Management of the kidney transplant patient with Cancer: Report from a Multidisciplinary Consensus Conference.

INTRODUCTION: Cancer is the second most common cause of mortality and morbidity in Kidney Transplant Recipients (KTRs). Immunosuppression can influence the efficacy of cancer treatment and modification of the immunosuppressive regimen may restore anti-neoplastic immune responses improving oncologic prognosis. However, patients and transplant physicians are usually reluctant to modify immunosuppression, fearing rejection and potential graft loss. Due to the lack of extensive and recognised data supporting how to manage the immunosuppressive therapy in KTRs, in the context of immunotherapy, chemotherapy, radiotherapy and loco-regional treatments, a Consensus Conference was organised under the auspices of the European Society of Organ Transplantation and the Italian Society of Organ Transplantation. The conference involved a multidisciplinary group of transplant experts in the field across Europe. METHODS: The overall process included a) the formulation of 12 specific questions based on the PICO methodology, b) systematic literature review and summary for experts for each question, c) a two-day conference celebration and the collection of experts' agreements. The conference was articulated in three sessions: "Immunosuppressive therapy and immunotherapy", "Systemic therapy", "Integrated Therapy", while the final experts' agreement was collected with a televoting procedure and defined according to the majority criterion. RESULTS: Twenty-six European experts attended the conference and expressed their vote. A total of 14 statements were finally elaborated and voted. Strong agreement was found for ten statements, moderate agreement for two, moderate disagreement for one and uncertainty for the last one. CONCLUSIONS: The consensus statements provide guidance to transplant physicians caring for kidney transplant recipients with cancer and indicate key aspects that need to be addressed by future clinical research.

Long-term follow-up of bulking agents for stress urinary incontinence in older patients.

OBJECTIVE: Implantation of bulking agents represents a noninvasive procedure for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in all patients where a more invasive procedure may increase perioperative risks. The primary aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the efficacy over time of bulking agent implantation. As secondary aims, we evaluated long-term (patients' subjective) satisfaction rate, rate of de novo urinary symptoms, and the impact of urinary incontinence on the quality of life. METHODS: All patients who underwent implantation of bulking agents between 1999 and 2013 at Campus Bio-Medico of Rome were retrospectively considered eligible for this study. Patients were interviewed using two standardized questionnaires: International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form and Patient Global Impression of Improvement. Cure rate, improvement rate, failure rate, and the onset of new symptoms were also investigated through specific questions. The original group of patients was then divided into two subgroups according to follow-up time (group A: shorter than median follow-up; group B: longer than median follow-up). RESULTS: Sixty-three patients were enrolled. Mean follow-up was 8.3 ±â€Š3.5 years with a range of 3.5 to 18 years. Fifteen (24%) cured patients (cure rate), 12 (19%) improved patients (improvement rate), 36 (57%) failed treatment (failure rate). We reported an overall success rate of 43%. No differences were reported among groups in terms of overall success rate (42% vs 44% for group A and group B, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Bulking agent implantation is an effective treatment for people with intrinsic sphincter deficiency (type III SUI) and it is a valid alternative to more invasive surgeries in older patients. Moreover, it shows an overall success rate (43%) that remains high even after many years.