Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Anticancer Res ; 44(2): 731-741, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38307555

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/AIM: The aim of this study was to describe and evaluate the patterns, perioperative outcomes, and survival rates of patients subjected to hepatic resections for ovarian-derived liver metastasis as part of cytoreductive surgery with or without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Furthermore, we investigated two subgroups of tumor patterns: hematogenous liver metastasis and infiltrative liver metastatic spread. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted. Patients from a University Tertiary Hepatic and Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Center with primary or recurrent ovarian cancer, who underwent liver resection as part of cytoreductive surgery between January 1992 and December 2022, were included. RESULTS: Data from 35 patients were analyzed. Both median overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were 24.97 months. In a multivariate setting, the combined effect of age, peritoneal carcinomatosis index, body mass index, hematogenous liver metastasis vs. infiltrative spread types, and HIPEC (HR=0.2372; 95%CI=0.0719-0.7823; p=0.0181) over OS was tested. Survival analysis revealed no differences between the two metastatic spread types (OS: p=0.9720; DSS: p=0.9610). Younger age (p=0.0301), splenectomy (p=0.0320), lesser omentectomy (p=0.0178), and right upper quadrant peritonectomy (p=0.0373) were more characteristic for those patients with infiltrative liver metastatic spread. CONCLUSION: Complete cytoreductive surgery, including hepatic resection is a feasible approach with or without additional HIPEC, which may provide survival benefit for patients with advanced and/or recurrent ovarian cancer. If metastatic and infiltrative liver involvement is suspected, liver-specific imaging is recommended.


Asunto(s)
Hipertermia Inducida , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Neoplasias Ováricas , Neoplasias Peritoneales , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias Peritoneales/secundario , Estudios Retrospectivos , Hipertermia Inducida/métodos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/cirugía , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/tratamiento farmacológico , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Tasa de Supervivencia , Terapia Combinada , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico
2.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 16(8): 2188-94, 2009 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19408049

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) including gastric resection combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) can improve the prognosis of selected patients with peritoneal surface malignancies. Perioperative morbidity of this aggressive treatment strategy is high; however, overall mortality can be low in specialized centers. The aim of this study was to assess the safety of gastric resections with anastomosis during CRS and HIPEC. METHODS: Between 2005 and 2008, 204 patients underwent CRS and HIPEC at our tertiary referral centre. Of these, 37 procedures (male/female 24/13, median age 55 years) included gastric resections. The clinical data of all patients were introduced into a database and analyzed with respect to the morbidity associated with the gastric resections. RESULTS: Of all patients included, 16 had pseudomyxoma peritonei, 11 gastric carcinoma, 4 ovarian carcinoma, 3 malignant peritoneal mesothelioma, and 3 colon carcinoma. Twenty-seven patients had previous surgery (n = 22) and/or systemic chemotherapy (n = 18). Fifteen total gastrectomies, 3 subtotal gastrectomies, 12 distal gastrectomies, and 7 gastric wedge resections were performed during CRS. The overall postoperative morbidity was 45%; main surgical complications were pancreatitis (n = 6), abdominal abscess (n = 4), bile leakage (n = 2), and digestive fistula (leakage of ileorectostomy and small bowel perforation) (n = 2). However, no complications occurred at the site of the esophageal anastomosis (n = 15), gastric anastomosis (n = 15) or gastric suture (n = 7). No patient died postoperatively during the hospitalization period. CONCLUSIONS: CRS in combination with HIPEC is associated with high postoperative morbidity; however, anastomosis following total or subtotal gastrectomy is safe in experienced centers. No leakages related to gastric resections occurred in this high-risk patient group.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Gastrectomía , Hipertermia Inducida , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias/cirugía , Neoplasias Peritoneales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Peritoneales/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anastomosis Quirúrgica , Quimioterapia del Cáncer por Perfusión Regional , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias/patología , Neoplasias Peritoneales/secundario , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Pronóstico , Factores de Riesgo , Seguridad , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA