Compliance with sentinel lymph node biopsy guidelines for invasive melanomas treated with Mohs micrographic surgery.

BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has not been studied for invasive melanomas treated with Mohs micrographic surgery using frozen-section MART-1 immunohistochemical stains (MMS-IHC). The primary objective of this study was to assess the accuracy and compliance with National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines for SLNB in a cohort of patients who had invasive melanoma treated with MMS-IHC. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included all patients who had primary, invasive, cutaneous melanomas treated with MMS-IHC at a single academic center between March 2006 and April 2018. The primary outcomes were the rates of documenting discussion and performing SLNB in patients who were eligible based on NCCN guidelines. Secondary outcomes were the rate of identifying the sentinel lymph node and the percentage of positive lymph nodes. RESULTS: In total, 667 primary, invasive, cutaneous melanomas (American Joint Committee on Cancer T1a-T4b) were treated with MMS-IHC. The median patient age was 69 years (range, 25-101 years). Ninety-two percent of tumors were located on specialty sites (head and/or neck, hands and/or feet, pretibial leg). Discussion of SLNB was documented for 162 of 176 (92%) SLNB-eligible patients, including 127 of 127 (100%) who had melanomas with a Breslow depth >1 mm. SLNB was performed in 109 of 176 (62%) SLNB-eligible patients, including 102 of 158 melanomas (65%) that met NCCN criteria to discuss and offer SLNB and 7 of 18 melanomas (39%) that met criteria to discuss and consider SLNB. The sentinel lymph node was successfully identified in 98 of 109 patients (90%) and was positive in 6 of those 98 patients (6%). CONCLUSIONS: Combining SLNB and MMS-IHC allows full pathologic staging and confirmation of clear microscopic margins before reconstruction of specialty site invasive melanomas. SLNB can be performed accurately and in compliance with consensus guidelines in patients with melanoma using MMS-IHC.

Evolution of Excisional Surgery Practices for Melanoma in the United States.

IMPORTANCE: National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for melanoma have consistently recommended wide local excision as the standard of care since their inception. Although surgery with more comprehensive margin assessment (eg, Mohs surgery) has been advocated for certain subsets of melanoma, how often these techniques are used in clinical practice is uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To examine trends in the use of comprehensive margin assessment surgery for melanoma by tracking claims data for Mohs surgery. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This national cross-sectional analysis examined claims data from the Optum Clinformatics Data Mart, a nationally representative database. The study cohort consisted of 79 108 patients undergoing surgical excision for melanoma from January 1, 2001, through December 31, 2016. Data were analyzed from January 1, 2001, through December 31, 2016. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was the likelihood of a melanoma being treated with Mohs surgery over time, evaluated by multivariable logistic regression and expressed as the odds of treatment per additional calendar year. RESULTS: Among 79 108 patients with melanoma (median age, 63 years [interquartile range {IQR}, 51-73]; 47 407 men [59.9%]), 75 047 were treated with conventional excision (median age, 62 years [IQR, 50-73 years]; 44 786 men [59.7%]) and 4061 with Mohs surgery (median age, 67 years [IQR, 56-76 years]; 2621 men [64.5%]). Mohs surgery was used in 5.1% of all surgical cases, with the rate of Mohs surgery increasing 304% from 2.6% in 2001 to 7.9% in 2016. Odds of receiving Mohs surgery for melanoma increased significantly in more recent calendar years (odds ratio [OR], 1.02 per calendar year; 95% CI, 1.01-1.03; P < .001). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) use was only coded with Mohs surgery in 1087 cases (26.8%), and the odds of receiving Mohs surgery with IHC increased in more recent calendar years (OR, 1.13 per calendar year; 95% CI, 1.10-1.15; P < .001). Use of Mohs surgery and Mohs surgery with IHC for melanoma differed widely across geographic census divisions with greater than 3-fold variation between the regions with highest and lowest use in every period (eg, for 2013 through 2016, the East South Central region used Mohs surgery in 8.8% of melanoma excisions compared with 2.6 in the New England region). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Despite stable guidelines for melanoma surgery, the results of this study suggest that surgical practices for melanoma are evolving. Wide variations in surgical practice patterns for melanoma are present in the United States. This study's findings suggest that the effect of variations in surgical techniques on outcomes requires scrutiny and further study.

Does treatment of psoriasis reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease?

Psoriasis is an inflammatory disease associated with multiple comorbidities and cardiovascular risk factors. Patients with psoriasis have an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cardiovascular death. It has been proposed that overlapping mechanisms of systemic inflammation contribute to the link between psoriasis and cardiovascular disease. Some psoriasis treatments decrease systemic inflammation, but the effect of psoriasis treatments on heart disease is unknown. In this review of 23 original research publications, we present preliminary evidence that some psoriasis therapies improve cardiovascular biomarkers and the incidence of cardiovascular risk. Phototherapy may reduce some inflammatory cytokines, but there is little evidence for a decreased risk of CVD outcomes. Both methotrexate and tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitors improve cardiovascular inflammatory biomarkers and improve CVD outcomes. Short-term data on interleukin-12/23 inhibitors are varied, but most data suggest there is not an increase in cardiovascular events.

The role of massage in scar management: a literature review.

BACKGROUND: Many surgeons recommend postoperative scar massage to improve aesthetic outcome, although scar massage regimens vary greatly. OBJECTIVE: To review the regimens and efficacy of scar massage. METHODS: PubMed was searched using the following key words: "massage" in combination with "scar," or "linear," "hypertrophic," "keloid," "diasta*," "atrophic." Information on study type, scar type, number of patients, scar location, time to onset of massage therapy, treatment protocol, treatment duration, outcomes measured, and response to treatment was tabulated. RESULTS: Ten publications including 144 patients who received scar massage were examined in this review. Time to treatment onset ranged from after suture removal to longer than 2 years. Treatment protocols ranged from 10 minutes twice daily to 30 minutes twice weekly. Treatment duration varied from one treatment to 6 months. Overall, 65 patients (45.7%) experienced clinical improvement based on Patient Observer Scar Assessment Scale score, Vancouver Scar Scale score, range of motion, pruritus, pain, mood, depression, or anxiety. Of 30 surgical scars treated with massage, 27 (90%) had improved appearance or Patient Observer Scar Assessment Scale score. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence for the use of scar massage is weak, regimens used are varied, and outcomes measured are neither standardized nor reliably objective, although its efficacy appears to be greater in postsurgical scars than traumatic or postburn scars. Although scar massage is anecdotally effective, there is scarce scientific data in the literature to support it.