RESUMEN
Patients receiving psychiatric medication, like the antipsychotic drug haloperidol, are at an increased risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD). Haloperidol blocks the cardiac rapidly-activating delayed rectifier potassium current, thereby increasing electrical dispersion of repolarization which can potentially lead to arrhythmias. Whether these patients are also at a higher risk to develop SCD during an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is unknown. AMI locally shortens action potential duration, which might further increase repolarization dispersion and increase the risk of arrhythmia in the presence of haloperidol compared to without. Our aim was to test whether treatment with haloperidol implies an increased risk of SCD when eventually experiencing AMI. Twenty-eight female Danish Landrace pigs were randomized into three groups: low dose haloperidol (0.1 mg/kg), high dose (1.0 mg/kg) or vehicle-control group. One hour after haloperidol/vehicle infusion, AMI was induced by balloon-occlusion of the mid-left anterior descending coronary artery and maintained for 120 min, followed by 60 min of reperfusion. VF occurred during occlusion in 7/11 pigs in the control group, 3/11 in the low dose (p = 0.198) and 2/6 in the high dose group (p = 0.335). High dose haloperidol significantly prolonged QT, and reduced heart rate, vascular resistance and blood pressure before and during AMI. Premature ventricular contractions in phase 1b during AMI were reduced with high dose haloperidol. AMI-induced arrhythmia was not aggravated in pigs with haloperidol treatment. Our results do not suggest that AMI is contributing to the excess mortality in patients treated with antipsychotic drugs seen in epidemiological studies.
RESUMEN
Ventricular fibrillation (VF) during acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is an important contributor to sudden cardiac death. Large animal models are widely used to study AMI-induced arrhythmia, but the mode of AMI induction ranges from thoracotomy and surgical ligation of a coronary vessel (open chest) to minimally invasive techniques, including balloon occlusion (closed chest). How the choice of induction affects arrhythmia development is unclear. The aim of this study was to compare an open-chest and a closed-chest model with regard to hemodynamics, electrophysiology, and arrhythmia development. Forty-two female Danish Landrace pigs (20 open chest, 22 closed chest) were anesthetized, and occlusion of the mid-left anterior descending coronary artery was performed for 60 min. Opening the chest reduced blood pressure and cardiac output (Δ -22 mmHg, Δ -1.5 L/min from baseline, both P < 0.001 intragroup). Heart rate decreased with opening of the chest but increased with balloon placement (P < 0.001). AMI-induced ST elevation was lower in the open-chest group (P < 0.001). Premature ventricular contractions occurred in two distinct phases (0-15 and 15-40 min), the latter of which was delayed in the open-chest group (P = 0.005). VF occurred in 7 out of 20 and 12 out of 22 pigs in the open-chest and closed-chest groups, respectively (P = 0.337), with longer time-to-VF in the open-chest group (23.4 ± 1.2 min in open chest and 17.8 ± 1.4 min in closed chest; P = 0.007). In summary, opening the chest altered hemodynamic parameters and delayed the onset of ventricular arrhythmias. Hence, in the search for mechanisms and novel treatments of AMI-induced arrhythmia, caution should be taken when choosing between or comparing the results from these two models.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We demonstrated pronounced differences in hemodynamic parameters and time course of ventricular arrhythmias in regard to mode of infarct induction. Inducing myocardial infarction by thoracotomy and subsequent ligation decreased blood pressure and cardiac output and delayed the onset of ventricular arrhythmia, whereas balloon occlusion resulted in higher heart rates during infarct.