Safety and efficacy of contemporary catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation patients with a history of cardioembolic stroke in the era of direct oral anticoagulants.

BACKGROUND: The safety and efficacy of the contemporary atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation in patients with a recent or previous history of cardioembolic stroke (CS) or transient ischemic attack (TIA) remain to be established. METHODS: A total of 447 patients who underwent first-ever contact force (CF)-guided AF ablation with circumferential pulmonary vein isolation were included. Of these, 17 had CS or TIA within 6 months before ablation (Group 1), 30 more than 6 months before ablation (Group 2), and the other 400 without CS or TIA (Group 3). Procedural complications and recurrence of AF and atrial tachyarrhythmias were compared among the 3 groups. RESULTS: The mean age was 71±7, 66±9, and 61±11 years in Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (p<0.05, Group 1 versus Group 3). The oral anticoagulants were warfarin (n=108, 24.1%), dabigatran (n=101, 22.6%), rivaroxaban (n=147, 32.9%), apixaban (n=87, 19.5%), and edoxaban (n=4, 0.9%), and did not differ among the 3 groups. Median follow-up period was 14 [IQR 12-22], 13 [12-14], and 12 [10-16] months, respectively. One episode of cardiac tamponade, 2 episodes of arteriovenous fistula, and some minor complications occurred in Group 3, but no complications occurred in Groups 1 and 2 in the periprocedural period. Although one episode of CS occurred 11 days after the procedure in Group 3, there were no periprocedural CS, TIA, or major bleedings in Groups 1 and 2. AF recurrence-free rate after the procedure was 76.5%, 86.7%, and 79.1% in Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively, and there was no difference in Kaplan-Meier curves among the 3 groups. CONCLUSION: The safety and efficacy of CF-guided AF ablation in the era of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with a recent or previous history of CS or TIA are similar to those in patients without it.

Long Postpacing Interval After Entrainment of Tachycardia Including a Slow Conduction Zone Within the Circuit.

BACKGROUNDS: Postpacing interval (PPI) measured after entrainment pacing describes the distance between pacing site and reentrant circuit. However, the influential features to PPI remain to be elucidated. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study included 22 cases with slow/fast atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT), 14 orthodromic AV reciprocating tachycardia (AVRT) using an accessary pathway, 22 typical atrial flutter (AFL), and 18 other macroreentrant atrial tachycardia (atypical AFL). Rapid pacing at a pacing cycle length (PCL) 5% shorter than tachycardia cycle length (TCL) was done from a site on or close to the reentry circuit. Pacing sites included the coronary sinus ostium in AVNRT, earliest atrial activation site in AVRT, and cavotricuspid isthmus in typical AFL. In atypical AFL, tachycardia circuit was determined on the basis of CARTO mapping, and then the pacing site was. TCL was significantly longer in AVNRT and AVRT than in typical AFL and atypical AFL (both P < 0.05). PCL minus TCL value was similar among the 4 groups. PPI minus TCL value (milliseconds) was significantly longer in AVNRT (median, 40 [IQR, 29-60.8]) and AVRT (34 [20-47]) than in typical AFL (0 [0-4]) and atypical AFL (3.5 [0-8]) (both P < 0.05). Furthermore, PPI minus TCL was prolonged with shortening of PCL in AVNRT and AVRT (both P < 0.05), whereas it was unchanged in typical AFL (P = 0.50). CONCLUSION: PPI after concealed entrainment is prolonged compared with TCL when the reentry circuit involves a slow conduction zone with a decremental conduction property such as the AV node.