, patients with SRC were more likely to have a peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) score > 15 (P = 0.046). Upon multivariate analysis of the SRC population, PCI > 20 (P = 0.007) and GC (P = 0.008) were found to be independent predictors of poor overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Performing CRS/HIPEC for PC from gastrointestinal malignancies presenting SRC features is recommended on patients with select diseases of appendiceal and colorectal origins.

Sites of Recurrence After Complete Cytoreduction and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Patients with Peritoneal Carcinomatosis from Colorectal and Appendiceal Adenocarcinoma: A Tertiary Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: This report describes patterns of disease recurrence after optimal cytoreduction (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) of colorectal (CRC) and appendiceal adenocarcinoma (AC) origin. METHODS: Patients undergoing optimal CRS/HIPEC (2007-2016) at the authors' institution were retrospectively reviewed from a prospectively maintained database. Data regarding disease recurrence were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 74 patients who underwent CRS/HIPEC for PC from CRC (n = 46) or AC (n = 28), 49 (66%) had recurrence during a median follow-up period of 39.5 months. The sites of recurrence were peritoneal-only (n = 34, 69%), hematogenous-only (n = 6, 12%), and combined peritoneal and hematogenous (n = 9, 19%) sites. No patients with AC had hematogenous-only recurrence. The median disease-free survival (DFS) time for all the patients was 15 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 12.5-17.5 months). The recurrence rate after CRS/HIPEC was 41% at 1 year, 73% at 3 years, and 76% at 5 years. All the patients with hematogenous-only metastases experienced recurrence within 12 months after CRS/HIPEC. Mucinous or signet ring features predicted peritoneal recurrence (p = 0.041), whereas a complete cytoreduction of 1 was a predictor of early recurrence (p = 0.040). Patients who underwent repeat cytoreduction survived longer than those who received systemic chemotherapy alone. The median survival time after peritoneal-only recurrence was 33 months (95% CI 27.8-38.9 months). CONCLUSION: Recurrence for patients with PC is common, even after optimal CRS/HIPEC. Hematogenous-only recurrence occurs early after CRS/HIPEC, suggesting occult disease at the time of treatment and highlighting the need for methods to identify micro-metastases and improve patient selection. Patients experiencing peritoneal-only recurrence had long survival period after CRS/HIPEC, suggesting its effectiveness at controlling peritoneal disease for a time.

Disparities in Access to Sorafenib in Communities with Low Socioeconomic Status.

OBJECTIVE: In the United States, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is more common among communities with low socioeconomic status (SES), and these groups tend to be diagnosed with later-stage cancers. Sorafenib is the primary treatment for advanced HCC, however its substantial cost raises concern for access to treatment. METHODS: The newly developed Case-Background method was used to estimate odds ratios for the impacts of various sociodemographic factors on sorafenib access in clinically eligible patients. Socioeconomic status was defined as a factor of median income and education level based on ZIP code of residence. RESULTS: There was a strong association between sorafenib prescription and residence in an area of higher SES. While controlling for age, race/ethnicity, and insurance status, high SES residence doubled the odds of sorafenib prescription (OR=2.05, p<.01). CONCLUSIONS: Low socioeconomic status communities appear to have a reduced chance of receiving the only effective treatment for advanced HCC.

Conflicting Data on the Incidence of Leukopenia and Neutropenia After Heated Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy with Mitomycin C.

BACKGROUND: During heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), neutropenia rates of 20 to 40% have been reported when mitomycin C (MMC) is dosed by weight or body surface area (BSA). This study investigated the authors' HIPEC experience using a fixed 40-mg dose of MMC, per consensus guidelines, and analyzed predictors for severe leukopenia and neutropenia. METHODS: Patients who underwent MMC-HIPEC from 2007 to 2016 at a single tertiary care center were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Among 314 MMC-HIPEC cases, 72 patients in the early era of the authors' program received routine prophylactic postoperative granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (GCSF). This early cohort had five severe leukopenic reactions and one neutropenic reaction. In the subsequent 242 cases without GCSF prophylaxis, severe leukopenia developed in 16 patients (7%), with neutropenia occurring in 11 (4.5%) of these cases. A history of prior systemic chemotherapy was noted in 9 (56%) of the 16 leukopenic patients compared with 112 (46%) of the patients who had no leukopenia (nonsignificant difference). The median nadir of leukopenia was 5 days (range 1-11 days). Of the 11 neutropenic patients, 6 received therapeutic GCSF, and 5 recovered without intervention. The 30-day postoperative mortality of the patients with leukopenia was 0%. CONCLUSION: In this study, the incidence of neutropenia after HIPEC with 40 mg of MMC was markedly lower than reported in the literature for doses adjusted by BSA or weight. The authors report that GCSF is not necessary for routine prophylaxis of all MMC-HIPEC patients. The findings suggest that a fixed 40-mg dose of MMC allows HIPEC to be performed with less risk of immunosuppression.

The effect of locoregional therapies in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: It is unknown whether the addition of locoregional therapies (LRTx) to sorafenib improves prognosis over sorafenib alone in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The aim of this study was to assess the effect of LRTx in this population. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of patients with advanced HCC as defined by extrahepatic metastasis, lymphadenopathy >2 cm, or gross vascular invasion. Sorafenib therapy was required for inclusion. Survival of patients who received LRTx after progression to advanced stage was compared to those who did not receive LRTx. RESULTS: Using an intention to treat analysis of 312 eligible patients, a propensity weighted proportional hazards model demonstrated LRTx as a predictor of survival (HR = 0.505, 95% CI: 0.407-0.628; P < 0.001). The greatest benefit was seen in patients with the largest tumor burden (HR = 0.305, 95% CI: 0.236-0.393; P < 0.01). Median survival in the sorafenib arm was 143 days (95% CI: 118-161) vs. 247 days (95% CI: 220-289) in the sorafenib plus LRTx arm (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate a survival benefit with the addition of LRTx to sorafenib for patients with advanced HCC. These findings should prompt a prospective clinical trial to further assess the role of LRTx in patients with advanced HCC.

Prophylactic hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with epithelial appendiceal neoplasms.

Background Prophylactic hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a promising approach for preventing peritoneal carcinomatosis in high-risk patients. We report our initial experience with prophylactic HIPEC in a series of patients with appendiceal neoplasms. Methods We retrospectively reviewed our prospectively maintained database to identify patients who underwent HIPEC in the absence of peritoneal disease. Patients with previously documented peritoneal surface disease were excluded. Data regarding clinical, operative and pathological features were analysed. Results Out of 322 HIPEC procedures performed between March 2007and August 2015, we identified 16 patients who underwent surgery with prophylactic intent. Primary diagnoses included high-grade and low-grade appendiceal neoplasms. Most patients presented originally with appendiceal perforation; all patients underwent initial surgery during which the appendix or right colon were resected. Following a median time interval of 2.2 months, a second surgery performed at our institution consisted of completion of omentectomy, partial colectomy and oophorectomy, with administration of prophylactic HIPEC (using mitomycin C). A totally laparoscopic approach was attempted and achieved in 11 patients in whom the median duration of surgery, estimated intraoperative blood loss and length of hospitalisation were 251 min, 100 cm(3) and 4 days, respectively. There were no cases of major perioperative morbidity or mortality. Conclusions Prophylactic HIPEC for appendiceal neoplasms is feasible, safe and may be performed laparoscopically. Larger studies with long-term follow-up are needed to determine whether a survival benefit is associated with this treatment.

Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with liver involvement.

BACKGROUND: We examined outcomes of patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) combined with liver resection. METHODS: All patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC between 2007 and 2014 were retrospectively reviewed: patients who underwent synchronous liver resection (group 1) were compared with those who did not (group 2) in terms of perioperative and long-term results. RESULTS: Group 1 included 103 patients with colorectal cancer (CRC, n = 28), appendiceal cancer (n = 34), and other malignancies. Compared with group 2 (n = 166), group 1 had higher number of organs resected, increased intraoperative blood loss, and longer hospital stay (all P ≤ 0.004) but similar major morbidity (24.3% vs. 18.1%, P = 0.22) and perioperative mortality rates. Two patients from group 1 developed liver resection-related complications. A comparison between patients who underwent parenchymal liver resection (n = 42) and matched pairs from group 2 with similar extent of cytoreduction did not yield significant differences in morbidity/mortality. CRC patients from group 1 had poorer median overall survival (45.1 vs. 73.5 months from stage IV diagnosis, P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Liver involvement denotes high peritoneal carcinomatosis burden, which often requires resection of multiple organs in order to achieve optimal cytoreduction. However, liver resection-related morbidity is low and overall morbidity/mortality rates are comparable to other extensive CRS/HIPEC procedures. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;113:432-437. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.