Delivery validation of an automated modulated electron radiotherapy plan.

PURPOSE: Modulated electron radiation therapy (MERT) represents an active area of interest that offers the potential to improve healthy tissue sparing in treatment of certain cancer cases. Challenges remain however in accurate beamlet dose calculation, plan optimization, collimation method, and delivery accuracy. In this work, the authors investigate the accuracy and efficiency of an end-to-end MERT plan and automated delivery method. METHODS: Treatment planning was initiated on a previously treated whole breast irradiation case including an electron boost. All dose calculations were performed using Monte Carlo methods and beam weights were determined using a research-based treatment planning system capable of inverse optimization. The plan was delivered to radiochromic film placed in a water equivalent phantom for verification, using an automated motorized tertiary collimator. RESULTS: The automated delivery, which covered four electron energies, 196 subfields, and 6183 total MU was completed in 25.8 min, including 6.2 min of beam-on time. The remainder of the delivery time was spent on collimator leaf motion and the automated interfacing with the accelerator in service mode. Comparison of the planned and delivered film dose gave 3%/3mm gamma pass rates of 62.1%, 99.8%, 97.8%, 98.3%, and 98.7% for the 9, 12, 16, and 20 MeV, and combined energy deliveries, respectively. Delivery was also performed with a MapCHECK device and resulted in 3%/3 mm gamma pass rates of 88.8%, 86.1%, 89.4%, and 94.8% for the 9, 12, 16, and 20 MeV energies, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Results of the authors' study showed that an accurate delivery utilizing an add-on tertiary electron collimator is possible using Monte Carlo calculated plans and inverse optimization, which brings MERT closer to becoming a viable option for physicians in treating superficial malignancies.

Sci-Fri PM: Delivery - 12: Scatter-B-Gon: Implementing a fast Monte Carlo cone-beam computed tomography scatter correction on real data.

A fast and accurate MC-based scatter correction algorithm was implemented on real cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) data. An ACR CT accreditation phantom was imaged on a Varian OBI CBCT scanner using the standard-dose head protocol (100 kVp, 151 mAs, partial-angle). A fast Monte Carlo simulation developed in the EGSnrc framework was used to transport photons through the uncorrected CBCT scan. From the simulation output, the contribution from both primary and scattered photons for each projection image was estimated. Using these estimates, a subtractive scatter correction was performed on the CBCT projection data. Implementation of the scatter correction algorithm on real CBCT data was shown to help mitigate scatter-induced artifacts, such as cupping and streaking. The scatter corrected images were also shown to have improved accuracy in reconstructed attenuation coefficient values. In three regions of interest centered on material inserts in the ACR phantom, the reconstructed CT numbers agreed with clinical CT scan data to within 35 Hounsfield units after scatter correction. These results suggest that the proposed scatter correction algorithm is successful in improving image quality in real CBCT images. The accuracy of the attenuation coefficients extracted from the corrected CBCT scan renders the data suitable for adaptive on the fly dose calculations on individual fractions, as well as vastly improved image registration.

SU-E-I-04: Implementation of a Fast Monte Carlo Scatter Correction for Cone- Beam Computed Tomography.

PURPOSE: To improve image quality in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans by implementation of a fast and accurate MC-based scatter correction algorithm. METHODS: A Solid WaterTM phantom was imaged on a Varian OBI CBCT scanner using the standard-dose head protocol (100 kVp, 151 mAs, partial-angle). A fast Monte Carlo simulation developed in the EGSnrc framework was used to transport photons through the uncorrected CBCT scan. From the simulation output, the contribution from both primary and scattered photons for each projection image was estimated. Using these estimates, a subtractive scatter correction was performed on the CBCT projection data. This correction procedure was repeated iteratively, using the previous scatter corrected scan as input to the Monte Carlo simulation. RESULTS: Implementation of the scatter correction algorithm on real CBCT data was shown to help mitigate scatter-induced artifacts, such as cupping and streaking. The scatter corrected images were also shown to have improved accuracy in reconstructed attenuation coefficient values. In a region of interest centered on the Solid Water phantom, the number of voxels agreeing to within 10% of the theoretical attenuation coefficient increased from 46% to 97% after two iterations of the scatter correction. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the proposed scatter correction algorithm is successful in improving image quality in real CBCT images. The accuracy of the attenuation coefficients extracted from the corrected CBCT scan renders the data suitable for on-the-fly dose recalculations, as well as vastly improved image registration.

Clinic based transfer of the N(D,W)(60Co) calibration coefficient using a linear accelerator.

Ionization chambers used for reference dosimetry require a local secondary standard ionization chamber with a 60Co absorbed dose to water calibration coefficient N(D,W)(60Co) traceable to a national primary standards dosimetry laboratory or an accredited secondary dosimetry calibration laboratory. Clinic based (in-house) transfer of this coefficient to tertiary reference ionization chambers has traditionally been accomplished with chamber cross calibration in water using a 60Co beam; however, access to 60Co teletherapy machines has become increasingly limited for clinic based physicists. In this work, the accuracy of alternative methods of transferring the N(D,W)(60Co) calibration coefficient using 6 and 18 MV photon beams from a linear accelerator in lieu of 60Co has been investigated for five different setups and four commonly used chamber types.

Commissioning of an NRC-type sealed water calorimeter at METAS using 60Co gamma-rays.

As part of a collaborative project between the National Research Council of Canada (NRC) and the Swiss Federal Office of Metrology and Accreditation (METAS), a sealed water calorimeter was built at NRC and transferred to METAS. The calorimeter is operated at 4 degrees C and uses two thermistor probes in a sealed glass vessel containing high-purity water to measure the radiation-induced temperature rise. The various correction factors have been evaluated and the estimated standard uncertainty on the absorbed dose to water is 0.41%. An extensive set of measurements using 60Co gamma-rays was carried out at NRC and two ionization chambers were calibrated against the absorbed dose determined calorimetrically. The chambers were also calibrated against the NRC standard for absorbed dose. After transferring the calorimeter to METAS, a similar set of measurements was carried out using their 60Co beam and the same two ionization chambers were calibrated against the absorbed dose to water established at METAS. The discrepancy between the three sets of calibration coefficients was smaller than the estimated standard uncertainty of 0.47% on the ratio of any pair of calibration coefficients.

Comparing calibration methods of electron beams using plane-parallel chambers with absorbed-dose to water based protocols.

Recent absorbed-dose-based protocols allow for two methods of calibrating electron beams using plane-parallel chambers, one using the N(Co)D,w for a plane-parallel chamber, and the other relying on cross-calibration of the plane-parallel chamber in a high-energy electron beam against a cylindrical chamber which has an N(Co)D,w factor. The second method is recommended as it avoids problems associated with the Pwall correction factors at 60Co for plane-parallel chambers which are used in the determination of the beam quality conversion factors. In this article we investigate the consistency of these two methods for the PTW Roos, Scanditronics NACP02, and PTW Markus chambers. We processed our data using both the AAPM TG-51 and the IAEA TRS-398 protocols. Wall correction factors in 60Co beams and absorbed-dose beam quality conversion factors for 20 MeV electrons were derived for these chambers by cross-calibration against a cylindrical ionization chamber. Systematic differences of up to 1.6% were found between our values of Pwall and those from the Monte Carlo calculations underlying AAPM TG-51, and up to 0.6% when comparing with the IAEA TRS-398 protocol. The differences in Pwall translate directly into differences in the beam quality conversion factors in the respective protocols. The relatively large spread in the experimental data of Pwall, and consequently the absorbed-dose beam quality conversion factor, confirms the importance of the cross-calibration technique when using plane-parallel chambers for calibrating clinical electron beams. We confirmed that for well-guarded plane-parallel chambers, the fluence perturbation correction factor at d(max) is not significantly different from the value at d(ref). For the PTW Markus chamber the variation in the latter factor is consistent with published fits relating it to average energy at depth.