Homozygote inositol transporter knockout mice show a lithium-like phenotype.

OBJECTIVE: Lithium inhibits inositol monophosphatase and also reduces inositol transporter function. To determine if one or more of these mechanisms might underlie the behavioral effects of lithium, we studied inositol transporter knockout mice. We previously reported that heterozygous knockout mice with reduction of 15-37% in brain inositol had no abnormalities of pilocarpine sensitivity or antidepressant-like behavior in the Porsolt forced swim test. We now report on studies of homozygous inositol transporter knockout mice. METHODS: Homozygote knockout mice were rescued by 2% inositol supplementation to the drinking water of the dam mice through pregnancy and lactation. Genotyping was carried out by polymerase chain reaction followed by agarose electrophoresis. Brain free myo-inositol levels were determined gas-chromatographically. Motor activity and coordination were assessed by the rotarod test. Behavior of the mice was studied in lithium-pilocarpine seizure models for lithium action and in the Porsolt forced swim test model for depression. RESULTS: In homozygote knockout mice, free inositol levels were reduced by 55% in the frontal cortex and by 60% in the hippocampus. There were no differences in weight or motor coordination by the rotarod test. They behaved similarly to lithium-treated animals in the model of pilocarpine seizures and in the Porsolt forced swimming test model of depression. CONCLUSIONS: Reduction of brain inositol more than 15-37% may be required to elicit lithium-like neurobehavioral effects.

Inositol deficiency diet and lithium effects.

OBJECTIVES: A major hypothesis explaining the therapeutic effect of lithium (Li) in mania is depletion of inositol via inhibition of inositol monophosphatase. However, inositol is also present in the diet. Restriction of dietary inositol could theoretically enhance the effects of Li. METHODS: We used dietary inositol restriction in animal studies and also devised a palatable diet for humans that is 90% free of inositol. RESULTS: Dietary inositol restriction significantly augmented the inositol-reducing effect of Li in rat frontal cortex. Li reduced inositol levels by 4.7%, inositol-deficient diet by 5.1%, and Li plus inositol-deficient diet by 10.8%. However, feeding with the inositol-deficient diet did not enhance the behavioral effect of Li in the Li-pilocarpine seizure model. Fifteen patients participated in an open clinical study of the inositol-deficient diet: six rapid cycling bipolar patients responding inadequately to Li or valproate in different phases of illness; two Li-treated bipolar outpatients with residual symptomatology, and seven inpatient Li-treated bipolar patients in non-responding acute mania. The diet had a major effect in reducing the severity of affective disorder in 10 of the patients within the first 7-14 days of treatment. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that dietary inositol restriction may be useful in some bipolar patients, but controlled replication is necessary.