Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Br J Anaesth ; 121(1): 260-269, 2018 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29935581

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Experiences during anaesthetic-induced unresponsiveness have previously been investigated by interviews after recovery. To explore whether experiences occur during drug administration, we interviewed participants during target-controlled infusion (TCI) of dexmedetomidine or propofol and after recovery. METHODS: Healthy participants received dexmedetomidine (n=23) or propofol (n=24) in stepwise increments until loss of responsiveness (LOR1). During TCI we attempted to arouse them for interview (return of responsiveness, ROR1). After the interview, if unresponsiveness ensued with the same dose (LOR2), the procedure was repeated (ROR2). Finally, the concentration was increased 1.5-fold to achieve presumable loss of consciousness (LOC), infusion terminated, and the participants interviewed upon recovery (ROR3). An emotional sound stimulus was presented during LORs and LOC, and memory for stimuli was assessed with recognition task after recovery. Interview transcripts were content analysed. RESULTS: Of participants receiving dexmedetomidine, 18/23 were arousable from LOR1 and LOR2. Of participants receiving propofol, 10/24 were arousable from LOR1 and two of four were arousable from LOR2. Of 93 interviews performed, 84% included experiences from periods of unresponsiveness (dexmedetomidine 90%, propofol 74%). Internally generated experiences (dreaming) were present in 86% of reports from unresponsive periods, while externally generated experiences (awareness) were rare and linked to brief arousals. No within drug differences in the prevalence or content of experiences during infusion vs after recovery were observed, but participants receiving dexmedetomidine reported dreaming and awareness more often. Participants receiving dexmedetomidine recognised the emotional sounds better than participants receiving propofol (42% vs 15%), but none reported references to sounds spontaneously. CONCLUSION: Anaesthetic-induced unresponsiveness does not induce unconsciousness or necessarily even disconnectedness. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01889004.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia Intravenosa , Anestésicos Intravenosos , Sedación Consciente , Dexmedetomidina , Sueños/efectos de los fármacos , Hipnóticos y Sedantes , Despertar Intraoperatorio/psicología , Propofol , Estimulación Acústica , Adulto , Nivel de Alerta/efectos de los fármacos , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Voluntarios Sanos , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Masculino , Memoria/efectos de los fármacos , Desempeño Psicomotor/efectos de los fármacos , Reconocimiento en Psicología/efectos de los fármacos , Inconsciencia/inducido químicamente , Inconsciencia/psicología , Adulto Joven
2.
Br J Anaesth ; 121(1): 270-280, 2018 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29935582

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Studying the effects of anaesthetic drugs on the processing of semantic stimuli could yield insights into how brain functions change in the transition from wakefulness to unresponsiveness. Here, we explored the N400 event-related potential during dexmedetomidine- and propofol-induced unresponsiveness. METHODS: Forty-seven healthy subjects were randomised to receive either dexmedetomidine (n=23) or propofol (n=24) in this open-label parallel-group study. Loss of responsiveness was achieved by stepwise increments of pseudo-steady-state plasma concentrations, and presumed loss of consciousness was induced using 1.5 times the concentration required for loss of responsiveness. Pre-recorded spoken sentences ending either with an expected (congruous) or an unexpected (incongruous) word were presented during unresponsiveness. The resulting electroencephalogram data were analysed for the presence of the N400 component, and for the N400 effect defined as the difference between the N400 components elicited by congruous and incongruous stimuli, in the time window 300-600 ms post-stimulus. Recognition of the presented stimuli was tested after recovery of responsiveness. RESULTS: The N400 effect was not observed during dexmedetomidine- or propofol-induced unresponsiveness. The N400 component, however, persisted during dexmedetomidine administration. The N400 component elicited by congruous stimuli during unresponsiveness in the dexmedetomidine group resembled the large component evoked by incongruous stimuli at the awake baseline. After recovery, no recognition of the stimuli heard during unresponsiveness occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Dexmedetomidine and propofol disrupt the discrimination of congruous and incongruous spoken sentences, and recognition memory at loss of responsiveness. However, the processing of words is partially preserved during dexmedetomidine-induced unresponsiveness. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01889004.


Asunto(s)
Sedación Profunda/psicología , Dexmedetomidina/farmacología , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/farmacología , Percepción/efectos de los fármacos , Estimulación Acústica , Adulto , Dexmedetomidina/sangre , Discriminación en Psicología/efectos de los fármacos , Electroencefalografía/efectos de los fármacos , Potenciales Evocados/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/sangre , Masculino , Memoria/efectos de los fármacos , Propofol/farmacología , Desempeño Psicomotor/efectos de los fármacos , Reconocimiento en Psicología/efectos de los fármacos , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA