The anti-viral effect of sorafenib in hepatitis C-related hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Sorafenib is currently the only approved systemic therapy shown to have efficacy in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Recent studies suggest that hepatitis C (HCV)-related HCC patients derive more clinical benefit from sorafenib than other subgroups, but the mechanism for this effect is unknown. In vitro data suggest that sorafenib may exert anti-viral properties, and thus our aim in this study was to evaluate potential anti-viral activity of sorafenib in patients with HCV-related HCC. AIM: To evaluate potential anti-viral activity of sorafenib in patients with HCV-related HCC. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled patients with HCV-related HCC treated with sorafenib for up to 6 months. Baseline clinical, viral and oncologic data were collected. Patients' HCV viral loads were obtained at various time points, and compared with their baseline viral levels. No patients received any known anti-viral therapy during this time. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients were identified with baseline and subsequent HCV levels available for analysis. Six patients completed 6 months of full dose sorafenib, and comparisons of their HCV viral loads showed no significant change at week 24 (difference of means = 0.3500, CI: -0.1799-0.8799, P = 0.150), or the interim time points. Similarly, the HCV viral loads of all patients who received sorafenib and the viral loads of those patients who had tumour response to sorafenib showed no significant changes at any time point. CONCLUSION: Despite preclinical data and previous subgroup analyses suggesting that sorafenib has an anti-viral effect against HCV, this study suggests that sorafenib lacks significant anti-viral activity in HCV patients with HCC.

The combination of sorafenib with transarterial chemoembolisation for hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Standard of practice involves using transarterial therapy for multifocal hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) alone and sorafenib only for more advanced HCC, but the sorafenib and transarterial therapy combination may provide greater efficacy. AIM: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of concurrent sorafenib and transarterial therapy in HCC. METHODS: Consecutive cases of HCC were treated with sorafenib and transarterial therapy, receiving sorafenib 2 to 4weeks before transarterial therapy. Baseline clinical parameters, adverse events (AEs) and survival were collected. RESULTS: A total of 47 patients received sorafenib and transarterial therapy. The majority of the patients were male (70%) with HCV (60%), median age of 60years, good performance status (0-1), stable cirrhosis (Child: A 72%; B 28%), unresectable tumour (stage: B 81%; C 19%) and median AFP of 24ng/mL. Median follow-up was 12months and median time on sorafenib was 6months. LC Bead TACE was used with a median frequency of 3. The majority of the patients (89%) experienced AEs. The most common AEs were fatigue (51%), hand-foot skin reaction (51%) and diarrhoea (43%). Grade 3 and 4 AEs included fatigue (13%) and hand-foot skin reaction (26%). Most patients required a dose reduction (66%). The main AE related to transarterial therapy was post-TACE syndrome (23%). The disease control rate was 68% at 6months. Overall median survival rate was 18.5months (95% CI 16.1-20.9months). CONCLUSION: Concurrent sorafenib and transarterial therapy is overall safe with no unexpected side effects and encouraging efficacy that warrants further study.

Anti-interleukin-2 receptor therapy in combination with mycophenolate mofetil is associated with more severe hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation.

The pathogenesis of hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence after liver transplantation (LT) is poorly understood, but the cellular immune response is likely to have a major role. Daclizumab, an interleukin-2 receptor (IL-2R) antibody that blunts T-cell activation, leading to a decreased risk for cellular rejection, is used frequently in transplant recipients. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of daclizumab therapy on the incidence and severity of recurrent HCV. Forty-one liver transplant recipients (21 patients, HCV positive; 20 patients, HCV negative) at high risk for neurological or renal complications of calcineurin inhibitors were administered daclizumab, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and steroids in the early post-LT period, followed by tacrolimus and a steroid taper. All patients were followed up prospectively for graft function and disease recurrence with protocol liver biopsies day 7, month 4, and yearly. Compared with patients without HCV, patients with HCV administered daclizumab had greater 4-month serum alkaline phosphatase, total bilirubin, and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels. These biochemical differences resolved by 12 months, except for persistent elevation of ALT levels. Compared with a well-matched HCV control population, patients with HCV administered daclizumab were more likely to have an earlier onset of hepatitis, jaundice, and greater histological activity. Recurrent hepatitis progressed more rapidly in the daclizumab group; 45% developed advanced disease within 1 year. HCV viral load in the daclizumab group was significantly greater at both 4 months and 1 year. Results of this study suggest that the use of adjuvant IL-2R antibodies in combination with MMF in the early peritransplantation period may be associated with early recurrence of hepatitis C and more rapid histological progression of disease.