Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Bull Cancer ; 105(9): 790-803, 2018 Sep.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30103904

RESUMEN

Despite being 60-years old now, 5-FU remains the backbone of numerous regimen to treat a variety of solid tumors such as breast, head-and-neck and digestive cancers either in neo-adjuvant, adjuvant or metastatic settings. Standard 5-FU usually claims 15-40% of severe toxicities and up to 1% of toxic-death. Numerous studies show a stiff relationship between 5-FU exposure and toxicity or efficacy. In addition, 5-FU pharmacokinetics is highly variable between patients. Indeed, 80% of the 5-FU dose is catabolized in the liver by dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) into inactive compounds. It is now well established that DPD deficiency could lead to severe toxicities and, thus, require dose reduction in deficient patients. However, despite dosage adaptation based on DPD status, some patients may still experience under- or over-exposure, leading to inefficacy or major toxicity. The "Suivi thérapeutique pharmacologique et personnalisation des traitements" (STP-PT) group of the "Société française de pharmacologie et de thérapeutique" (SFPT) and the "Groupe de pharmacologie clinique oncologique" (GPCO)-Unicancer, based on the latest and most up-to-date literature data, recommend the implementation of 5-FU Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in order to ensure an adequate 5-FU exposure.


Asunto(s)
Antimetabolitos Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Fluorouracilo/efectos adversos , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Antimetabolitos Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Antimetabolitos Antineoplásicos/farmacocinética , Deficiencia de Dihidropirimidina Deshidrogenasa/complicaciones , Dihidrouracilo Deshidrogenasa (NADP)/genética , Dihidrouracilo Deshidrogenasa (NADP)/metabolismo , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Monitoreo de Drogas , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Fluorouracilo/farmacocinética , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Neoplasias/metabolismo , Polimorfismo Genético , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Sociedades Médicas
2.
J Hepatol ; 68(6): 1163-1171, 2018 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29427728

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Idarubicin shows high cytotoxicity against hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cells, a high hepatic extraction ratio, and high lipophilicity leading to stable emulsions with lipiodol. A dose-escalation phase I trial of idarubicin_lipiodol (without embolisation) was conducted in patients with cirrhotic HCC to estimate the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and to assess the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of the drug, and the health-related quality of life achieved by patients. METHODS: Patients underwent two sessions of treatment with a transarterial idarubicin_lipiodol emulsion without embolisation. The idarubicin dose was escalated according to a modified continuous reassessment method. The MTD was defined as the dose closest to that causing dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in 20% of patients. RESULTS: A group of 15 patients were enrolled, including one patient at 10 mg, four patients at 15 mg, seven patients at 20 mg, and three patients at 25 mg. Only two patients experienced DLT: oedematous ascitic decompensation and abdominal pain at 20 and 25 mg, respectively. The calculated MTD of idarubicin was 20 mg. The most frequent grade ≥3 adverse events were biological. One month after the second session, the objective response rate was 29% (complete response, 0%; partial response, 29%) based on modified Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours. The median time to progression was 5.4 months [95% confidence limit (CI) 3.0-14.6 months] and median overall survival was 20.6 months (95% CI 5.7-28.7 months). Pharmacokinetic analysis of idarubicin showed that the mean Cmax of idarubicin after intra-arterial injection of the idarubicin-lipiodol emulsion is approximately half the Cmax after intravenous administration. Health-related quality of life results confirmed the good safety results associated with use of the drug. CONCLUSIONS: The MTD of idarubicin was 20 mg after two chemolipiodolisation sessions. Encouraging safety results, and patient responses and survival were observed. A phase II trial has been scheduled. LAY SUMMARY: There is a need for transarterial regimens that improve the responses and survival of patients with unresectable HCC. In this phase I trial, we showed that two sessions of treatment with a transarterial idarubicin_lipiodol emulsion without embolisation was well tolerated and gave promising efficacy in terms of tumour control and patient survival.


Asunto(s)
Antibióticos Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/tratamiento farmacológico , Idarrubicina/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Antibióticos Antineoplásicos/sangre , Antibióticos Antineoplásicos/toxicidad , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/sangre , Emulsiones , Aceite Etiodizado/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Humanos , Idarrubicina/sangre , Idarrubicina/toxicidad , Inyecciones Intraarteriales , Neoplasias Hepáticas/sangre , Masculino , Dosis Máxima Tolerada , Persona de Mediana Edad , Calidad de Vida , Seguridad , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Eur Radiol ; 26(2): 601-9, 2016 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26060065

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the relationship between the improved stability of an anticancer drug-lipiodol emulsion and pharmacokinetic (PK) profile for transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: The stability of four doxorubicin- or idarubicin-lipiodol emulsions was evaluated over 7 days. PK and clinical data were recorded after TACE with the most stable emulsion in eight unresectable HCC patients, after institutional review board approval. RESULTS: The most stable emulsion was the one that combined idarubicin and lipiodol (1:2 v:v). At 7 days, the percentages of aqueous, persisting emulsion and oily phases were 50-0-50, 33-0-67, 31-39-30, and 10-90-0 for the doxorubicin-lipiodol (1:1 v:v), doxorubicin-lipiodol (1:2 v:v), idarubicin-lipiodol (1:1 v:v), and the idarubicin-lipiodol (1:2 v:v) emulsion, respectively. After TACE, mean idarubicin Cmax and AUC0-24h were 12.5 ± 9.4 ng/mL and 52 ± 16 ng/mL*h. Within 24 h after injection, 40% of the idarubicin was in the liver, either in vessels, tumours, or hepatocytes. During the 2 months after TACE, no clinical grade >3 adverse events occurred. One complete response, five partial responses, one stabilisation, and one progression were observed at 2 months. CONCLUSION: This study showed a promising and favourable PK and safety profile for the idarubicin-lipiodol (1:2 v:v) emulsion for TACE. KEY POINTS: • Transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) regimens that improve survival in hepatocellular carcinoma are needed. • Improved emulsion stability for TACE resulted in a favourable pharmacokinetic profile. • Preliminary safety and efficacy data for the idarubicin-lipiodol emulsion for TACE were encouraging.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Quimioembolización Terapéutica/métodos , Aceite Etiodizado/administración & dosificación , Idarrubicina/administración & dosificación , Idarrubicina/farmacocinética , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Anciano , Antibióticos Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Antibióticos Antineoplásicos/farmacocinética , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA