Prospective, multicenter study of spinal cord stimulation for relief of chronic back and extremity pain.

STUDY DESIGN: This prospective, multicenter study was designed to investigate the efficacy and outcome of spinal cord stimulation using a variety of clinical and psychosocial outcome measures. Data were collected before implantation and at regular intervals after implantation. This report focuses on 70 patients who had undergone 1 year of follow-up treatment at the time of data analysis. OBJECTIVES: To provide a more generalizable assessment of long-term spinal cord stimulation outcome by comparing a variety of pain and functional/quality-of-life measures before and after management. This report details results after 1 year of stimulation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The historically diverse methods, patient selection criteria, and outcome measures reported in the spinal cord stimulation literature have made interpretation and comparison of results difficult. Although short-term outcomes are generally consistent, long-term outcomes of spinal cord stimulation, as determined by prospective studies that assess multidimensional aspects of the pain complaint among a relatively homogeneous population, are not well established. METHODS: Two hundred nineteen patients were entered at six centers throughout the United States. All patients underwent a trial of stimulation before implant of the permanent system. Most were psychologically screened. One hundred eighty-two patients were implanted with a permanent stimulating system. At the time of this report, complete 1-year follow-up data were available on 70 patients, 88% of whom reported pain in the back or lower extremities. Patient evaluation of pain and functional levels was completed before implantation and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after implantation. Complications, medication usage, and work status also were monitored. RESULTS: All pain and quality-of-life measures showed statistically significant improvement during the treatment year. These included the average pain visual analogue scale, the McGill Pain Questionnaire, the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire, the Sickness Impact Profile, and the Back Depression Inventory. Overall success of the therapy was defined as at least 50% pain relief and patient assessment of the procedure as fully or partially beneficial and worthwhile. Using this definition, spinal cord stimulation successfully managed pain in 55% of patients on whom 1-year follow-up is available. Complications requiring surgical intervention were reported by 17% (12 of 70) of patients. Medication usage and work status were not changed significantly. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective, multicenter study confirms that spinal cord stimulation can be an effective therapy for management of chronic low back and extremity pain. Significant improvements in many aspects of the pain condition were measured, and complications were minimal.

Prognostic factors of spinal cord stimulation for chronic back and leg pain.

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been used for more than 20 years in the treatment of diverse pain conditions. Although recent studies have identified more clearly those conditions for which SCSoffers a favorable prognosis, the identification of a patient population in whom reasonably long-term success can be expected has been difficult. In an effort to improve patient selection and increase the overall success rate of treatment, we have examined various physical, demographic, and psychosocial variables as predictors of SCS outcome. The study population consisted of 40 patients with chronic low back and/or leg pain, 85% of whom were diagnosed with failed back surgery syndrome. Medical history and demographic data were collected as part of an initial assessment along with patient responses to the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory, the visual analogue pain rating scale (VAS), the McGill Pain Questionnaire, the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire, the Beck Depression Inventory, and the Sickness Impact Profile. Treatment outcomes were examined and found to improve significantly after 3 months of stimulation. Subsequent regression analysis revealed that patient age, the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory depression subscale D, and the evaluative subscale of the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQe) were important predictors of posttreatment pain status. Increased patient age and D subscale scores correlated negatively with pain status, as measured by the percentage of changes in pretreatment and posttreatment VAS scores, % delta VAS. In contrast, higher MPQe correlated with improved pain status. By the use of the following equation and the definition commonly associated with SCS success (at least 50% decrease in the VAS pain level), the success or failure of 3 months of SCS was correctly predicted in 88% of the study population. Our results suggest that patient age, Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory depression, and MPQe may be clinically useful in the prediction of pain status after 3 months of SCS in patients with chronic low back and/or leg pain. % delta VAS = 112.57 - 1.98 (D)-1.68 (Age) + 35.54 (MPQe).

Epidural spinal cord stimulation in the management of spasms in spinal cord injury: a prospective study.

Forty-eight spinal cord injury victims were implanted with an epidural spinal cord stimulation system to treat spasms that had not satisfactorily responded to medical therapy. All the patients were at least 6 months after the injury. The protocol included assessment by independent examiners preoperatively and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after the implant. Pre- and postoperative data collection included the frequency and severity of the spasms. Combining the frequency and intensity scores into a 'severity' score provided a more accurate clinical picture. No patient observed neurological deterioration following the surgical procedure or the neurostimulation treatment. A statistically significant reduction in the severity of the spasms was observed in the follow-up evaluations, with results that progressively increased in time. It is appears that spinal cord stimulation is an effective and safe alternative in the management of spasms in spinal cord injury victims. Its exact role in relation to intrathecal baclofen infusion and ablative procedures remains to be defined.

Totally implantable spinal cord stimulation for chronic pain: design and efficacy.

Neurostimulators used to treat chronic, intractable pain have evolved from technical developments in pacemaker technology. A totally implantable spinal cord stimulation (SCS) system was designed based on elements of a widely used cardiac pacemaker. This paper reports on the transformation of pacemaker technology for neurostimulation applications and presents results of using this system for the treatment of 90 patients with chronic, intractable pain of the low back and/or legs. Significant reduction in pain levels resulted from use of a totally implantable spinal cord stimulation system. Seventy percent of the patients experienced good or excellent pain relief at an average of 14.5 months after implant. Patients who used an automatic ON/OFF cycling mode of stimulation reported greater pain relief than patients who were stimulated continuously.