Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 14 de 14
Filtrar
1.
Clin Infect Dis ; 78(5): 1304-1312, 2024 May 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38207124

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis (TB) is a public health threat, with >80% of active TB in the United States occurring due to reactivation of latent TB infection (LTBI). We may be underscreening those with high risk for LTBI and overtesting those at lower risk. A better understanding of gaps in current LTBI testing practices in relation to LTBI test positivity is needed. METHODS: This study, conducted between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2019 at Kaiser Permanente Southern California, included individuals aged ≥18 years without a history of active TB. We examined factors associated with LTBI testing and LTBI positivity. RESULTS: Among 3 816 884 adults (52% female, 37% White, 37% Hispanic, mean age 43.5 years [standard deviation, 16.1]), 706 367 (19%) were tested for LTBI, among whom 60 393 (9%) had ≥1 positive result. Among 1 211 971 individuals who met ≥1 screening criteria for LTBI, 210 025 (17%) were tested for LTBI. Factors associated with higher adjusted odds of testing positive included male sex (1.32; 95% confidence interval, 1.30-1.35), Asian/Pacific Islander (2.78, 2.68-2.88), current smoking (1.24, 1.20-1.28), diabetes (1.13, 1.09-1.16), hepatitis B (1.45, 1.34-1.57), hepatitis C (1.54, 1.44-1.66), and birth in a country with an elevated TB rate (3.40, 3.31-3.49). Despite being risk factors for testing positive for LTBI, none of these factors were associated with higher odds of LTBI testing. CONCLUSIONS: Current LTBI testing practices may be missing individuals at high risk of LTBI. Additional work is needed to refine and implement screening guidelines that appropriately target testing for those at highest risk for LTBI.


Asunto(s)
Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud , Tuberculosis Latente , Tamizaje Masivo , Humanos , Tuberculosis Latente/diagnóstico , Tuberculosis Latente/epidemiología , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , California/epidemiología , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven , Adolescente , Anciano
2.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 10(5): ofad219, 2023 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37265669

RESUMEN

Background: Treatment of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) is highly effective at preventing active tuberculosis (TB) disease. Understanding LTBI treatment practices in US health system settings is critical to identify opportunities to improve treatment prescription, initiation, and completion, and thus to prevent TB disease. Methods: We assessed LTBI treatment practices among a cohort of adults after their first positive LTBI test (tuberculin skin test [TST] or interferon gamma release assay [IGRA]) between 2009 and 2018 at 2 large integrated health systems in California. We described the prescription, initiation, and completion of LTBI treatment (isoniazid [INH], rifampin, and rifamycin-INH short-course combinations) by demographic and clinical characteristics. We used multivariable robust Poisson regression to examine factors that were independently associated with treatment prescription and completion. Results: Among 79 302 individuals with a positive LTBI test, 33.0% were prescribed LTBI treatment, 28.3% initiated treatment, and 18.5% completed treatment. Most individuals were prescribed INH (82.0%), but treatment completion was higher among those prescribed rifamycin-INH short-course combinations (69.6% for INH + rifapentine and 70.3% for INH + rifampin) compared with those prescribed INH (56.3%) or rifampin (56.6%). In adjusted analyses, treatment prescription and completion were associated with older age, female sex, more comorbidities, immunosuppression, not being born in a high-TB incidence country, and testing positive with IGRA vs TST. Conclusions: LTBI treatment is underutilized, requiring tailored interventions to support treatment prescription and completion for patients with LTBI.

3.
Kidney Med ; 5(5): 100624, 2023 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37143487

RESUMEN

Rationale & Objective: Heart failure and chronic kidney disease (CKD) frequently coexist reflective of the strong interplay between these organ systems. A better understanding of the prevalence of different types of heart failure (preserved and reduced ejection fraction) and their subsequent mortality risks among advanced CKD patients would provide important epidemiologic insights and may pave the way for more focused and proactive management strategies. Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting & Population: Patients aged ≥18 years with incident CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate ≤45 mL/min/1.73 m2) with and without heart failure in a large integrated health care system in Southern California. Exposure: Heart failure, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Outcomes: All-cause and cardiovascular-related mortality within one year of CKD identification. Analytical Approach: HRs were estimated using Cox proportional-hazards model for risk of all-cause mortality and Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard model for risk of cardiovascular-related mortality within 1 year. Results: The study cohort included 76,688 patients with incident CKD between 2007 and 2017, of which 14,249 (18.6%) had prevalent heart failure. Among these patients, 8,436 (59.2%) had HFpEF and 3,328 (23.3%) had HFrEF. Compared with patients without heart failure, the HR for 1-year all-cause mortality was 1.70 (95% CI, 1.60-1.80) among patients with heart failure. The HRs were 1.59 (95% CI, 1.48-1.70) for patients with HFpEF and 2.43 (95% CI, 2.23-2.65) for patients with HFrEF. Compared with patients without heart failure, the 1-year cardiovascular-related mortality HR for patients with heart failure was 6.69 (95% CI, 5.93-7.54). Cardiovascular-related mortality HR was even higher among those with HFrEF (HR, 11.47; 95% CI, 9.90-13.28). Limitations: Retrospective design with a short 1-year follow-up period. Additional variables including medication adherence, medication changes, and time-varying variables were not accounted for in this intention-to-treat analysis. Conclusions: Among patients with incident CKD, heart failure was highly prevalent with HFpEF accounting for over 70% among patients with known ejection fraction. Although the presence of heart failure was associated with higher 1-year all-cause and cardiovascular-related mortality, patients with HFrEF were the most vulnerable.

4.
J Public Health Manag Pract ; 29(3): 345-352, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36867508

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: More than 80% of active tuberculosis in the United States is due to reactivation of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI), which can be prevented via screening and treatment. Treatment initiation and completion rates are low for patients with LTBI in the United States, and the barriers to successful treatment are poorly understood. DESIGN: We conducted semistructured qualitative interviews with 38 patients who were prescribed LTBI treatment (9 months isoniazid, 6 months rifampin, or 3 months rifamycin-isoniazid short-course combinations). We used purposeful sampling employing a maximum variation approach to obtain diverse perspectives of patients who did not initiate treatment, who did not complete treatment, and who completed treatment (n = 14, n = 16, and n = 8, respectively). Patients were asked about LTBI knowledge, experience regarding treatment, interactions with providers, and barriers they faced. Using a team coding model (2 coders/analysts), we developed deductively derived (a priori) codes based on our central research questions and inductively derived codes that emerged directly from the data. Analysis of our coding categories and relationships generated a hierarchy of key themes and subthemes. SETTING: Kaiser Permanente Southern California. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals 18 years or older who received a diagnosis of LTBI and prescribed treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: LTBI knowledge, attitudes toward LTBI, attitudes toward LTBI treatment, attitudes toward providers, and explanation of barriers. RESULTS: Most patients reported having limited knowledge of LTBI. In addition to the duration of treatment, barriers to initiation and completion included perceived lack of support, uncomfortable side effects, and pervasive minimization of the positive impact of treatment on their health. Many patients felt there was little incentive to overcome barriers. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, patient experience with LTBI treatment initiation and completion could be improved with patient-centered treatment and more frequent follow-ups.


Asunto(s)
Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud , Tuberculosis Latente , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Isoniazida/uso terapéutico , Tuberculosis Latente/tratamiento farmacológico , Tuberculosis Latente/diagnóstico , California , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Antituberculosos/uso terapéutico
5.
JMIR Public Health Surveill ; 8(12): e41529, 2022 12 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36446133

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Natural language processing (NLP) of unstructured text from electronic medical records (EMR) can improve the characterization of COVID-19 signs and symptoms, but large-scale studies demonstrating the real-world application and validation of NLP for this purpose are limited. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this paper is to assess the contribution of NLP when identifying COVID-19 signs and symptoms from EMR. METHODS: This study was conducted in Kaiser Permanente Southern California, a large integrated health care system using data from all patients with positive SARS-CoV-2 laboratory tests from March 2020 to May 2021. An NLP algorithm was developed to extract free text from EMR on 12 established signs and symptoms of COVID-19, including fever, cough, headache, fatigue, dyspnea, chills, sore throat, myalgia, anosmia, diarrhea, vomiting or nausea, and abdominal pain. The proportion of patients reporting each symptom and the corresponding onset dates were described before and after supplementing structured EMR data with NLP-extracted signs and symptoms. A random sample of 100 chart-reviewed and adjudicated SARS-CoV-2-positive cases were used to validate the algorithm performance. RESULTS: A total of 359,938 patients (mean age 40.4 [SD 19.2] years; 191,630/359,938, 53% female) with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection were identified over the study period. The most common signs and symptoms identified through NLP-supplemented analyses were cough (220,631/359,938, 61%), fever (185,618/359,938, 52%), myalgia (153,042/359,938, 43%), and headache (144,705/359,938, 40%). The NLP algorithm identified an additional 55,568 (15%) symptomatic cases that were previously defined as asymptomatic using structured data alone. The proportion of additional cases with each selected symptom identified in NLP-supplemented analysis varied across the selected symptoms, from 29% (63,742/220,631) of all records for cough to 64% (38,884/60,865) of all records with nausea or vomiting. Of the 295,305 symptomatic patients, the median time from symptom onset to testing was 3 days using structured data alone, whereas the NLP algorithm identified signs or symptoms approximately 1 day earlier. When validated against chart-reviewed cases, the NLP algorithm successfully identified signs and symptoms with consistently high sensitivity (ranging from 87% to 100%) and specificity (94% to 100%). CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate that NLP can identify and characterize a broad set of COVID-19 signs and symptoms from unstructured EMR data with enhanced detail and timeliness compared with structured data alone.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Masculino , SARS-CoV-2 , Procesamiento de Lenguaje Natural , Mialgia , Tos/etiología , Cefalea/etiología , Fiebre/etiología
6.
BMJ Open ; 12(10): e060358, 2022 10 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36316080

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Assess the association between tocilizumab administration and clinical outcomes among mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Large integrated health system with 9 million members in California, USA. PARTICIPANTS: 4185 Kaiser Permanente members hospitalised with COVID-19 pneumonia requiring invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). INTERVENTIONS: Receipt of tocilizumab within 10 days of initiation of IMV. OUTCOME MEASURES: Using a retrospective cohort of consecutive patients hospitalised with COVID-19 pneumonia who required IMV in a large integrated health system in California, USA, we assessed the association between tocilizumab administration and 28-day mortality, time to extubation from IMV and time to hospital discharge. RESULTS: Among 4185 patients, 184 received tocilizumab and 4001 patients did not receive tocilizumab within 10 days of initiation of IMV. After inverse probability weighting, baseline characteristics were well balanced between groups. Patients treated with tocilizumab had a similar risk of death in the 28 days after intubation compared with patients not treated with tocilizumab (adjusted HR (aHR), 1.21, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.50), but did have a significantly longer time-to-extubation (aHR 0.71; 95% CI 0.57 to 0.88) and time-to-hospital-discharge (aHR 0.66; 95% CI 0.50 to 0.88). However, patients treated with tocilizumab ≤2 days after initiation of IMV had a similar risk of mortality (aHR 1.47; 95% CI 0.96 to 2.26), but significantly shorter time-to-extubation (aHR 0.37; 95% CI 0.23 to 0.58) and time-to-hospital-discharge (aHR 0.31; 95% CI CI 0.17 to 0.56) compared with patients treated with tocilizumab 3-10 days after initiation of IMV. CONCLUSIONS: Among mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19, the risk of death in the 28-day follow-up period was similar, but time-to-extubation and time-to-hospital-discharge were longer in patients who received tocilizumab within 10 days of initiation of IMV compared with patients who did not receive tocilizumab.


Asunto(s)
Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Respiración Artificial , SARS-CoV-2
7.
Am J Nephrol ; 53(1): 32-40, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35016183

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Using a large diverse population of incident end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients from an integrated health system, we sought to evaluate the concordance of causes of death (CODs) between the underlying COD from the United States Renal Data System (USRDS) registry and CODs obtained from Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed among incident ESKD patients who had mortality records and CODs reported in both KPSC and USRDS databases between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2016. Underlying CODs reported by the KPSC were compared to the CODs reported by USRDS. Overall and subcategory-specific COD agreements were assessed using Cohen's weighted kappa statistic (95% CI). Proportions of positive and negative agreement were also determined. RESULTS: Among 4,188 ESKD patient deaths, 4,118 patients had CODs recorded in both KPSC and USRDS. The most common KPSC CODs were circulatory system diseases (35.7%), endocrine/nutritional/metabolic diseases (24.2%), genitourinary diseases (12.9%), and neoplasms (9.6%). Most common USRDS CODs were cardiac disease (46.9%), withdrawal from dialysis (12.6%), and infection (10.1%). Of 2,593 records with causes listed NOT as "Other," 453 (17.4%) had no agreement in CODs between the USRDS and the underlying, secondary, tertiary, or quaternary causes recorded by KPSC. In comparing CODs recorded within KPSC to the USRDS, Cohen's weighted kappa (95% CI) was 0.20 (0.18-0.22) with overall agreement of 36.4%. CONCLUSION: Among an incident ESKD population with mortality records, we found that there was only fair or slight agreement between CODs reported between the USRDS registry and KPSC, a large integrated health care system.


Asunto(s)
Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud , Fallo Renal Crónico , Causas de Muerte , Femenino , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/epidemiología , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Masculino , Diálisis Renal , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
8.
Pilot Feasibility Stud ; 7(1): 172, 2021 Sep 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34493322

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Prolonged sitting increases the risk of cardio-metabolic disease. Office-based employees are particularly susceptible to high rates of this sedentary behaviour during work hours. Laboratory studies indicate that regularly interrupting periods of prolonged sitting with short bouts (2 min) of physical activity can improve markers of cardio-metabolic health. This method of interrupting sitting time is yet to be tested in an occupational setting and may provide an alternative to providing sit-to-stand desks. Drawing on the Behaviour Change Wheel and evidence on the barriers and motivators to performing regular activity breaks, the Move More @ Work intervention was developed. The objectives of this pilot study are to examine the feasibility, and preliminary outcomes, of this intervention designed to encourage participants to perform 1-2 min of activity after every 30 min of continuous sitting throughout the work day. The study will inform if progress to a full effectiveness trial is warranted. METHODS: An interrupted time series design consisting of a 4-week baseline (control period), a 12-week intervention, and a 12-week follow-up will be utilised. At least 57 university employees who self-report spending > 5 h per day sitting at work on at least 3 days per week will be recruited to participate. The intervention consists of (1) a structured consultation with a Move More @ Work coach, containing a number of behaviour change techniques to create an individualised plan of how to incorporate the activity breaks into the working day, and (2) strategies to create a supportive workplace culture for performing the activity breaks. Feasibility will be assessed by recruitment and retention rates, and acceptability of the intervention. Pilot outcomes are the number of regular activity breaks taken during the workday, cardio-metabolic risk score and self-reported health, and work-related productivity outcomes. DISCUSSION: If the Move More @ Work intervention is shown to be feasible, acceptable, and shows evidence of effectiveness, this will provide justification for the progression to a full scale evaluation of the intervention. In the longer-term, this intervention may provide an alternative means of improving health outcomes through interrupting sedentary time than that offered by current sedentary behaviour interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12620000354987 . Registered on 12 March 2020.

9.
Am J Kidney Dis ; 77(5): 704-712, 2021 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33010357

RESUMEN

RATIONAL & OBJECTIVE: Beta-blockers are recommended for patients with heart failure (HF) but their benefit in the dialysis population is uncertain. Beta-blockers are heterogeneous, including with respect to their removal by hemodialysis. We sought to evaluate whether ß-blocker use and their dialyzability characteristics were associated with early mortality among patients with chronic kidney disease with HF who transitioned to dialysis. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Adults patients with chronic kidney disease (aged≥18 years) and HF who initiated either hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis during January 1, 2007, to June 30, 2016, within an integrated health system were included. EXPOSURES: Patients were considered treated with ß-blockers if they had a quantity of drug dispensed covering the dialysis transition date. OUTCOMES: All-cause mortality within 6 months and 1 year or hospitalization within 6 months after transition to maintenance dialysis. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Inverse probability of treatment weights using propensity scores was used to balance covariates between treatment groups. Cox proportional hazard analysis and logistic regression were used to investigate the association between ß-blocker use and study outcomes. RESULTS: 3,503 patients were included in the study. There were 2,115 (60.4%) patients using ß-blockers at transition. Compared with nonusers, the HR for all-cause mortality within 6 months was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.65-0.94) among users of any ß-blocker and 0.68 (95% CI, 0.53-0.88) among users of metoprolol at transition. There were no observed differences in all-cause or cardiovascular-related hospitalization. LIMITATIONS: The observational nature of our study could not fully account for residual confounding. CONCLUSIONS: Beta-blockers were associated with a lower rate of mortality among incident hemodialysis patients with HF. Similar associations were not observed for hospitalizations within the first 6 months following transition to dialysis.


Asunto(s)
Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapéutico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/tratamiento farmacológico , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Mortalidad , Diálisis Renal , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/metabolismo , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Atenolol/metabolismo , Atenolol/uso terapéutico , Bisoprolol/metabolismo , Bisoprolol/uso terapéutico , Carvedilol/metabolismo , Carvedilol/uso terapéutico , Causas de Muerte , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/complicaciones , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/complicaciones , Labetalol/metabolismo , Labetalol/uso terapéutico , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Metoprolol/metabolismo , Metoprolol/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nadolol/metabolismo , Nadolol/uso terapéutico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Propranolol/metabolismo , Propranolol/uso terapéutico , Factores Protectores , Estudios Retrospectivos , Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo
10.
Ann Intern Med ; 173(10): 773-781, 2020 11 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32783686

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Obesity, race/ethnicity, and other correlated characteristics have emerged as high-profile risk factors for adverse coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-associated outcomes, yet studies have not adequately disentangled their effects. OBJECTIVE: To determine the adjusted effect of body mass index (BMI), associated comorbidities, time, neighborhood-level sociodemographic factors, and other factors on risk for death due to COVID-19. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Kaiser Permanente Southern California, a large integrated health care organization. PATIENTS: Kaiser Permanente Southern California members diagnosed with COVID-19 from 13 February to 2 May 2020. MEASUREMENTS: Multivariable Poisson regression estimated the adjusted effect of BMI and other factors on risk for death at 21 days; models were also stratified by age and sex. RESULTS: Among 6916 patients with COVID-19, there was a J-shaped association between BMI and risk for death, even after adjustment for obesity-related comorbidities. Compared with patients with a BMI of 18.5 to 24 kg/m2, those with BMIs of 40 to 44 kg/m2 and greater than 45 kg/m2 had relative risks of 2.68 (95% CI, 1.43 to 5.04) and 4.18 (CI, 2.12 to 8.26), respectively. This risk was most striking among those aged 60 years or younger and men. Increased risk for death associated with Black or Latino race/ethnicity or other sociodemographic characteristics was not detected. LIMITATION: Deaths occurring outside a health care setting and not captured in membership files may have been missed. CONCLUSION: Obesity plays a profound role in risk for death from COVID-19, particularly in male patients and younger populations. Our capitated system with more equalized health care access may explain the absence of effect of racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities on death. Our data highlight the leading role of severe obesity over correlated risk factors, providing a target for early intervention. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Roche-Genentech.


Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus , Infecciones por Coronavirus/mortalidad , Obesidad/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/mortalidad , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Asma/epidemiología , Índice de Masa Corporal , COVID-19 , California/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Comorbilidad , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Hiperlipidemias/epidemiología , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2 , Factores Sexuales , Adulto Joven
12.
Gynecol Oncol ; 157(2): 521-528, 2020 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32145911

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We assessed the feasibility, patient acceptability of and compliance of a new surveillance strategy for ovarian cancer surveillance in women with BRCA mutations, based on assessments of serum CA125 and HE4 every 4 months (Risk of Ovarian Cancer Algorithm (ROCA) arm), compared to Standard of Care (SOC) surveillance with CA125 blood tests and pelvic ultrasounds every 6 months. METHODS: Women were recruited 6/13/16-9/11/17 from an integrated health care system in California for this non-randomized prospective cohort study. Women were invited to participate in a novel serum biomarker surveillance strategy using ROCA or they could opt to be in the standard of care control arm with ultrasound and CA 125 every 6 months. Outcomes assessed included compliance, self-reported distress using the Impact of Event Scale (IES) and cancer anxiety using the Cancer Worry Scale. RESULTS: There were 159 women in the ROCA arm and 43 in the SOC arm. Overall, compliance was higher in the ROCA arm (83.2%) than in SOC (51.9%), p < 0.0001. Based on the IES, ROCA arm women reported less feelings about intrusion and avoidance at 12 months compared to baseline; the difference approached significance for intrusion (7.6% vs 4.1% severe, p = 0.057) and was statistically significant for avoidance (20.8% vs 9.9% severe, p = 0.034). CONCLUSIONS: This pilot demonstrated that compliance was high with blood tests performed every four months for ovarian cancer surveillance. Moreover, ROCA women had lower stress scores over time than SOC women. Given the lack of clinical utility and poor compliance shown with traditional ultrasound and CA125 tests, further investigation is warranted of longitudinal biomarker surveillance for early detection of ovarian cancer.


Asunto(s)
Antígeno Ca-125/sangre , Proteínas de la Membrana/sangre , Neoplasias Ováricas/sangre , Neoplasias Ováricas/diagnóstico por imagen , Proteína 2 de Dominio del Núcleo de Cuatro Disulfuros WAP/metabolismo , Adulto , Algoritmos , Biomarcadores de Tumor/sangre , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Cooperación del Paciente , Proyectos Piloto , Riesgo , Ultrasonografía , Espera Vigilante/métodos
13.
J Nerv Ment Dis ; 203(4): 243-51, 2015 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25816046

RESUMEN

We examine the efficacy of conventional cognitive behavioral therapy (CCBT) versus religiously integrated CBT (RCBT) in persons with major depression and chronic medical illness. Participants were randomized to either CCBT (n = 67) or RCBT (n = 65). The intervention in both groups consisted of ten 50-minute sessions delivered remotely during 12 weeks (94% by telephone). Adherence to treatment was similar, except in more religious participants in whom adherence to RCBT was slightly greater (85.7% vs. 65.9%, p = 0.10). The intention-to-treat analysis at 12 weeks indicated no significant difference in outcome between the two groups (B = 0.33; SE, 1.80; p = 0.86). Response rates and remission rates were also similar. Overall religiosity interacted with treatment group (B = -0.10; SE, 0.05; p = 0.048), suggesting that RCBT was slightly more efficacious in the more religious participants. These preliminary findings suggest that CCBT and RCBT are equivalent treatments of major depression in persons with chronic medical illness. Efficacy, as well as adherence, may be affected by client religiosity.


Asunto(s)
Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/métodos , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/terapia , Curación por la Fe/métodos , Religión y Psicología , Adulto , Enfermedad Crónica/epidemiología , Comorbilidad , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/epidemiología , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cooperación del Paciente/psicología , Proyectos Piloto , Teléfono , Resultado del Tratamiento
14.
J Psychosom Res ; 77(2): 135-43, 2014 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25077855

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Religious involvement may help individuals with chronic medical illness cope better with physical disability and other life changes. We examine the relationships between religiosity, depressive symptoms, and positive emotions in persons with major depression and chronic illness. METHODS: 129 persons who were at least somewhat religious/spiritual were recruited into a clinical trial to evaluate the effectiveness of religious vs. secular cognitive behavioral therapy. Reported here are the relationships at baseline between religious involvement and depressive symptoms, purpose in life, optimism, generosity, and gratefulness using standard measures. RESULTS: Although religiosity was unrelated to depressive symptoms (F=0.96, p=0.43) and did not buffer the disability-depression relationship (B=-1.56, SE 2.90, p=0.59), strong relationships were found between religious indicators and greater purpose, optimism, generosity, and gratefulness (F=7.08, p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Although unrelated to depressive symptoms in the setting of major depression and chronic medical illness, higher religious involvement is associated with positive emotions, a finding which may influence the course of depression over time.


Asunto(s)
Adaptación Psicológica , Afecto , Actitud , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual , Trastornos Mentales/psicología , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Religión , Espiritualidad , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedad Crónica , Depresión/psicología , Depresión/terapia , Trastorno Depresivo/psicología , Trastorno Depresivo/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Autoinforme , Apoyo Social , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA