Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Métodos Terapéuticos y Terapias MTCI
Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Br J Cancer ; 95(5): 581-6, 2006 Sep 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16880785

RESUMEN

The effects of sorafenib--an oral multikinase inhibitor targeting the tumour and tumour vasculature--were evaluated in patients with advanced melanoma enrolled in a large multidisease Phase II randomised discontinuation trial (RDT). Enrolled patients received a 12-week run-in of sorafenib 400 mg twice daily (b.i.d.). Patients with changes in bi-dimensional tumour measurements <25% from baseline were then randomised to sorafenib or placebo for a further 12 weeks (ie to week 24). Patients with > or =25% tumour shrinkage after the run-in continued on open-label sorafenib, whereas those with > or =25% tumour growth discontinued treatment. This analysis focussed on secondary RDT end points: changes in bi-dimensional tumour measurements from baseline after 12 weeks and overall tumour responses (WHO criteria) at week 24, progression-free survival (PFS), safety and biomarkers (BRAF, KRAS and NRAS mutational status). Of 37 melanoma patients treated during the run-in phase, 34 were evaluable for response: one had > or =25% tumour shrinkage and remained on open-label sorafenib; six (16%) had <25% tumour growth and were randomised (placebo, n=3; sorafenib, n=3); and 27 had > or =25% tumour growth and discontinued. All three randomised sorafenib patients progressed by week 24; one remained on sorafenib for symptomatic relief. All three placebo patients progressed by week-24 and were re-started on sorafenib; one experienced disease re-stabilisation. Overall, the confirmed best responses for each of the 37 melanoma patients who received sorafenib were 19% stable disease (SD) (ie n=1 open-label; n=6 randomised), 62% (n=23) progressive disease (PD) and 19% (n=7) unevaluable. The overall median PFS was 11 weeks. The six randomised patients with SD had overall PFS values ranging from 16 to 34 weeks. The most common drug-related adverse events were dermatological (eg rash/desquamation, 51%; hand-foot skin reaction, 35%). There was no relationship between V600E BRAF status and disease stability. DNA was extracted from the biopsies of 17/22 patients. Six had V600E-positive tumours (n=4 had PD; n=1 had SD; n=1 unevaluable for response), and 11 had tumours containing wild-type BRAF (n=9 PD; n=1 SD; n=1 unevaluable for response). In conclusion, sorafenib is well tolerated but has little or no antitumour activity in advanced melanoma patients as a single agent at the dose evaluated (400 mg b.i.d.). Ongoing trials in advanced melanoma are evaluating sorafenib combination therapies.


Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/uso terapéutico , Bencenosulfonatos/uso terapéutico , Melanoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Piridinas/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/toxicidad , Bencenosulfonatos/toxicidad , Cartilla de ADN , Femenino , Genes ras , Humanos , Masculino , Melanoma/irrigación sanguínea , Melanoma/genética , Melanoma/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Niacinamida/análogos & derivados , Compuestos de Fenilurea , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas B-raf/genética , Piridinas/toxicidad , Seguridad , Sorafenib
2.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 35(4): 745-9, 1996 Jul 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8690640

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: A prospective clinical trial was performed to assess the response and toxicity associated with the use of high dose radiation therapy, 5-fluorouracil, and cisplatin in patients with anal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with anal cancer without distant metastasis were eligible for this study. Radiation therapy consisted of 59.4 Gy in 33 fractions; a 2 week break in treatment was taken after 36 Gy had been given. A treatment of 5-fluorouracil, 1,000 mg/m2 per day intravenously, was given for the first 4 days of radiation therapy, and cisplatin, 75 mg/m2 intravenously, was given on day 1 of radiation therapy. A second course of 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin was given after 36 Gy of radiation, when the radiation therapy was resumed. RESULTS: Nineteen patients entered this study and received treatment. Thirteen (68%) had a complete response, 5 (26%) had a partial response, and 1 (5%) had stable disease. The patient with stable disease and one of the patients with a partial response had complete disappearance of tumor more than 8 weeks after completion of radiation therapy. Fifteen patients had toxicity of Grade 3 or higher: the worst toxicity was Grade 3 in eight patients, Grade 4 in six patients, and Grade 5 in one patient. The most common form of toxicity of Grade 3 or higher was hematologic. The one lethal toxicity was due to pseudomembranous colitis, which was a complication of antibiotic therapy for a urinary tract infection. CONCLUSION: Radiation therapy, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil resulted in an overall response rate of 95%. Significant toxicity occurred, an indication that this regimen is near the maximal tolerated dose. A Phase III clinical trial is planned in which radiation therapy, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil will be used as an experimental arm.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias del Ano/radioterapia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Neoplasias del Ano/tratamiento farmacológico , Cisplatino/administración & dosificación , Terapia Combinada , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Radioterapia/efectos adversos
3.
Semin Oncol ; 19(6): 742-51, 1992 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1334280

RESUMEN

Current therapies for the treatment of malignancies are associated with significant toxicity, as chemotherapy and radiation therapy do not discriminate between normal and malignant cells. One approach to ameliorating the toxicity associated with therapy is through the use of chemoprotective agents. This article reviews a variety of agents that have been evaluated as possible protectants, including WR-2721 and the colony-stimulating factors. It is hoped that the understanding of how to optimally use chemoprotective agents will lead to more tolerable treatments for patients, and possibly allow for dose-escalation, which may contribute to improvement in patient survival.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/antagonistas & inhibidores , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias/radioterapia , Protectores contra Radiación , Amifostina/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Citocinas/uso terapéutico , Ditiocarba/uso terapéutico , Evaluación Preclínica de Medicamentos , Humanos , Masculino , Protectores contra Radiación/farmacología , Protectores contra Radiación/uso terapéutico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA