Registration procedure for spatial correlation of physical energy deposition of particle irradiation and cellular response utilizing cell-fluorescent ion track hybrid detectors.

The hybrid technology cell-fluorescent ion track hybrid detector (Cell-Fit-HD) enables the investigation of radiation-related cellular events along single ion tracks on the subcellular scale in clinical ion beams. The Cell-Fit-HD comprises a fluorescent nuclear track detector (FNTD, the physical compartment), a device for individual particle detection and a substrate for viable cell-coating, i.e. the biological compartment. To date both compartments have been imaged sequentially in situ by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). This is yet in conflict with a functional read-out of the Cell-Fit-HD utilizing a fast live-cell imaging of the biological compartment with low phototoxicity on greater time scales. The read-out of the biological from the physical compartment was uncoupled. A read-out procedure was developed to image the cell layer by conventional widefield microscopy whereas the FNTD was imaged by CLSM. Point mapping registration of the confocal and widefield imaging data was performed. Non-fluorescent crystal defects (spinels) visible in both read-outs were used as control point pairs. The accuracy achieved was on the sub-µm scale. The read-out procedure by widefield microscopy does not impair the unique ability of spatial correlation by the Cell-Fit-HD. The uncoupling will enlarge the application potential of the hybrid technology significantly. The registration allows for an ultimate correlation of microscopic physical beam parameters and cell kinetics on greater time scales. The method reported herein will be instrumental for the introduction of a novel generation of compact detectors facilitating biodosimetric research towards high-throughput analysis.

Comparison of fluorescent tag DNA labeling methods used for expression analysis by DNA microarrays.

Gene expression profiling by DNA microarrays has found wide application in many fields of biomedical research. The protocols for this technique are not yet standardized, and for each given step in microarray analysis a number of different protocols are in use. As a consequence, results obtained in different laboratories can be difficult to compare. Of particular importance in this respect are the methods for the preparation of fluorescent cDNA probes that should quantitatively reflect the abundance of different mRNAs in the two samples to be compared. Here we systematically evaluate and compare five different published and/or commercial principles for the synthesis offluorescently labeled probes for microarray analysis (direct labeling, 77 RNA polymerase amplification, aminoallyl labeling, hapten-antibody enzymatic labeling, and 3-D multi-labeled structures). We show that individual labeling methods can significantly influence the expression pattern obtained in a microarray experiment and discuss the respective benefits and limitations of each method.