RESUMEN
Body weight loss and poor nutritional status are frequently observed after esophageal cancer surgery. The aim of this study was to pilot an investigation on the impact of home enteral tube feeding supplementation (HES) for up to 3 months after esophageal cancer surgery. We retrospectively reviewed consecutive 67 esophageal cancer patients who underwent esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction. We started HES from April 2017. The patients were divided into 2 groups. Among 67 patients, 40 patients underwent HES between April 2017 and November 2020 (HES group). Other 27 patients who underwent esophagectomy between January 2012 and March 2017 were not administered HES (C group). Thereafter, multiple factors concerning patient nutritional status at long-term follow-up were evaluated. The baseline characteristics were balanced between the two groups. There were no significant differences in nutritional status scores before esophagectomy. The percentage weight loss was less in the HES group compared with the C group both at 3 months and 1 year after surgery: 7.3% (-7.6 to 15.2), 7.7% (-4 to 13.9) in the HES group and 10.6% (-3.6 to 29.1), 10.8% (-5.8 to 20.0) in C group (P < 0.05, P < 0.05). In the patients with anastomotic stenosis, the percentage weight loss was less in the HES group compared with the C group: 7.2% (2.0-14.9) and 14.6% (6.2-29.1), P < 0.05. HES may improve early weight loss in postesophagectomy patients.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Esofagectomía , Humanos , Estado Nutricional , Nutrición Enteral , Estudios Retrospectivos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Pérdida de Peso , Suplementos DietéticosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Even if laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has lower invasiveness through small incisions compared with laparotomy, postoperative pain control is important. METHODS: This prospective, randomized, single-blinded, interventional, single-center study was conducted from December 2016 to March 2018 at the Shiga University of Medical Science Hospital in Japan. Enrolled patients were assigned to either a rectus sheath block (RSB) group or an infiltrative local anesthesia (LA) group. After LC, the RSB group received bilateral RSB with 10 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine and the LA group received subcutaneous and fascial injection with 10 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine at the umbilical wound. The primary endpoint was a visual analog scale (VAS) score on postoperative day (POD) 1. RESULTS: This study enrolled 62 patients (RSB group = 31, LA group = 31). On POD1, the mean VAS scores were 36.4 ± 18.9 and 29.4 ± 15.4 in the RSB group and LA groups, respectively, showing that the LA group tended to describe lesser postoperative pain than the RSB group (P = 0.062). CONCLUSIONS: VAS scores on POD1 were not different between the groups. LC patients might obtain postoperative pain control via long-acting local analgesia.
Asunto(s)
Colecistectomía Laparoscópica , Bloqueo Nervioso , Analgésicos , Anestesia Local , Anestésicos Locales , Humanos , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Estudios Prospectivos , Ultrasonografía IntervencionalRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Optimized drug regimens for hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) have not been standardized completely in patients with advanced gastric cancer (GC). We evaluated an optimized anti-tumor protocol comprising 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) combined with cisplatin (CDDP) and mitomycin C (MMC) in vitro for clinical use of HIPEC. METHODS: The sensitivities of 5-FU, CDDP, or MMC, alone or in combination, using different drug concentrations, exposure times, and hyperthermic conditions (42°C) were determined in vitro by the CD-DST method using 3 different differentiated GC cell lines. RESULTS: The tumor cell growth-inhibitory effect of 5-FU was concentration-dependent for all cell lines. In addition, 5-FU showed a hyperthermic sensitization effect at all drug concentrations for all cell lines. The appropriate concentration of each drug was 5-FU, 200 µg/mL; CDDP, 10 µg/mL; MMC, 2 µg/mL. Under hyperthermic conditions, most growth-inhibitory effects for each drug at 30 min was equivalent to 60 min of exposure; use of three drugs combined significantly inhibited growth compared with any of the drugs alone. CONCLUSION: An appropriate in vitro intraperitoneal chemotherapy regimen for GC was combined use of 5-FU, CDDP, and MMC at 42°C for 30 min.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Hipertermia Inducida/métodos , Neoplasias Gástricas/terapia , Procesos de Crecimiento Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Línea Celular Tumoral , Cisplatino/administración & dosificación , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Ensayos de Selección de Medicamentos Antitumorales , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Mitomicina/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We conducted a dose-finding study for 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) administered with cisplatin (CDDP) and mitomycin C (MMC) to find an improved regimen for hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for advanced gastric cancer (GC). METHODS: The appropriate HIPEC regimen previously determined in vitro was 5-FU (200 µg/mL), MMC (2 µg/mL), and CDDP (10 µg/mL) at hyperthermic conditions (42°C) for 30 min. This was a clinical study to determine the recommended dose of 5-FU in combination with MMC and CDDP at 42°C for 30 min and to evaluate HIPEC safety in patients at high risk of developing peritoneal metastases following GC surgery. RESULTS: Twelve patients were treated with surgery plus HIPEC using 5-FU at 0, 500, 750, and 1000 mg combined with MMC (10 mg) and CDDP (50 mg) in the perfusate (5 L). Dose-limiting toxicities did not develop until 1000 mg 5-FU was reached. Four patients experienced grade 1 or 2 adverse events. The recommended dose was 1000 mg 5-FU/5 L perfusate. Eight (66.7%) patients demonstrated no recurrence of peritoneal metastases; 5-year overall survival rate was 83.3%. CONCLUSION: Gastrectomy and HIPEC with MMC, CDDP, and 5-FU is feasible, safe, and may protect against peritoneal metastasis following surgery for advanced GC.
Asunto(s)
Gastrectomía , Hipertermia Inducida/métodos , Neoplasias Gástricas/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Cisplatino/administración & dosificación , Cisplatino/farmacocinética , Terapia Combinada , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Fluorouracilo/farmacocinética , Humanos , Hipertermia Inducida/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mitomicina/administración & dosificación , Mitomicina/farmacocinética , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: We herein report the clinical outcomes of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy(HIPEC)in patients at high risk of colorectal peritoneal metastasis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We enrolled 21 patients with advanced colorectal cancer who were received HIPEC between 2009 and 2014. Retrospectively, we evaluated the short-term and long-term outcomes of these cases. RESULTS: We performed HIPEC for 12 patients with primary cancer and 9 with recurrent cancer. Perioperative complications characteristic of HIPEC did not occur. Seventeen patients(81%)had postoperative recurrence, 5 of whom had a peritoneal recurrence, and all of them already had synchronous peritoneal metastasis at the time of HIPEC. Patients with a higher peritoneal cancer index(PCI)had a tendency towards a higher rate of peritoneal recurrence than those with a lower PCI(11[median]vs 4; p=0.08).
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipertermia Inducida , Neoplasias Peritoneales/prevención & control , Adulto , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Quimioterapia del Cáncer por Perfusión Regional , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Peritoneales/secundario , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Survival of Stage IV gastric cancer is poor. We report 2 cases of Stage IV gastric cancer with positive peritoneal washing cytology or peritoneal dissemination that were successfully treated with gastrectomy and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy( HIPEC)followed by systemic chemotherapy. Case 1: A 59-year-old woman. She was diagnosed with advanced gastric cancer and underwent gastrectomy with HIPEC. Her peritoneal washing cytology was positive during the gastrectomy. After the surgery, she underwent chemotherapy consisting of 8 courses of combination S-1 plus CPT-11 and 19 courses of PTX. It has been 5 years and 7 months since she had the surgery and she survives without recurrence of the cancer. Case 2: A 60-year-old woman. She was diagnosed with advanced gastric cancer and peritoneal dissemination(peritoneal cancer index: 3 points). She underwent gastrectomy, hemi-colectomy, and HIPEC. After the surgery, she underwent chemotherapy, 35 courses of combination S-1 plus PSK/DOC, and 13 courses of S-1 plus PSK. It has been 5 years since her surgery and she survives without exacerbation of the cancer. These cases suggest a gastrectomy and HIPEC followed by systemic chemotherapy may represent an effective treatment for advanced gastric cancer with a small amount of peritoneal metastasis.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Peritoneales/terapia , Peritoneo , Neoplasias Gástricas/terapia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Gastrectomía , Humanos , Hipertermia Inducida , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Peritoneales/secundario , Neoplasias Gástricas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
A 62-year-old woman visited our hospital because of dysphagia. She was diagnosed with upper-middle esophageal type 4 cancer, which was 9 cm in length, according to the results of endoscopy. Squamous cell carcinoma was demonstrated using endoscopic biopsy. A CT scan revealed that the tumor had directly invaded into the trachea(cT4). Chemoradiotherapy(CRT) (5-FU and CDDP with 50 Gy of radiation)was administered. Although CT after CRT resulted in shrinkage of the tumor and no further tracheal invasion, esophageal stenosis remained. Therefore, salvage surgery(subtotal esophagectomy with 3-field lymph node dissection)was performed. Pathologically, no carcinoma cells were found in the resected specimen and a com- plete response(grade 3)was diagnosed. The patient received adjuvant chemotherapy(tegafur/uracil at 300mg/day per os) for 1 year. The patient is alive with no relapse of carcinoma more than 5 years after the first treatment.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Terapia Recuperativa , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Quimioradioterapia , Cisplatino/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Femenino , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis (EPS) is a rare surgical complication that can occur after intraperitoneal treatment. It is also a serious and potentially fatal complication of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. The present report describes a case of surgically treated EPS that probably occurred as a complication of hyperthermic intraperitonal chemotherapy (HIPEC). CASE PRESENTATION: A 39-year-old man required sigmoidectomy for serosal invasive advanced sigmoid colon cancer. HIPEC with oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin C were given as adjuvant therapy. Subsequently, intestinal obstruction developed at 15 months postoperatively, and the patient was hospitalized. Abdominal computed tomography showed a dilated small intestine enveloped by a thickened membrane. We found no evidence of peritoneal recurrence, but exploratory surgery revealed EPS, probably caused by HIPEC. We peeled the capsule off of the intestine. The patient's postoperative course was uneventful, and sufficient nutritional intake after surgery was noted. Seven months after surgery, he is well with no recurrence. CONCLUSION: The surgical treatment via peritonectomy and enterolysis for postoperative EPS appears safe and effective. A diagnosis of EPS should be considered when intestinal obstruction does not show improvement with conservative treatment in patients who have undergone HIPEC, provided the possibility of peritoneal cancer recurrence is excluded.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/métodos , Hipertermia Inducida/efectos adversos , Fibrosis Peritoneal/cirugía , Neoplasias del Colon Sigmoide/terapia , Adulto , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Inyecciones Intraperitoneales , Masculino , Fibrosis Peritoneal/diagnóstico , Fibrosis Peritoneal/etiología , Peritoneo/patología , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XRESUMEN
A case of occult breast cancer with pseudothrombocytopenia (PTCP) is reported. A 50-year-old woman was consulted with a left axillary tumor. Ductal carcinoma was found by the core needle biopsy, and no primary lesion was detected. Her preoperative platelet count, obtained from an ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) sampling bottle, was 3.1 x 10(4) per mL, but she had no history of bleeding problems. A heparinized blood sample showed a normal platelet count of 390 x 10(4) per mL. These findings suggested a diagnosis of occult breast cancer with EDTA-dependent PTCP, and level II axillary lymph node dissection was performed. She received adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy, but she died 2 years and 5 months after the surgery because of lung and brain metastases. Awareness of the phenomenon and knowledge of the underlying physiological principles will enable surgeons to manage patients with EDTA-dependent PTCP appropriately.