Complementary effectiveness of carotid sinus massage and tilt testing for the diagnosis of reflex syncope in patients older than 40 years: a cohort study.

AIMS: Indications, methodology, and diagnostic criteria for carotid sinus massage (CSM) and tilt testing (TT) have been standardized by the 2018 Guidelines on Syncope of the European Society of Cardiology. Aim of this study was to assess their effectiveness in a large cohort which reflects the performance under 'real-world' conditions. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analysed all patients who had undergone CSM and TT in the years 2003-2019 for suspected reflex syncope. Carotid sinus massage was performed according to the 'Method of Symptoms'. Tilt testing was performed according to the 'Italian protocol' which consists of a passive phase followed by a sublingual nitroglycerine phase. For both tests, positive test was defined as reproduction of spontaneous symptoms in the presence of bradycardia and/or hypotension. Among 3293 patients (mean age 73 ± 12 years, 48% males), 2019 (61%) had at least one test positive. A bradycardic phenotype was found in 420 patients (13%); of these, 60% were identified by CSM, 37% by TT, and 3% had both test positive. A hypotensive phenotype was found in 1733 patients (53%); of these, 98% were identified by TT and 2% had both TT and CSM positive. CONCLUSION: The overall diagnostic yield of the tests in patients >40-year-old with suspected reflex syncope was 61%. Both CSM and TT are useful for identifying those patients with a bradycardic phenotype, whereas CSM has a limited value for identifying the hypotensive phenotype. Since the overlap of responses between tests is minimal, both CSM and TT should be performed in every patient over 40 years receiving investigation for unexplained but possible reflex syncope.

Assessment of the vasodepressor reflex in carotid sinus syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Assessment of the vasodepressor reflex in carotid sinus syndrome is influenced by the method of execution of the carotid sinus massage and the coexistence of the cardioinhibitory reflex. METHODS AND RESULTS: Carotid sinus massage reproduced spontaneous symptoms in 164 patients in the presence of hypotension or bradycardia (method of symptoms). When an asystolic pause was induced, the vasodepressor reflex was reassessed after suppression of the asystolic reflex by means of 0.02 mg/kg IV atropine. An isolated vasodepressor form was found in 32 (20%) patients, who had lowest systolic blood pressure (SBP) of 65±15 mm Hg. Of these, only 21 (66%) patients had an SBP fall ≥50 mm Hg, which is the universally accepted cut-off value for the diagnosis of the vasodepressor form. Conversely, a lowest SBP value of ≤85 mm Hg (corresponding to the fifth percentile) detected 97% of vasodepressor patients, but was also present in 84% of the 132 patients with an asystolic reflex. These latter patients had both asystole ≥3 s (mean 7.6±2.2 s) and SBP fall to 63±22 mm Hg: in 46 (28%) patients, symptoms persisted after atropine (mixed form), in the remaining 86 (52%) patients, symptoms did not (cardioinhibitory form) persist. CONCLUSIONS: The current definition of ≥50 mm Hg SBP fall failed to identify one third of patients with isolated vasodepressor form. A cut-off value of symptomatic SBP of ≤85 mm Hg seems more appropriate, but it is unable to identify cardioinhibitory forms. In asystolic forms, atropine testing is able to distinguish a cardioinhibitory form from a mixed form.