IL1R2 Blockade Alleviates Immunosuppression and Potentiates Anti-PD-1 Efficacy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive subtype of breast cancer with limited therapeutic options. IL1 receptor type 2 (IL1R2) promotes breast tumor-initiating cell (BTIC) self-renewal and tumor growth in TNBC, indicating that targeting it could improve patient treatment. In this study, we observed that IL1R2 blockade strongly attenuated macrophage recruitment and the polarization of tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) to inhibit BTIC self-renewal and CD8+ T-cell exhaustion, which resulted in reduced tumor burden and prolonged survival in TNBC mouse models. IL1R2 activation by TAM-derived IL1ß increased PD-L1 expression by interacting with the transcription factor Yin Yang 1 (YY1) and inducing YY1 ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation in both TAMs and TNBC cells. Loss of YY1 alleviated the transcriptional repression of c-Fos, which is a transcriptional activator of PDL-1. Combined treatment with an IL1R2-neutralizing antibodies and anti-PD-1 led to enhanced antitumor efficacy and reduced TAMs, BTICs, and exhausted CD8+ T cells. These results suggest that IL1R2 blockade might be a strategy to potentiate immune checkpoint blockade efficacy in TNBC to improve patient outcomes. Significance: IL1R2 in both macrophages and breast cancer cells orchestrates an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment by upregulating PD-L1 expression and can be targeted to enhance the efficacy of anti-PD-1 in triple-negative breast cancer.

Multiomics of HER2-low triple-negative breast cancer identifies a receptor tyrosine kinase-relevant subgroup with therapeutic prospects.

To provide complementary information and reveal the molecular characteristics and therapeutic insights of HER2-low breast cancer, we performed this multiomics study of hormone receptor-negative (HR-) and HER2-low breast cancer, also known as HER2-low triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), and identified 3 subgroups: basal-like, receptor tyrosine kinase-relevant (TKR), and mesenchymal stem-like. These 3 subgroups had distinct features and potential therapeutic targets and were validated in external data sets. Interestingly, the TKR subgroup (which exists in both HR+ and HR- breast cancer) had activated HER2 and downstream MAPK signaling. In vitro and in vivo patient-derived xenograft experiments revealed that pretreatment of the TKR subgroup with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (lapatinib or tucatinib) could inhibit HER2 signaling and induce accumulated expression of nonfunctional HER2, resulting in increased sensitivity to the sequential HER2-targeting, Ab-drug conjugate DS-8201. Our findings identify clinically relevant subgroups and provide potential therapeutic strategies for HER2-low TNBC subtypes.

Switching to anastrozole plus goserelin vs continued tamoxifen for adjuvant therapy of premenopausal early-stage breast cancer: preliminary results from a randomized trial.

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy, safety, and quality-of-life impact of switching adjuvant treatment in hormone receptor-positive primary breast cancer patients who are still premenopausal after 2-3 years of tamoxifen therapy to anastrozole plus goserelin as compared with continuing tamoxifen over a total period of 5 years. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Hormone receptor-positive, premenopausal, lymph node-positive, or tumor size ≥4 cm breast cancer patients who had received tamoxifen for 2-3 years were randomly assigned to continue tamoxifen treatment (TAM group) or switch to adjuvant anastrozole plus goserelin (ADD group) and continue treatment for another 2-3 years (total treatment duration 5 years). Endpoints evaluated were adverse events (AEs), changes in bone mineral density, quality of life, and disease-free survival-related events. RESULTS: A total of 62 patients (33 in the ADD group and 29 in the TAM group) were evaluated. Grade 3-4 drug-related AEs occurred in five patients (15.2%) in the ADD group vs none in the TAM group. In the ADD group, arthralgias were the most common AEs (5/33 patients; 15.2%), and three patients in this group were discontinued because of AEs. Treatment was temporarily suspended due to AEs in three patients (9.1%) in the ADD group and one patient (3.4%) in the TAM group. Compared with continuing TAM therapy, switching to anastrozole plus goserelin did not result in any worsening of bone mineral density or quality of life. During a median follow-up of 34 months, five patients (15.2%) in the ADD group had disease-free survival events vs four patients (13.8%) in the TAM group. CONCLUSION: For early-stage breast cancer patients who remain premenopausal following 2-3 years of adjuvant tamoxifen therapy, switching to anastrozole plus goserelin therapy was safe with tolerable adverse effects. However, it did not show superior efficacy compared to remaining on tamoxifen treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier NCT01352091).

Effects of adjuvant chemotherapy in T1N0M0 triple-negative breast cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with T1N0M0 breast cancers are considered to have an excellent prognosis, even in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), which is often associated with diminished recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival. Chemotherapy remains the only adjuvant treatment for TNBC, but evidence that adjuvant chemotherapy is beneficial for stage T1N0M0 TNBC patients is limited. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy and the benefit of taxanes in T1N0M0 TNBC patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cohort of 354 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed T1N0M0 TNBC between January 2008 and December 2015 were included from the Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed to compare patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy with/without taxane addition. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 45 months. Chemotherapy was used in 92.4% of patients. The 5-year estimated RFS rates of patients with and without adjuvant chemotherapy were 94.5% and 83.6%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, adjuvant chemotherapy and a lack of lymphovascular invasion were associated with a significant benefit for RFS. A significant RFS benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy was observed in T1c (hazard ratio, HR = 0.24, 95% CI [0.08-0.76], P = 0.014) but not in T1b (HR = 0.32, 95% CI [0.03-3.18], P = 0.330) subgroups. Addition of taxane to an anthracycline-based regimen was not significantly associated with improved RFS in T1N0M0 TNBC patients. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant chemotherapy improves recurrence-free survival in T1c TNBC patients but not in T1b. Anthracycline-based taxane-free regimens might be sufficient to achieve RFS benefits in T1N0M0 TNBC patients.

CCL20 triggered by chemotherapy hinders the therapeutic efficacy of breast cancer.

Chemotherapeutic resistance in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has brought great challenges to the improvement of patient survival. The mechanisms of taxane chemoresistance in TNBC have not been well investigated. Our results illustrated C-C motif chemokine ligand 20 (CCL20) was significantly elevated during taxane-containing chemotherapy in breast cancer patients with nonpathologic complete response. Furthermore, CCL20 promoted the self-renewal and maintenance of breast cancer stem cells (BCSCs) or breast cancer stem-like cells through protein kinase Cζ (PKCζ) or p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)-mediated activation of p65 nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) pathway, significantly increasing the frequency and taxane resistance of BCSCs. Moreover, CCL20-promoted NF-κB activation increased ATP-binding cassette subfamily B member 1 (ABCB1)/multidrug resistance 1 (MDR1) expression, leading to the extracellular efflux of taxane. These results suggested that chemotherapy-induced CCL20 mediated chemoresistance via up-regulating ABCB1. In addition, NF-κB activation increased CCL20 expression, forming a positive feedback loop between NF-κB and CCL20 pathways, which provides sustained impetus for chemoresistance in breast cancer cells. Our results suggest that CCL20 can be a novel predictive marker for taxane response, and the blockade of CCL20 or its downstream pathway might reverse the taxane resistance in breast cancer patients.

Prognostic value of a positive-to-negative change in hormone receptor status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the prognostic value of positive-to-negative changes in hormone receptor (HR) status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) in patients with HR-positive breast cancer. METHODS: Data from 224 stage II-III breast cancer patients with positive HR status before NCT who had residual disease in the breast after NCT were collected. HR status of the residual tumors was retested after NCT. A survival analysis was performed in 214 patients with adjuvant endocrine therapy regardless of post-NCT HR status. The survival analysis also examined other clinical and pathologic variables. RESULTS: In total, 15.2 % of patients had a positive-to-negative change in HR status after NCT, and this change was observed more frequently in HER-2-positive tumors than HER-2-negative tumors (P = 0.001). In 214 patients who had been treated with adjuvant endocrine therapy regardless of post-NCT HR status, the alteration in HR status was an independent factor for the prediction of a poorer disease-free survival (P = 0.026) and overall survival (P < 0.001) in the adjuvant endocrine therapy patients. The 5-year disease-free survival and overall survival rates were 43.5 % and 59.8 %, respectively, in patients with HR status conversion and 67.8 % and 82.5 %, respectively, in patients whose HR status remained positive (log rank test P = 0.003 and P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The switch of HR status after NCT is remarkable for HR-positive tumors. An HR-negative switch may identify patients who would benefit from alternative systemic therapies.

Adjuvant therapy of breast cancer with pirarubicin versus epirubicin in combination with cyclophosphamide and 5-fluorouracil.

We performed a retrospective study of 856 breast cancer patients in our hospital, to compare the therapeutic effect of pirarubicin with cyclophosphamide and 5-fluorouracil (CPF) with the standard epirubicin-based regimen (CEF) in adjuvant treatment of breast cancer. Patients were given cyclophosphamide and 5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m(2) each, and either pirarubicin 40 mg/m(2) or epirubicin 75-100 mg/m(2) , every 3 weeks, six cycles. A total of 233 patients used CPF and 623 patients used CEF regimen. The clinical and pathologic characteristics were well balanced between the two groups. The median follow-up time was 41 months, relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were similar in both groups, p = 0.561 and p = 0.783, respectively. No treatment-related congestive heart failure or death was observed in either group. Regardless of chemotherapy regimens, only tumor size, lymph node status, and ER status were predictive factors in multivariate survival analysis. In stratified analysis, the total hazard ratio estimate for RFS was 0.876 (95% CI 0.561-1.369; p = 0.562), not in favor of either regimen, and no significant difference was observed in any subgroups between the two treatment arms. Our study verified that 3 weekly CPF gives the same efficacy and safety as the standard CEF; both CPF and CEF are the effective regimens that can be used in adjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer.

Integrated gene expression profile predicts prognosis of breast cancer patients.

Gene expression data has in recent years demonstrated the superior capacity to predict the prognosis of breast cancer patients unreceiving adjuvant chemotherapy comparing to the information available from traditional clinical and pathological sources. Meanwhile, adjuvant chemotherapy can significantly improve survival of breast cancer. It would be inappropriate to ignore its effect on prognosis. We hypothesized that an integrated gene expression profile can predict the prognosis of breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Therefore, we screened the specific gene markers and constructed an integrated 24-gene signature by low-density microarray including the "poor signature" and genes related to resistance to chemotherapy. The gene signature stratified correctly patients into good prognosis group and poor prognosis group. In addition, the Kaplan-Meier analyses for disease-free survival as a function of the 24-gene signature showed highly significant differences between the two groups (Log Rank test P < 0.0001 = Univariate and multivariate Cox's proportional-hazards regression analyses indicated that the signature represents the strongest independent prognostic factor for breast cancer patients. When compared with single signature, such as Oncotype DX and 70 poor signature, the integrated signature showed more predominant power of predication in breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Such integrated signature will critically aid clinical decision making at the level of individualization for most breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.

Addition of adjuvant tamoxifen to cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil for premenopausal women with oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To study the value of adjuvant tamoxifen (TAM) in premenopausal women with oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer who received adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) polychemotherapy. METHODS: Four hundred and two premenopausal ER-positive breast cancer patients who received CMF chemotherapy between January 1990 and December 1999 were retrospectively studied. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were used to evaluate the clinical value of TAM therapy. The relationships between nodal status and TAM were also analysed. RESULTS: After a mean of 41 months of follow-up, 43 (13.7%) patients died of breast cancer and 68 (19.9%) patients suffered recurrence. There was a significant difference between TAM and non-TAM treatment groups for DFS (p=0.0058), but no significant difference for OS. For node-negative patients, there was no significant difference between the TAM and non-TAM treatment groups for either DFS or OS. For node-positive patients, the difference between TAM and non-TAM treatment groups was significant for both DFS and OS (p=0.0497 and p=0.0285, respectively). CONCLUSION: TAM resulted in additional benefit to premenopausal patients with node-positive ER-positive breast cancer who received the CMF polychemotherapy regimen.

Green tea inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) induction in human breast cancer cells.

Investigators have shown that green tea and its main catechin epigallocatechin-3 gallate (EGCG) may decrease the risk of cancer. Our previous study showed that green tea extract (GTE) as well as its individual catechin components inhibited MDA-MB231 breast cancer cell and human umbilical vein endothelial cell (HUVEC) proliferation. Further, GTE suppressed breast cancer xenograft size and decreased the tumor vessel density in vivo. In the current study, we investigated the effect of GTE on the major angiogenic factor vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in an in vitro experiment. GTE or EGCG (40 mg/L) significantly decreased the levels of the VEGF peptide secreted into conditioned media. This occurred in both HUVEC and human breast cancer cells and the effect was dose dependent. Furthermore, GTE and EGCG decreased the RNA levels of VEGF in MDA-MB231 cells. This inhibition occurred at the transcriptional regulation level and was accompanied by a significant decrease in VEGF promoter activity. We also showed that GTE decreased c-fos and c-jun RNA transcripts, suggesting that activator protein (AP)-1-responsive regions present in the human VEGF promoter may be involved in the inhibitory effect of GTE. Furthermore, GTE suppressed the expression of protein kinase C, another VEGF transcription modulator, in breast cancer cells. Inhibition of VEGF transcription appeared to be one of the molecular mechanism(s) involved in the antiangiogenic effects of green tea, which may contribute to its potential use for breast cancer treatment and/or prevention.