Cross-sectional increase of adherence to multidisciplinary tumor board decisions.

BACKGROUND: Cancer research has made great progress in the recent years. With the increasing number of options in diagnosis and therapy the implementation of tumorboards (TUBs) has become standard procedure in the treatment of cancer patients. Adherence tests on tumor board decisions are intended to enable quality assurance and enhancement for work in tumor boards in order to continuously optimize treatment options for cancer patients. METHODS: Subject of this study was the adherence of the recommendations made in three of 14 tumorboards, which take place weekly in the Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO) at the University Hospital Bonn. In total, therapy recommendations of 3815 patient cases were checked on their implementation. A classification into four groups has been made according to the degree of implementation. A second classification followed regarding the reasons for differences between the recommendation and the therapy which the patient actually received. RESULTS: The study showed that 80.1% of all recommendations in the three TUBs were implemented. 8.3% of all recommendations showed a deviance. Most important reasons for the deviances were patient wish (36.5%), patient death (26%) and doctoral decision, due to the patient's comorbidities or side effects of the treatment (24.1%).Interestingly, deviance in all three tumor boards in total significantly decreased over time. CONCLUSIONS: Aim of the study was to clarify the use of tumor boards and find approaches to make them more efficient. Based on the results efficiency might be optimized by increased consideration of patients` preferences, improved presentation of patient-related data, more detailed documentation and further structuring of the tumor board meetings.

[Adjuvant and palliative chemotherapy of colorectal cancer in Germany outside controlled trials]. / Adjuvante und palliative Chemotherapie des kolorektalen Karzinoms in Deutschland ausserhalb kontrollierter Studien.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Colorectal cancer is the second most common malignant tumour in Germany with an unfavorable prognosis especially in a locally advanced or metastasizing stage. Although adjuvant and palliative chemotherapy significantly improve 5-year survival, consensus recommendations have in the past been inadequately transformed into clinical practice. It was the aim of this study to analyse the implementation of existing guidelines in a cohort from a defined area of Germany. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a multicentre study done between January 2000 and January 2002, tumour stage, primary care, adjuvant or palliative chemotherapy and follow-up of 444 patients (216 males, 228 females) with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer were recorded. RESULTS: 301 patients had colonic and 143 patients rectal cancer. The median age at diagnosis was 65 11.3 years. 36 of 96 (38%) patients with stage II colon cancer and 66 of 87 (76%) with stage III disease received adjuvant chemotherapy. 8 of 51 (16%) patients with rectal cancer stage II and 22 of 38 (58%) patients with stage III underwent adjuvant radio- and chemotherapy. The 68 of 84 (81%) patients with stage IV CRC who received palliative chemotherapy were given almost exclusively 5-FU monotherapy. Initial or sequential combination chemotherapy with oxaliplatin or irinotecan were performed in only 24 of 84 (29%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Stage III colon cancer was predominantly treated according to the existing standard guidelines. In contrast combined radio- and chemotherapy for rectal cancer stage II and III was only performed in one third of the patients, another third receiving neither adjuvant radiation nor chemotherapy. Initial combined or sequential combined chemotherapy for metastasizing colorectal cancer was rarely performed.

MTX-induced white matter changes are associated with polymorphisms of methionine metabolism.

Methotrexate (MTX) is a folate antagonist inhibiting nucleic acid and methionine synthesis. Methionine is necessary for CNS myelination. In 42 patients with primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) treated with a systemic and intraventricular high-dose MTX-based polychemotherapy, the presence of a risk haplotype defined by polymorphisms influencing methionine metabolism referred a relative risk for CNS white matter changes of 4.7 (p = 0.001). The authors conclude that methionine metabolism influences MTX neurotoxicity.

Influence of cytokines, monoclonal antibodies and chemotherapeutic drugs on epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) and LewisY antigen expression.

MoAbs against tumour-associated antigens (TAA) may be useful for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Since an increased expression of TAA may lead to enhanced antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity we examined whether the cytokines IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12, interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha), IFN-gamma, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, macrophage colony-stimulating factor and tumour necrosis factor-alpha can influence EpCAM and LewisY expression on the surface of the colorectal carcinoma cell lines HT29, LoVo and SW480. We found that only IFN-alpha increased significantly whereas IL-4 decreased both EpCAM and LewisY expression. IFN-gamma significantly increased LewisY expression only. When tumour cells were treated with MoAb, the LewisY-specific MoAb BR55-2 down-regulated LewisY antigen expression, whereas MoAb 17-1A, which binds to EpCAM, up-regulated this TAA after 3 days of culture. The cytokines IFN-alpha or IFN-gamma combined with MoAb 17-1A enhanced further slightly the expression of EpCAM. In additional experiments with chemotherapeutic drugs commonly used for the treatment of colorectal cancer, we found that 5-fluorouracil, mitomycin-C and oxaliplatin up-regulated EpCAM and LewisY antigen expression. Raltitrexed enhanced LewisY and down-regulated EpCAM expression, whereas CPT-11 had no influence at all. The highest expression for EpCAM on HT29 cells was achieved by the combination of IFN-alpha, 5-fluorouracil and MoAb 17-1A. Our results may be useful for defining combinations of biological and chemotherapeutic drugs for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Further trials should evaluate to what extent these combinations enhance antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity.