Baseline Interleukin-6 and -8 predict response and survival in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib monotherapy: an exploratory post hoc analysis of the SORAMIC trial.

PURPOSE: To explore the potential correlation between baseline interleukin (IL) values and overall survival or objective response in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) receiving sorafenib. METHODS: A subset of patients with HCC undergoing sorafenib monotherapy within a prospective multicenter phase II trial (SORAMIC, sorafenib treatment alone vs. combined with Y90 radioembolization) underwent baseline IL-6 and IL-8 assessment before treatment initiation. In this exploratory post hoc analysis, the best cut-off points for baseline IL-6 and IL-8 values predicting overall survival (OS) were evaluated, as well as correlation with the objective response. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients (43 male) with a median OS of 13.8 months were analyzed. Cut-off values of 8.58 and 57.9 pg/mL most effectively predicted overall survival for IL-6 and IL-8, respectively. Patients with high IL-6 (HR, 4.1 [1.9-8.9], p < 0.001) and IL-8 (HR, 2.4 [1.2-4.7], p = 0.009) had significantly shorter overall survival than patients with low IL values. Multivariate analysis confirmed IL-6 (HR, 2.99 [1.22-7.3], p = 0.017) and IL-8 (HR, 2.19 [1.02-4.7], p = 0.044) as independent predictors of OS. Baseline IL-6 and IL-8 with respective cut-off values predicted objective response rates according to mRECIST in a subset of 42 patients with follow-up imaging available (IL-6, 46.6% vs. 19.2%, p = 0.007; IL-8, 50.0% vs. 17.4%, p = 0.011). CONCLUSION: IL-6 and IL-8 baseline values predicted outcomes of sorafenib-treated patients in this well-characterized prospective cohort of the SORAMIC trial. We suggest that the respective cut-off values might serve for validation in larger cohorts, potentially offering guidance for improved patient selection.

Safety and toxicity of radioembolization plus Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: analysis of the European multicentre trial SORAMIC.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The benefits of combined systemic and liver-directed treatments in inoperable intermediate- or advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have yet to be defined. This article presents the planned safety analyses for the first 40 patients randomized to radioembolization with yttrium-90 ((90) Y) resin microspheres followed by sorafenib (n = 20) or sorafenib only (n = 20) in the SORAMIC study. METHODS: Patients identified for palliative treatment who were poor candidates for transarterial (chemo)embolization (including those failing TACE) with preserved liver function (Child-Pugh ≤B7) and ECOG performance status <2 were screened. Radioembolization was administered using a sequential lobar approach. On day 3 after the last radioembolization procedure, sorafenib 200 mg twice daily was initiated escalating to 400 mg twice daily 1 week later; a matching sorafenib dose schedule was initiated in the control arm. RESULTS: Patients were followed up for a median of 8.3 months. Median total implanted activity of (90) Y was 1.87 (range: 0.54-2.35) GBq. Patients received a similar intensity and duration of sorafenib in the combination-treatment arm (median daily dose 614 mg over 8.5 months) and control arm (557 mg over 9.6 months). The incidence of total (196 vs. 222) and grade ≥3 (43 vs. 47) adverse events was similar in combination-treatment arm and control arm respectively (P > 0.05). No significant differences in the number of total or grade 3/4 toxicities were recorded for: total bilirubin, albumin, liver enzymes, ascites, Child-Pugh, fatigue, hand-foot skin reaction, blood pressure or diarrhoea. CONCLUSIONS: Radioembolization followed by sorafenib appears to be as well tolerated as sorafenib alone.

L-Carnitine-supplementation in advanced pancreatic cancer (CARPAN)--a randomized multicentre trial.

BACKGROUND: Cachexia, a >10% loss of body-weight, is one factor determining the poor prognosis of pancreatic cancer. Deficiency of L-Carnitine has been proposed to cause cancer cachexia. FINDINGS: We screened 152 and enrolled 72 patients suffering from advanced pancreatic cancer in a prospective, multi-centre, placebo-controlled, randomized and double-blinded trial to receive oral L-Carnitine (4 g) or placebo for 12 weeks. At entry patients reported a mean weight loss of 12 ± 2.5 (SEM) kg. During treatment body-mass-index increased by 3.4 ± 1.4% under L-Carnitine and decreased (-1.5 ± 1.4%) in controls (p < 0.05). Moreover, nutritional status (body cell mass, body fat) and quality-of-life parameters improved under L-Carnitine. There was a trend towards an increased overall survival in the L-Carnitine group (median 519 ± 50 d versus 399 ± 43 d, not significant) and towards a reduced hospital-stay (36 ± 4d versus 41 ± 9d,n.s.). CONCLUSION: While these data are preliminary and need confirmation they indicate that patients with pancreatic cancer may have a clinically relevant benefit from the inexpensive and well tolerated oral supplementation of L-Carnitine.

Sorafenib therapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in advanced liver cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Sorafenib has become the treatment standard for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). It is not clear whether patients with advanced liver function impairment (Child B) and patients undergoing additional locoregional therapy may tolerate treatment with sorafenib and benefit. We aimed to evaluate the tolerability and efficiency of sorafenib in patients with advanced HCC and different stages of liver cirrhosis, and in combination with locoregional therapy. METHODS: In 50 patients with advanced HCC treated with sorafenib tolerability and efficiency of the therapy with respect to stage of liver cirrhosis, existence of extrahepatic tumor spread, and additional locoregional therapy were evaluated. RESULTS: Fifty patients with advanced HCC were treated with sorafenib, and 13 received additional locoregional therapy. Tolerability of the systemic treatment was moderate in all patients, with no significant differences between the subgroups, while the median survival was better in patients with Child A than Child B cirrhosis. CONCLUSION: Tolerability and toxicity of a systemic treatment with sorafenib are moderate in patients with liver cirrhosis in Child A or B. Prospective randomized studies are required to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of combined systemic and locoregional treatment approaches in patients with advanced HCC.

[Fulminant duodenal bleeding as first manifestation of a neuroendocrine carcinoma of the pancreatic head]. / Fulminante Duodenalblutung als Erstmanifestation eines neuroendokrinen Pankreaskopfkarzinoms.

CASE REPORT: A 73-year-old male patient presented with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. The reason was an arterial hemorrhage from a duodenal tumor that could only be stopped by an angiographic intervention. In the further staging, there was evidence for a neuroendocrine carcinoma of the pancreatic head with infiltration of the duodenum and hepatic metastases. Due to good differentiation (G1) a systemic biotherapy with octreotide LAR was induced. After recurrent bleeding with arrosion of a branch of the superior mesenteric artery, a duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection was performed. Afterwards, the systemic therapy was changed to a palliative chemotherapy with streptozotocin and 5-fluorouracil due to local progression of the disease and a Ki-67 index of 4% in the primary tumor. CONCLUSION: In about 0.7% of patients with neuroendocrine tumors, the lesion is located in the pancreas. At this site these entities are very heterogeneous. The majority are nonfunctional tumors without secretion of bioactive substances and the associated symptoms. About 60% of the patients present with advanced metastasized disease. The therapy depends on the local spread and histological grading as well as symptoms of the patient. The only curative option represents surgical resection. However, even in a palliative situation, there can be benefit for the patient in case of a tumor mass reduction of > 90%. Alternative therapies in the palliative situation are somatostatin analogs, a classic systemic chemotherapy, or locoregional interventional procedures.

Hepatocellular carcinoma--epidemiological trends and risk factors.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third most common cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide with about 600,000 patients dying from the disease annually. In 70-90%, HCC develops on the background of chronic liver cirrhosis or inflammation. Risk factors and etiologies vary among geographical regions. In regions with a high incidence the majority of cases are related to HBV and HCV hepatitis. In developed countries, in addition to virus-related HCC, high consumption of alcohol as well as non-alcoholic fatty liver disease often in the context of metabolic syndromes are the prevalent causes. Improvement in clinical management of patients with liver cirrhosis and the control of related complications are the key for the rising incidence of HCC. This review gives an overview on epidemiological trends and risk factors and their mechanisms involved in the hepatocarcinogenesis. Knowledge of these factors will help to improve current concepts for prevention, screening and treatment of this disease.

Hepatocellular carcinoma and liver cirrhosis: assessment of the liver function after Yttrium-90 radioembolization with resin microspheres or after CT-guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: To identify changes of liver function after single-fraction irradiation or yttrium-90 radioembolization ((90)Y-RE) of hepatocellular carcinoma associated with liver cirrhosis on the basis of laboratory data. METHODS AND MATERIALS: 24 patients with primary liver carcinoma and liver cirrhosis classified Child-Pugh A or B were treated either by image-guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) (12 patients) or by (90)Y-RE (12 patients). The following laboratory parameters were assessed 1 day before and 3 days, 6 weeks and 3 months after the intervention: total bilirubin and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGTP) as parameters of detoxification function, albumin and cholinesterase (ChE) as direct synthesis parameters, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alkaline phosphatase (AP) as indicators of liver tissue damage. Preinterventional values were taken as baseline, following values were calculated as percentage changes from the baseline value. Statistical analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon-matched pairs test, comparing postinterventional with preinterventional values. Differences were considered statistically significant with a p value <0.05. RESULTS: In all patients the median bilirubin, ALT, AP and albumin values remained within normal limits at any time of follow-up. AST levels in the RE group and GGTP in both groups have been already elevated over a normal range before the intervention, and in both groups both parameters showed a slight increase after interventions. ChE activity was lowered already in the baseline values and showed a further decrease 3 days after BT as well as 3 days and 6 weeks after RE, with final reconstitution to baseline values. All liver function test parameters showed mild changes shortly after radiation therapy but floating laboratory values recovering within 12 weeks to baseline values. Radiation or RE-induced liver disease was recorded in no patient. CONCLUSIONS: Liver function parameters show only mild changes shortly after intervention with recovery within 6-12 weeks to baseline values.