Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging ; 13(1 Pt 1): 44-54, 2020 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31103587

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Because risk stratification data represents a key domain of biomarker validation, we compared associations between outcomes and various cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) metrics quantifying myocardial fibrosis (MF) in noninfarcted myocardium: extracellular volume fraction (ECV), native T1, post-contrast T1, and partition coefficient. BACKGROUND: MF associates with vulnerability to adverse events (e.g., mortality and hospitalization for heart failure [HHF]), but investigators still debate its optimal measurement; most histological validation data show strongest ECV correlations with MF. METHODS: We enrolled 1,714 consecutive patients without amyloidosis or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy from a single CMR referral center serving an integrated healthcare network. We measured T1 (MOdified Look-Locker Inversion recovery [MOLLI]) in nonenhanced myocardium, averaged from 2 short-axis slices (basal and mid) before and 15 to 20 min after a gadolinium contrast bolus. We compared chi-square test values from CMR MF measures in univariable and multivariable Cox regression models. We assessed "dose-response" relationships in Kaplan-Meier curves using log-rank statistics for quartile strata. We also computed net reclassification improvement (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI for Cox models with ECV vs. native T1). RESULTS: Over a median of 5.6 years, 374 events occurred after CMR (162 HHF events and 279 deaths, 67 with both). ECV yielded the best separation of Kaplan-Meier curves and the highest log-rank statistics. In univariable and multivariable models, ECV associated most strongly with outcomes, demonstrating the highest chi-square test values. Native T1 or post-contrast T1 did not associate with outcomes in the multivariable model. ECV provided added prognostic value to models with native T1, for example, in multivariable models IDI = 0.0037 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.0009 to 0.0071), p = 0.02; NRI = 0.151 (95% CI: 0.022 to 0.292), p = 0.04. CONCLUSIONS: Analogous to histological previously published validation data, ECV myocardial fibrosis measures exhibited more robust associations with outcomes than other surrogate CMR MF measures. Superior risk stratification by ECV supports claims that ECV optimally measures MF in noninfarcted myocardium.


Asunto(s)
Amiloidosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Cardiomiopatía Hipertrófica/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagen por Resonancia Cinemagnética , Miocardio/patología , Volumen Sistólico , Función Ventricular Izquierda , Remodelación Ventricular , Anciano , Amiloidosis/mortalidad , Amiloidosis/patología , Amiloidosis/fisiopatología , Cardiomiopatía Hipertrófica/mortalidad , Cardiomiopatía Hipertrófica/patología , Cardiomiopatía Hipertrófica/fisiopatología , Medios de Contraste/administración & dosificación , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Fibrosis , Gadolinio/administración & dosificación , Compuestos Heterocíclicos/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Compuestos Organometálicos/administración & dosificación , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA