Assessment of relapse in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy using F-18-FDG-PET/CT.

PURPOSE: In patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC), cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is an evolving therapeutic approach with curative intention. The differentiation between posttherapeutic findings after HIPEC and relapse of PC is challenging. We evaluated the diagnostic value of F-18-FDG-PET/CT in patients with relapse of PC after HIPEC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 36 patients with recurring PC after HIPEC were examined on a whole-body PET/CT system (44 examinations). The examination included 3 D F-18-FDG-PET and contrast-enhanced CT. Images were assessed by two experienced readers regarding the presence and the extent of PC using the peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI). Imaging results were correlated with surgical findings or follow-up. RESULTS: Relapse was suspected in 40 of 44 examinations. Relapse was missed by F-18-FDG PET/CT in 4 patients and significantly underestimated in 8 patients. The diagnostic accuracy for the detection of PC on a patient basis was 91 %, the sensitivity was 91 % and the positive predictive value was 100 %. The mean PCI was 11.4 ±â€Š11.9 for PET/CT, 8.4 ±â€Š10.3 for CT and 16.6 ±â€Š15.0 in the case of surgical exploration. The extent of PC was underestimated by PET/CT and even more by CT alone (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The diagnostic value of F-18-FDG PET/CT after cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC in the detection of recurring PC is superior to contrast-enhanced CT. However, the quantification of the extent of PC is limited due to post-therapeutic tissue alterations. KEY POINTS: • Imaging of recurrent PC after HIPEC is challenging due to posttherapeutic tissue alterations.• The extent of recurrent PC after HIPEC is systematically underestimated by F-18-FDG PET/CT.• F-18-FDG PET/CT provides improved sensitivity for recurrent PC compared to contrast-enhanced CT.• The correlation of the extent of recurrent PC depicted by F-18-FDG PET/CT and surgical exploration is better than that of contrast-enhanced CT and surgical exploration.

Correlation of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging of peritoneal carcinomatosis and clinical outcome after peritonectomy and HIPEC after 3 years of follow-up: preliminary results.

PURPOSE: In patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis, cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is an evolving approach with curative intention. Previous studies indicate a correlation between preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and surgical findings regarding the extent of peritoneal carcinomatosis. The aim of this study was to assess retrospectively whether preoperative MRI can predict the outcome and is therefore a suitable tool for patient selection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen patients with laparoscopically proven peritoneal carcinomatosis were preoperatively examined using a 1.5-T whole-body MRI system. Results were correlated with surgical exploration. Follow-up was done by contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography and, if suspicious for recurring disease, laparoscopy or laparotomy. Survival time and interval to recurring disease were correlated with the preoperative peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) on MRI (Spearman's rank correlation). RESULTS: In five patients radical resection could not be achieved (PCI 34 ± 6.9); survival time was 78.2 ± 54.1 days. In seven patients recurring disease was found 430 ± 261.2 days after initial complete cytoreduction (PCI 11.6 ± 6.9); survival time was 765.9 ± 355 days. Two patients are still alive after 3 years. Two patients with initially complete cytoreduction are without recurring disease after 3 years (PCI 5 and 12). One patient was lost for follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Results of the preoperative MRI correlate well with the surgical PCI, postoperative resection status, and survival time. MRI might be a suitable technique for patient selection when considering peritonectomy and HIPEC. In our patients the outcome seems to correlate well with the extent of peritoneal carcinomatosis found by the preoperative MRI.

[Clinical comparison of Xylonest-Octapressin and Scandicain]. / Xylonest-Octapressin und Scandicain im klinischen Vergleich.

The local anaesthetics Xylonest 3% Octapressin and Scandicain have been clinically tested in a series of 220 consecutive patients. Both drugs were well tolerated. Xylonest gives an effect of middle long duration and produces sufficient ischaemia (1 hour). Scandicain is well suited for short interventions. Both drugs can be used in risk patients.