Emergence of resistance to fluconazole as a cause of failure during treatment of histoplasmosis in patients with acquired immunodeficiency disease syndrome.

In sequential clinical trials of treatment for histoplasmosis in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, therapy with fluconazole failed in a higher proportion of patients than did therapy with itraconazole. To determine the cause for failure with fluconazole, antifungal susceptibility testing that used modified National Committee on Clinical Laboratory Standards procedures was performed on all baseline and failure isolates. Failure occurred more frequently in patients with baseline isolates with fluconazole minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) > or =5 microg/mL versus lower MICs; 29% versus 3%, respectively. There was at least a 4-fold increase in fluconazole MIC in the isolates from 10 (59%) of 17 patients for whom paired pretreatment and failure or relapse isolates were available. Cross-resistance to itraconazole was not seen. In conclusion, fluconazole is less active than itraconazole for Histoplasma capsulatum and induces resistance during therapy, which accounted for treatment failure in some patients.

DNA fingerprinting of serial Candida albicans isolates obtained during itraconazole prophylaxis in patients with AIDS.

During a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study testing the efficacy of itraconazole for prophylaxis of systemic and mucosal fungal infections in patients with acquired immune deficiency syndrome, 298 patients were enrolled with 295 evaluable. Of those, 46 patients were considered prophylaxis failures because of recurrent oral or esophageal candidiasis. Oropharyngeal fungal cultures were taken at the time of suspected thrush or Candida esophagitis, but not at baseline. All of the Candida spp. isolates were cultured on CHROMagar Candida medium then identified using API 20 AUX strips. Antifungal susceptibility testing was performed following the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards M-27A guidelines. Sequential isolates were genotyped using randomly amplified polymorphic DNA. Polymerase chain reaction fingerprints were generated using two repetitive sequence primers, (GGA)7 and (GACA)4. The study group consisted of 23 patients, nine from the itraconazole arm and 14 from the placebo arm, who were prophylaxis failures and had more than two C. albicans isolates. Five of 23 had isolates showing a > or =4-fold reduction in susceptibility; four of these patients were in the itraconazole prophylaxis arm and one was in the placebo arm. Three of the five had yeast isolations showing changes in banding patterns over time. Such changes may indicate genetic changes in the same strain that could be linked to acquired resistance to itraconazole, or acquisition of a new strain, or emergence of a previously minor component of the original population.

Amphotericin B combined with itraconazole or fluconazole for treatment of histoplasmosis.

To investigate the efficacy of combined treatment with fluconazole (Flu) and amphotericin B (AmB) for Histoplasma capsulatum meningitis, MICs were determined for 10 clinical isolates, following National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards guidelines. Weak synergy was observed for 6 of the 10 isolates. For the in vivo models, mice either were sham treated or were given Flu (75 mg/kg/day), AmB (2 mg/kg every other day), itraconazole (Itra; 75 mg/kg/day), AmB+Flu, or AmB+Itra. Following infection with 5x105 yeasts, Flu antagonized AmB's reduction of fungal burden without reducing its effect on survival. When in vivo antagonism was reproduced following infection with 1x104 yeasts, a higher fungal burden was observed in the lungs. Itra had no effect on AmB's activity and was more effective than Flu for clearance of fungal burden. These findings caution against use of AmB+Flu for treatment of histoplasmosis, but studies of the effect of treatment on the fungal burden in the brain are needed to assess combination therapy for meningitis.

Comparison of the echinocandin caspofungin with amphotericin B for treatment of histoplasmosis following pulmonary challenge in a murine model.

Twenty clinical isolates of Histoplasma capsulatum were tested for their in vitro susceptibilities to caspofungin in comparison to those to amphotericin B by following National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards guidelines for yeasts. The mean MICs were 16.6 microgram/ml (range, 8 to 32 microgram/ml) for caspofungin and 0.56 microgram/ml (range, 0.5 to 1.0 microgram/ml) for amphotericin B. Survival experiments used a 10(5) dose in a pulmonary challenge model with B6C3F(1) mice. All mice that received amphotericin B at 2 mg/kg of body weight every other day (q.o.d.), 30% of mice that received caspofungin at 8 mg/kg/day, and 20% of mice that received caspofungin at 4 mg/kg/day survived to day 15, while mice that received caspofungin at 2 mg/kg/day and all control mice that received the vehicle died by day 14. Amphotericin B at 2 mg/kg q.o.d. markedly reduced the fungal burden in the lungs and spleens, as measured by Histoplasma antigen detection techniques and quantitative cultures, for each comparison. Caspofungin at 10 mg/kg twice a day (b.i.d.) did not reduce the fungal burden, as measured by antigen detection techniques, but slightly reduced the levels of fungi in both the lungs and spleens, as determined by quantitative cultures. Caspofungin at 5 mg/kg b.i.d. did not affect fungal burden. Overall, caspofungin had only a slight effect on survival or fungal burden.

Comparison of a new triazole antifungal agent, Schering 56592, with itraconazole and amphotericin B for treatment of histoplasmosis in immunocompetent mice.

A murine model of intratracheally induced histoplasmosis was used to evaluate a new triazole antifungal agent, Schering (SCH) 56592, for treatment of histoplasmosis. MICs were determined for SCH 56592, amphotericin B, and itraconazole by testing yeast-phase isolates from 20 patients by a macrobroth dilution method. The MICs at which 90% of the isolates are inhibited were for 0.019 microgram/ml for SCH 56592, 0.5 microgram/ml for amphotericin B, and < or = 0.019 microgram/ml for itraconazole. Survival studies were done on groups of 10 B6C3F1 mice with a lethal inoculum of 10(5). All mice receiving 5, 1, or 0.25 mg of SCH 56592 per kg of body weight per day, 2.5 mg of amphotericin B per kg every other day (qod), or 75 mg of itraconazole per kg per day survived to day 29. Only 44% of mice receiving 5 mg of itraconazole/kg/day survived to day 29. Fungal burden studies done in similar groups of mice with a sublethal inoculum of 10(4) showed a reduction in CFUs and Histoplasma antigen levels in lung and spleen tissue in animals treated with 2 mg of amphotericin B/kg qod, 1 mg of SCH 56592/kg/day, and 75 mg of itraconazole/kg/day, but not in those treated with lower doses of the study drugs (0.2 mg of amphotericin B/kg qod, 0.1 mg of SCH 56592/kg/day, or 10 mg of itraconazole/kg/day). Serum drug concentrations were measured 3 and 24 h after the last dose in mice (groups of five to seven mice), each treated for 7 days with SCH 56592 (10 and 1 mg/kg/day) and itraconazole (75 and 10 mg/kg/day). Mean levels measured by bioassay were as follows: SCH 56592, 10 mg/kg/day (2.15 micrograms/ml at 3 h and 0.35 microgram/ml at 24 h); SCH 56592, 1 mg/kg/day (0.54 microgram/ml at 3 h and none detected at 24 h); itraconazole, 75 mg/kg/day (22.53 micrograms/ml at 3 h and none detected at 24 h); itraconazole, 10 mg/kg/day (1.33 micrograms/ml at 3 h and none detected at 24 h). Confirmatory results were obtained by high-pressure liquid chromatography assay. These studies show SCH 56592 to be a promising candidate for studies of treatment of histoplasmosis in humans.