Optimizing targeted drug selection in combination therapy for patients with advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of safety.

OBJECTIVE: For patients with advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), the dose of targeted agents was recommended in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors. We performed a network meta-analysis to describe a categorized safety ranking profile and assess the adaptability of the combination options of targeted agents. METHODS: The targeted agents refer to vascular endothelial growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGF-TKIs) and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors. Randomized controlled trials comparing these drugs were enrolled in a Bayesian model network meta-analysis. RESULTS: Nineteen clinical trials with 11 treatments and 10,615 patients were included. For grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs), compared with placebo, lenvatinib plus everolimus showed worse safety than all other treatments except for lenvatinib (placebo vs. OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.07-0.78). Everolimus was generally the safest agent (OR 1.23, 95% CI 0.50-3.14). Sorafenib arose the least renal AEs (placebo vs. OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.06-11.64), whereas lenvatinib plus everolimus had the highest risk of renal toxicity (placebo vs. 0.17 95% CI 0.01-1.02). For gastrointestinal symptoms, everolimus was related to much lower toxicity than other agents. In the respiratory safety analysis, tivozanib (placebo vs. OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.07-0.31) and axitinib (OR 5.43, 95% CI 3.26-9.22) were the riskiest agents. In terms of hepatobiliary (placebo vs. OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.09-2.10) and hemotoxicity (placebo vs. OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.14-7.68) related AEs, lenvatinib was found to be the safest treatment compared to placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Everolimus, with the best safety of grade ≥ 3, gastrointestinal, and respiratory AEs, was more likely to be considered for combination therapies. Lenvatinib appears to be the safest for blood/lymphatic and hepatobiliary AEs. For patients with renal disorders, sorafenib arises the least renal toxicity AEs. This study will guide treatment options and optimize the trial design for advanced or metastatic RCC.

PD-L1 and VEGFR-2 expression in synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with targeted therapy following cytoreductive nephrectomy.

OBJECTIVES: Few studies have independently investigated the population of patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma (smRCC). In this study, we evaluated programmed death protein-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR-2) expression in primary tumor tissue of smRCC. METHODS: A total of 96 patients with smRCC who were treated with cytoreductive nephrectomy followed by targeted therapy from January 2006 to January 2013 were identified. PD-L1 and VEGFR-2 expression were evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Kaplan-Meier and Cox methods were used for analysis. RESULTS: PD-L1 and VEGFR-2 protein immunopositivity were observed in 39.6% (38 of 96) and 58.3% (56 of 96) of patients, respectively. A significant correlation was detected between VEGFR-2 and PD-L1 expression (P = 0.030). Based on PD-L1 and VEGFR-2 expression, patients with intermediate-risk disease (n = 63) were divided into 4 subgroups including patients who were PD-L1 (+) VEGFR-2 (+) (n = 21), PD-L1 (+) VEGFR-2 (-) (n = 11), PD-L1 (-) VEGFR-2 (+) (n = 15) and PD-L1 (-) VEGFR-2 (-) (n = 16). Compared to the PD-L1 (-) VEGFR-2 (+), PD-L1 (+) VEGFR-2 (+) and PD-L1 (-) VEGFR-2 (-) groups, patients in the PD-L1 (+) VEGFR-2 (-) group had shorter progression-free survival (median, 9.0 vs. 20.0, 16.0 and 15.5 months, P < 0.05) and overall survival (median, 14.0 vs. 33.0, 24.0 and 26.5 months, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Intermediate-risk smRCC patients with PD-L1-positive and VEGFR-2-negative expression who were treated with targeted therapy following cytoreductive nephrectomy had poor prognoses. We suggest that other treatments beyond sunitinib or sorafenib may be explored in this subgroup.

Efficacy of Topical Compound Danxiong Granules for Treatment of Dermatologic Toxicities Induced by Targeted Anticancer Therapy: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

Dermatologic toxicities resulting in dose reduction or discontinuation of treatment pose challenges for targeted anticancer therapies. We conducted this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to investigate the efficacy of topical application of Compound Danxiong Granules (CDG) for treatment of dermatologic toxicities associated with targeted anticancer therapies. One hundred and ten patients with dermatologic toxicities induced by targeted anticancer therapies were randomly assigned to CDG or placebo group. Each crude herb (Rhizoma Chuanxiong, Paeonia suffruticosa Andr., Cortex Phellodendri, Geranium sibiricum L., and Flos Carthami) was prepared as an instant herbal powder. Application of the CDG via topical washes lasted 20 minutes, twice daily, for 10 days. The primary outcome was the total effective rate, defined as reduction in at least one grade of skin toxicity. The total effective rate was 77.61% (52/67) in the CDG group and 27.27% (9/33) in the placebo group (P < 0.0001). Compared to the placebo treatment, CDG treatment achieved a higher total effective rate for hand-foot skin reaction (95.45% versus 27.27%), acneiform eruption (69.23% versus 30.78%), and paronychia (68.42% versus 22.22%). Topical application of CDG can effectively attenuate dermatologic toxicities induced by targeted anticancer therapies. The effect of CDG was more pronounced in hand-foot skin reaction.