Initial multicenter experience with a new high-density coloring module: impact for complex atrial arrhythmias interpretation.

BACKGROUND: High-density automated mapping of complex atrial tachycardias (ATs) requires accurate assessment of activation maps. A new local activation display module (HD coloring, Biosense Webster®) provides higher map resolution, a better delineation of potential block reducing color interpolation, and a new propagation display. We evaluated the accuracy of a dedicated local activation display compared with standard algorithm. METHODS: High-density maps from 10 AT were collected with a multipolar catheter and were displayed with standard activation or HD coloring. Six expert operators retrospectively analyzed activation maps and were asked to define (1) the tachycardia mechanism, (2) ablation target, and (3) level of difficulty to interpret those maps. RESULTS: Using HD coloring, operators were able to reach a correct diagnosis in 93% vs. 63%, p < 0.05 compared to standard activation maps. Time to diagnosis was shorter 1.9 ± 1.0 min vs. 3.9 ± 2.1 min, p < 0.05. Confidence level would have allowed ablation without necessity for entrainment maneuvers in 87% vs. 53%, p < 0.05. Operators would have needed to remap or proceed with multiple entrainments in 3% vs. 13% of cases, p < 0.05. Finally, ablation strategy was more accurately identified in 97% vs. 67%, p < 0.05. CONCLUSION: Activation mapping with the new HD coloring module allowed a more accurate, reliable, and faster interpretation of complex ATs mechanisms compared to standard activation maps.

Epicardial electroanatomical mapping, radiofrequency ablation, and lesion imaging in the porcine left ventricle under real-time magnetic resonance imaging guidance-an in vivo feasibility study.

Aims: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the gold standard for defining myocardial substrate in 3D and can be used to guide ventricular tachycardia ablation. We describe the feasibility of using a prototype magnetic resonance-guided electrophysiology (MR-EP) system in a pre-clinical model to perform real-time MRI-guided epicardial mapping, ablation, and lesion imaging with active catheter tracking. Methods and results: Experiments were performed in vivo in pigs (n = 6) using an MR-EP guidance system research prototype (Siemens Healthcare) with an irrigated ablation catheter (Vision-MR, Imricor) and a dedicated electrophysiology recording system (Advantage-MR, Imricor). Following epicardial access, local activation and voltage maps were acquired, and targeted radiofrequency (RF) ablation lesions were delivered. Ablation lesions were visualized in real time during RF delivery using MR-thermometry and dosimetry. Hyper-acute and acute assessment of ablation lesions was also performed using native T1 mapping and late-gadolinium enhancement (LGE), respectively. High-quality epicardial bipolar electrograms were recorded with a signal-to-noise ratio of greater than 10:1 for a signal of 1.5 mV. During epicardial ablation, localized temperature elevation could be visualized with a maximum temperature rise of 35 °C within 2 mm of the catheter tip relative to remote myocardium. Decreased native T1 times were observed (882 ± 107 ms) in the lesion core 3-5 min after lesion delivery and relative location of lesions matched well to LGE. There was a good correlation between ablation lesion site on the iCMR platform and autopsy. Conclusion: The MR-EP system was able to successfully acquire epicardial voltage and activation maps in swine, deliver, and visualize ablation lesions, demonstrating feasibility for intraprocedural guidance and real-time assessment of ablation injury.

The impact of adjunctive complex fractionated atrial electrogram ablation and linear lesions on outcomes in persistent atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis.

AIMS: In persistent atrial fibrillation (PsAF), success rates for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone are limited and additional substrate modification is often performed. The two most widely used substrate-based strategies are the ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE) and left atrial linear ablation (LALA) at the roof and mitral isthmus. However, it is unclear whether adjunctive CFAE ablation or LALA add significant benefit to PVI alone. We performed a meta-analysis to better gauge the benefit of adjunctive CFAE ablation and LALA in PsAF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Electronic databases were systematically searched. We included studies that examined the impact of CFAE ablation or LALA in addition to a PVI-based strategy on clinical outcomes in PsAF. We included both randomized and non-randomized studies. Totally 10 studies (n = 1821) were included: 6 evaluating CFAE ablation, 3 LALA, and 1 both approaches. In comparison with PVI alone, the addition of CFAE ablation [RR 0.86; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.64, 1.16; P = 0.32] or LALA (RR 0.64; 95% CI 0.37, 1.09; P = 0.10) offered no significant improvement in arrhythmia-free survival. However, adjunctive CFAE ablation was associated with significant increases (P < 0.05) and LALA non-significant increases in procedure and fluoroscopy times. CONCLUSION: In PsAF, the addition of CFAE ablation or LALA, in comparison with PVI alone, offers no significant improvement in arrhythmia-free survival. Furthermore, they are associated with increases in both procedural and fluoroscopy times. The optimal ablation strategy for PsAF is currently unclear and needs further refinement.

New diagnostic criteria for identifying left-sided ventricular ectopy using non-contact mapping and virtual unipolar electrogram analysis.

AIMS: To assess the efficacy of non-contact mapping for outflow tract premature ventricular contraction (PVC) and ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation in patients without structural heart disease and a precordial transition at V3 or later and to determine the diagnostic accuracy of new virtual unipolar electrogram criteria for distinguishing left from right-sided foci using a multi-electrode array positioned within the right ventricular outflow tract. METHODS AND RESULTS: Virtual unipolar electrograms at early activation (EA) and break out (BO) sites in 100 patients (36 left-sided foci) who underwent acutely successful outflow tract ablation were analysed and voltage and timing-based criteria measured. The best performing parameters were then re-assessed in 41 patients (14 left-sided) prospectively. Of the candidate criteria for determining a left from right-sided focus, the voltage at 20 ms after EA (EA-V20) and the time from BO to QRS onset (BO-QRS) were the best discriminators with area under the curve (AUC) values based on receiver operator characteristics (ROCs) of 0.947 (0.905-0.989), P < 0.001, and 0.951 (0.907-0.995), P < 0.001, respectively. These two parameters were subsequently assessed prospectively in a further 41 patients (14 left-sided) using the pre-specified cut-off values of -2 mV for EA-V20 and 10 ms for BO-QRS which demonstrated excellent diagnostic accuracy and sufficient inter-beat and inter-observer reproducibility. CONCLUSIONS: This large single-centre experience demonstrates that a strategy for outflow tract PVC/VT ablation using non-contact mapping allows for excellent success rates. Furthermore, detailed analysis of virtual unipolar electrograms allows accurate and reproducible determination of left from right-sided foci that may be used to guide mapping and ablation.

Electrical storm induced by cardiac resynchronization therapy is determined by pacing on epicardial scar and can be successfully managed by catheter ablation.

BACKGROUND: The mechanism of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)-induced proarrhythmia remains unknown. We postulated that pacing from a left ventricular (LV) lead positioned on epicardial scar can facilitate re-entrant ventricular tachycardia. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between CRT-induced proarrhythmia and LV lead location within scar. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-eight epicardial and 63 endocardial maps, obtained from 64 CRT patients undergoing ventricular tachycardia ablation, were analyzed. A positive LV lead/scar relationship, defined as a lead tip positioned on scar/border zone, was determined by overlaying fluoroscopic projections with LV electroanatomical maps. CRT-induced proarrhythmia occurred in 8 patients (12.5%). They all presented early with electrical storm (100% versus 39% of patients with no proarrhythmia; P<0.01), requiring temporary biventricular pacing discontinuation in half of cases. They more frequently presented with heart failure/cardiogenic shock (50% versus 7%; P<0.01), requiring intensive care management. Ventricular tachycardia was re-entrant in all. The LV lead location within epicardial scar was significantly more frequent in the proarrhythmia group (60% versus 9% P=0.03 on epicardial bipolar scar, 80% versus 17% P=0.02 on epicardial unipolar scar, and 80% versus 17% P=0.02 on any-epicardial scar). Ablation was performed within epicardial scar, close to the LV lead, and allowed CRT reactivation in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: CRT-induced proarrhythmia presented early with electrical storm and was associated with an LV lead positioning within epicardial scar. Catheter ablation allowed for resumption of biventricular stimulation in all patients.

The role of pacing in rhythm control and management of atrial fibrillation.

Atrial fibrillation is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia and is increasing in prevalence with an ageing population. As the arrhythmia is often asymptomatic the true prevalence is likely even higher. Largely because of stroke this arrhythmia places a huge financial burden on the health economy. Despite this, large studies assessing rate versus rhythm control have been equivocal. Because of the ineffectiveness of pharmacological therapy much research effort has been undertaken in device and ablative approaches to rhythm management. Although catheter ablation has gained favour because of the high success rates the technique requires considerable expertise and still has a significant complication profile maintaining interest in pacing therapies for atrial fibrillation. Dual chamber versus single-chamber ventricular pacing has been shown to significantly reduce the incidence of atrial fibrillation. Research is currently underway to see if minimising the deleterious effects of right ventricular apical pacing could further increase the benefits of atrioventricular synchronous pacing. Several studies show some (albeit variable) reduction in AF burden with anti-AF algorithms in the setting of bradycardia. Antitachycardia pacing, on the other hand, has not been shown to treat AF in a randomised trial despite the successful termination of co-existent atrial tachycardias. There is increasing evidence that alternative atrial pacing sites may treat AF by improving atrial function. Furthermore, these strategies coupled with other therapies in a 'hybrid approach' have also showed promising results.