Economic evaluation of a dedicated cardiac resynchronisation therapy preassessment clinic.

INTRODUCTION: Patient evaluation before cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) remains heterogeneous across centres and it is suspected a proportion of patients with unfavourable characteristics proceed to implantation. We developed a unique CRT preassessment clinic (CRT PAC) to act as a final review for patients already considered for CRT. We hypothesised that this clinic would identify some patients unsuitable for CRT through updated investigations and review. The purpose of this analysis was to determine whether the CRT PAC led to savings for the National Health Service (NHS). METHODS: A decision tree model was made to evaluate two clinical pathways; (1) standard of care where all patients initially seen in an outpatient cardiology clinic proceeded directly to CRT and (2) management of patients in CRT PAC. RESULTS: 244 patients were reviewed in the CRT PAC; 184 patients were eligible to proceed directly for implantation and 48 patients did not meet consensus guidelines for CRT so were not implanted. Following CRT, 82.4% of patients had improvement in their clinical composite score and 57.7% had reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume ≥15%. Using the decision tree model, by reviewing patients in the CRT PAC, the total savings for the NHS was £966 880. Taking into consideration the additional cost of the clinic and by applying this model structure throughout the NHS, the potential savings could be as much as £39 million. CONCLUSIONS: CRT PAC appropriately selects patients and leads to substantial savings for the NHS. Adopting this clinic across the NHS has the potential to save £39 million.

Left ventricular activation-recovery interval variability predicts spontaneous ventricular tachyarrhythmia in patients with heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced beat-to-beat variability of repolarization is strongly linked to arrhythmogenesis and is largely due to variation in ventricular action potential duration (APD). Previous studies in humans have relied on QT interval measurements; however, a direct relationship between beat-to-beat variability of APD and arrhythmogenesis in humans has yet to be demonstrated. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the beat-to-beat repolarization dynamics in patients with heart failure at the level of ventricular APD. METHODS: Forty-three patients with heart failure and implanted cardiac resynchronization therapy - defibrillator devices were studied. Activation-recovery intervals as a surrogate for APD were recorded from the left ventricular epicardial lead while pacing from the right ventricular lead to maintain a constant cycle length. RESULTS: During a mean follow-up of 23.6±13.6 months, 11 patients sustained ventricular fibrillation/ventricular tachycardia (VT/VF) and received appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapies (antitachycardia pacing or shock therapy). Activation-recovery interval variability (ARIV) was significantly greater in patients with subsequent VT/VF than in those without VT/VF (3.55±1.3 ms vs 2.77±1.09 ms; P=.047). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis (area under the curve 0.71; P=.046) suggested high- and low-risk ARIV groups for VT/VF. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated that the time until first appropriate therapy for VT/VF was significantly shorter in the high-risk ARIV group (P=.028). ARIV was a predictor for VT/VF in the multivariate Cox model (hazard ratio 1.623; 95% confidence interval 1.1-2.393; P=.015). CONCLUSION: Increased left ventricular ARIV is associated with an increased risk of VT/VF in patients with heart failure.