Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Oncologist ; 26(6): 483-491, 2021 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33586274

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommends either three cycles of bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin or four cycles of etoposide and cisplatin (EPx4) as initial chemotherapy for the treatment of good-risk germ cell tumors (GCTs). To assess the response, toxicity, and survival outcomes of EPx4, we analyzed our experience. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Response and survival outcomes, selected toxicities, and adherence to chemotherapy dose and schedule were assessed in patients with good-risk GCT who received EPx4 at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center between 1982 and 2016. The results were compared with our past results and published data. RESULTS: Between 1982 and 2016, 944 patients with GCT were treated with EPx4, 289 who were previously reported plus 655 treated between January 2000 and August 2016. A favorable response was achieved in 928 of 944 patients (98.3%). Five-year progression-free, disease-specific, and overall survival rates were 93.9%, 98.6%, and 97.9%, respectively. Median follow-up was 7.3 years (range, 2.8 months to 35.5 years). Viable, nonteratomatous malignant GCT was present in 3.5% of 432 postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection specimens from patients with nonseminomatous GCT. Febrile neutropenia and thromboembolic events occurred in 16.0% and 8.9%, respectively, with one treatment-related death. In the more recent 655-patient cohort, full-dose EPx4 was administered to 631 (96.3%), with deviations from planned treatment driven mainly by vascular (n = 13), hematologic (n = 11), renal (n = 7), or infectious (n = 5) events. CONCLUSION: EPx4 is highly effective and well tolerated in patients with good-risk GCTs and remains a standard of care. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Four cycles of etoposide and cisplatin (EPx4) is a standard-of-care regimen for all patients with good-risk germ cell tumors with a favorable response rate and disease-specific survival of 98%. Full-dose administration of etoposide and cisplatin and complete resection of residual disease lead to optimal outcomes. EPx4 should be the recommended regimen in active smokers, patients with reduced or borderline kidney function, and patients aged 50 years or older, which are patient groups at increased risk for bleomycin pulmonary toxicity. Because of a risk of acquired severe pulmonary illness, EPx4 may also be favored for patients who vape or use e-cigarettes and during ongoing transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Sistemas Electrónicos de Liberación de Nicotina , Neoplasias de Células Germinales y Embrionarias , Neoplasias Testiculares , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Bleomicina/efectos adversos , Cisplatino/efectos adversos , Etopósido/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias de Células Germinales y Embrionarias/tratamiento farmacológico , SARS-CoV-2 , Neoplasias Testiculares/tratamiento farmacológico
2.
Cancer ; 119(14): 2574-81, 2013 Jul 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23606402

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Germ cell tumors (GCTs) primarily affect adolescent and young adult men. Detailed clinical and treatment characteristics in older men are lacking. METHODS: Patients with GCT seen over a 20-year period at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center were identified. Primary tumor site and histology were compared for patients aged ≥ 50 years at diagnosis versus younger men. For patients aged ≥ 50, individual chart review was performed and treatment delays, changes, and toxicities were recorded for those treated with first-line chemotherapy. RESULTS: Of 4235 diagnoses of GCT, 3999 (94.4%) were made at age < 50 versus 236 (5.6%) at age ≥ 50. Compared with patients diagnosed before age 50, older men more frequently had seminoma (62.7% versus 36.7%) and less frequently, nonseminoma (34.7% versus 63.2%) (P < .0001). Predominant histology switched from nonseminoma to seminoma around age 35. Distribution of primary sites also differed for older versus younger men (testis: 89.4% versus 92.9%; retroperitoneal: 3.8% versus 0.7%; CNS 0% versus 1.7%) except for mediastinal primary tumors, which remained constant across age groups. Fifty patients age ≥ 50 received first-line platinum-based chemotherapy; 30 experienced complications leading to treatment discontinuation, delay ≥ 7 days, or regimen change. Twenty-two (44%) patients experienced neutropenic fever, 6 despite prophylactic growth factor support. Estimated 5-year survival for chemotherapy-treated patients was 84.9%. CONCLUSIONS: Men aged ≥ 50 years comprise less than 10% of GCT diagnoses and have distinct clinical and histological characteristics as compared with younger patients. Although complications from chemotherapy occur frequently in older men, prognosis remains excellent when risk-directed treatment is administered with curative intent.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de Células Germinales y Embrionarias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de Células Germinales y Embrionarias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Testiculares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Testiculares/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Niño , Preescolar , Esquema de Medicación , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Registros Médicos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias de Células Germinales y Embrionarias/epidemiología , Neoplasias de Células Germinales y Embrionarias/secundario , Neutropenia/inducido químicamente , Compuestos de Platino/administración & dosificación , Vigilancia de la Población , Radioterapia Adyuvante , Estudios Retrospectivos , Seminoma/diagnóstico , Seminoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Testiculares/epidemiología , Neoplasias Testiculares/patología , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Semin Oncol ; 30(3): 382-9, 2003 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12870140

RESUMEN

Patients diagnosed with germ cell tumors (GCT) are relatively young, and most are rendered disease-free by primary treatment. Also, second-line therapies in nearly all instances are potentially curative. Therefore, the schedule and modalities of follow-up testing are important issues in detecting recurrence of GCT and for detecting secondary malignancies and complications of therapy. Follow-up is usually based on the pattern and probability of recurrence following primary therapy according to stage and histology. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network has outlined guidelines (www.nccn.org/physician_gls/index.html). There is a paucity of randomized data regarding the follow-up regimens most effective in identifying relapsed disease. Optimal means of imaging and frequency of physician visits and serum marker level measurements need to be further addressed.


Asunto(s)
Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente/normas , Germinoma/diagnóstico , Germinoma/secundario , Tamizaje Masivo/normas , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Primarias Secundarias/diagnóstico , Germinoma/prevención & control , Germinoma/terapia , Humanos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/prevención & control , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Primarias Secundarias/prevención & control , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA