Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Métodos Terapéuticos y Terapias MTCI
Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Curr Med Res Opin ; 26(2): 355-63, 2010 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19995325

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hospital admissions (inpatient and emergency room) are a major source of medical costs for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) initially treated in the outpatient setting. Current CAP treatment guidelines do not differentiate between outpatient treatment with levofloxacin and moxifloxacin. OBJECTIVE: Compare health care resource use and medical costs to payers for CAP outpatients initiating treatment with levofloxacin or moxifloxacin. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: CAP episodes were identified in the PharMetrics database between 2Q04 and 2Q07 based on: pneumonia diagnosis, chest X-ray and treatment with levofloxacin or moxifloxacin. Subsequent 30-day risk of pneumonia-related hospital visits and 30-day health care costs to payers for levofloxacin vs. moxifloxacin treatment were estimated after adjusting for pre-treatment demographics, health care resource use and pneumonia-specific risk factors using propensity score and exact factor matching. RESULTS: A total of 15,472 levofloxacin- and 6474 moxifloxacin-initiated CAP patients were identified. Among 6352 matched pairs, levofloxacin treatment was associated with a 35% reduction in the odds of pneumonia-related hospital visits (odds ratio = 0.65, P = 0.004), lower per-patient costs for pneumonia-related hospital visits (102 dollars vs. 210 dollars, P = 0.001), lower pneumonia-related total costs (medical services and prescription drugs, 363 dollars vs. 491 dollars, P < 0.001) and lower total costs (1308 dollars vs. 1446 dollars, P < 0.001) vs. moxifloxacin over the 30-day observation period. LIMITATIONS: Although observational analyses of claims data provide large sample sizes and reflect routine care, they do have several inherent limitations. Since randomization of subjects is not possible, adequate statistical techniques must be used to ensure that patient characteristics are well-balanced between treatment groups. In addition, data may be missing or miscoded. CONCLUSIONS: CAP outpatients initiated with levofloxacin generated substantially lower costs to payers compared to matched patients initiated with moxifloxacin. The cost savings for patients initiated with levofloxacin were largely attributable to reduced rates of pneumonia-related hospitalization or ER visits.


Asunto(s)
Compuestos Aza/economía , Hospitalización , Levofloxacino , Ofloxacino/economía , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Neumonía/economía , Neumonía/terapia , Quinolinas/economía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Algoritmos , Atención Ambulatoria/economía , Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Antiinfecciosos/economía , Antiinfecciosos/uso terapéutico , Compuestos Aza/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/economía , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/terapia , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Femenino , Fluoroquinolonas , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Moxifloxacino , Ofloxacino/uso terapéutico , Pacientes Ambulatorios/estadística & datos numéricos , Quinolinas/uso terapéutico , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA