In vivo and in vitro photoinhibition reactions generate similar degradation fragments of D1 and D2 photosystem-II reaction-centre proteins.

Isolation of photosystem-II reaction centres from pea leaves after photoinhibitory treatment at low temperature (0-1 degrees C) has provided evidence for the mechanism of degradation of the D1 protein in vivo. These isolated reaction centres did not appear to be spectrally distinct from preparations obtained from control leaves that had not been photoinhibited. Breakdown fragments of both the D1 and D2 proteins were, however, found in preparations isolated from photoinhibited leaves, and showed similarities with those detected when isolated reaction centres were exposed to acceptor-side photoinhibition. Analyses of the origin of D1 fragments indicated that the primary cleavage site of this protein was between transmembrane helices IV and V indicative of the acceptor-side mechanism for photoinhibition. The origins of other D1 protein fragments indicate that some donor-side photoinhibition may also have occurred in vivo under the conditions employed. We have shown that the spectral and functional integrating of the isolated photosystem II reaction centre complex is resistant to proteolytic cleavage by trypsin. Use of a more non-specific protease (subtilisin), however, caused significant destabilisation of the special pair of chlorophylls constituting the primary electron donor, P680, with a consequential loss of functional activity. Thus, it is possible that specific cleavage of photosystem-II reaction-centre proteins may occur in vivo following photoinhibitory damage without a significant change in structural integrity, a conclusion supported by the finding that photodamaged and normal reaction centres were isolated together.

Characterisation of photoinduced breakdown of the D1-polypeptide in isolated reaction centres of Photosystem II.

When the isolated reaction centre of Photosystem II, reconstituted with the quinone, 2,5-dibromo-3-methyl-6-isopropyl-p-benzoquinone (DBMIB), is exposed to photoinhibitory illumination, a D1-polypeptide breakdown product of 24 kDa is detected by immunoblotting. In addition, weaker bands are also detected at 17, 13 and 10 kDa. It is suggested that the 24 kDa D1-polypeptide breakdown product is the same as that first observed in vivo by Greenberg et al. (1987) EMBO J. 6, 2865-2869. Its appearance in isolated Photosystem II reaction centres requires the presence of an electron acceptor, but occurs under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions. In our in vitro experimental system the photoinduced degradation of the D1-polypeptide to the 24 kDa fragment was related to the functional activity of the reaction centre and the enzymatic nature of the proteolysis was characterised by a pH optimum of about 8.0 and by inhibition with proteinase inhibitors, especially the serine-type soybean trypsin inhibitor. The results support our earlier findings (Shipton and Barber (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88, 6691-6695) that the appearance of the light-induced D1-polypeptide breakdown pattern of fragments occurs as a consequence of donor side photoinhibition when highly oxidising species accumulate in the reaction centre and bring about pigment oxidation and degradation. We suggest that it is this selective loss of pigments that induces a conformational change in the D1-polypeptide which triggers its autoproteolytic cleavage.

Photoinduced degradation of the D1 polypeptide in isolated reaction centers of photosystem II: evidence for an autoproteolytic process triggered by the oxidizing side of the photosystem.

When the isolated D1/D2/cytochrome b559 complex was exposed to bright light, a distinctive pattern of D1 polypeptide fragments was observed under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions. The major degradation product had an apparent molecular mass of 24 kDa, while other fragments were detected at 17, 14, and 10 kDa by immunoblotting. This pattern was observed when the electron acceptors 2,5-dibromo-3-methyl-6-isopropyl-p-benzoquinone or silicomolybdate were present during illumination. It is known that these conditions stabilize P680+ chlorophyll and bring about the photooxidation and destruction of pigments in the reaction center, particularly chlorophyll absorbing at 670 nm and beta-carotene. When P680+ was not allowed to accumulate, either by omission of an electron acceptor or by addition of both an electron donor (Mn2+) and an acceptor, no breakdown fragments were observed. In the former case, however, some degradation of the D1 and D2 polypeptides did occur. Under conditions that gave rise to the characteristic D1 breakdown pattern, the D2 polypeptide was also degraded to specific fragments detected at about 29 and 21 kDa by immunoblotting. The results indicate that the photoinduced degradation of D1 (and D2) does not involve exogenous proteases but is most likely an autoproteolytic process. Moreover, our data indicate that the photochemical damage giving rise to D1 and D2 degradation occurs on the oxidizing rather than the reducing side of photosystem II and involves photooxidation of the accessory pigments. The results are discussed in terms of D1 and D2 turnover and photoinhibition.