The Poisoning Information Database Covers a Large Proportion of Real Poisoning Cases in Korea

The poisoning information database (PIDB) provides clinical toxicological information on commonly encountered toxic substances in Korea. The aim of this study was to estimate the coverage rate of the PIDB by comparing the database with the distribution of toxic substances that real poisoning patients presented to 20 emergency departments. Development of the PIDB started in 2007, and the number of toxic substances increased annually from 50 to 470 substances in 2014. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with toxic exposure who visited 20 emergency departments in Korea from January to December 2013. Identified toxic substances were classified as prescription drug, agricultural chemical, household product, animal or plant, herbal drug, or other. We calculated the coverage rate of the PIDB for both the number of poisoning cases and the kinds of toxic substances. A total of 10,887 cases of intoxication among 8,145 patients was collected. The 470 substances registered in the PIDB covered 89.3% of 8,891 identified cases related to poisoning, while the same substances only covered 45.3% of the 671 kinds of identified toxic substances. According to category, 211 prescription drugs, 58 agricultural chemicals, 28 household products, and 32 animals or plants were not covered by the PIDB. This study suggested that the PIDB covered a large proportion of real poisoning cases in Korea. However, the database should be continuously extended to provide information for even rare toxic substances.

The Comparison of Sedative Efficacy and Safety of Oral Chloral Hydrate and Intramuscular Ketamine in Children for Primary Repair in Emergency Department

PURPOSE: To compare the sedation quality of oral chloral hydrate against intramuscular ketamine in children requiring primary repair in the emergency department. METHODS: Patients needing primary repair of lacerations (range 1.6 years of age) were blindly randomized to either chloral hydrate or ketamine groups. One group received intramuscular ketamine at 4 mg/kg and the other group received oral chloral hydrate at 50 mg/kg. Both groups received lidocaine for local anesthesia. Physiologic parameters (heart rate, blood pressure and respiratory rate), the time from sedation to recovery, and the degree of sedation as measured by the Ramsay sedation score and the Modified Aldrete recovery score were recorded during the treatment. Overall behavior and complication were assessed both at baseline and at the end of the treatment. RESULTS: Data are mean+/-SD. We enrolled 80 consecutive patients into the study; 39 received intramuscular ketamine and 41 were administered oral chloral hydrate. The two groups were similar with regard to age, sex, and body weights. No patient had a clinically significant change in vital signs and the time from sedation to recovery. Changes in the Modified Aldrete recovery score after sedation were not statistically significant. However, statistically significant differences were observed for the Ramsay sedation score at 15 minutes after sedation (4.89+/-0.32 versus 4.23+/-0.48; p=0.024). No differences at other time points achieved statistical significance in the Ramsay sedation score. CONCLUSION: Both oral chloral hydrate and intramuscular ketamine are safe and effective for the sedation of children requiring laceration repair in the emergency department.

Endoscopic Evaluation of Upper Gastrointestinal Injury in Patients with Noncaustic Drug Ingestion

PURPOSE: There have been few studies of the direct effect of a drug overdose on the gastrointestinal (GI) mucosa. This study evaluated the frequency of GI mucosal injury and the necessity for esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) in patients with non-caustic drug ingestion (DI). METHODS: Patients who presented to the emergency department with non-caustic DI from January 2001 to December 2003 were enrolled in this study. EGD was performed on the patients after acute toxicologic management. Those who did not consent to EGD were excluded. The EGD findings were analyzed according to the non-caustic drug that had been ingested. RESULTS: Among the 37 patients, 24 (65%) had significant endoscopic lesions. Endoscopic findings were gastric erosion (n=17), ulcers (n=5), esophageal erosion (n=1), and a gastric hemorrhage (n=1). Pesticides, rodenticides, salicylates, and high dose doxylamine (>5 g) were associated with drug-induced gastropathy. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that GI mucosal injury has been underestimated in DI patients and that a treatment for gastromucosal protection should be performed when the non-caustic ingested drug is a pesticides, a rodenticides, a salicylates or high-dose doxylamine.