Morbidity after secondary cytoreductive surgery with or without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for ovarian cancer: An analysis of a randomized phase II trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess postoperative complications after secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCS) with or without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), we conducted an exploratory analysis of patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer enrolled in a randomized phase II trial. METHODS: Complications occurring within 30 days of surgery were graded using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0; only hemoglobin and platelet levels were assessed. Patients were grouped by CTCAE grade ≥ 3 and < 3 complications. RESULTS: Among 83 eligible patients, 33 (40%) had grade ≥ 3 complications and 50 (60%) had grade < 3 complications; anemia and abdominal infections were the most common. There were no perioperative mortalities. Time to initiation of postoperative chemotherapy for patients with grade ≥ 3 and grade < 3 events was 34 days (range, 18-60) and 31 days (range, 21-43), respectively (P = .017). Median progression-free survival (PFS) did not significantly differ between patients with grade ≥ 3 and grade < 3 complications (11.2 months [95% CI: 9.3-14.4] vs 14.9 months [95% CI: 11.3-16.5], respectively; P = .186), nor did median overall survival (OS) (46.9 months [95% CI: 34-NE] vs 68.2 months [95% CI: 52.1-NE], respectively; P = .053). CONCLUSION: Postoperative complications following SCS with or without HIPEC were associated with slight delays in chemotherapy initiation but did not significantly impact oncologic outcomes.

Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with carboplatin induces distinct transcriptomic changes in ovarian tumor and normal tissues.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with carboplatin on the transcriptomic profiles of normal and ovarian cancer (OC) tissues. METHODS: Normal and tumor samples from four OCs were prospectively collected pre- and immediately post-HIPEC treatment and subjected to RNA-sequencing. Differential gene expression, gene ontology enrichment and pathway analyses were performed. Heat shock protein and immune-response protein expression was assessed using protein arrays and western blotting. RESULTS: RNA-sequencing revealed 4231 and 322 genes significantly differentially expressed between pre- and post-treatment normal and OC tissues, respectively (both adjusted p-value <0.05). Gene enrichment analyses demonstrated that the most significantly upregulated genes in normal tissues played a role in immune as well as heat shock response (both adjusted p < 0.001). In contrast, HIPEC induced an increased expression of primarily heat shock response and protein folding-related genes in tumor tissues (both adjusted p < 0.001). HIPEC-induced heat shock protein (HSP) expression changes, including in HSP90, HSP40, HSP60, and HSP70, were also observed at the protein level in both normal and tumor tissues. CONCLUSIONS: HIPEC with carboplatin resulted in an upregulation of heat shock-related genes in both normal and tumor tissue, with an additional immune response gene induction in normal and protein folding in tumor tissue. The findings of our exploratory study provide evidence to suggest that HIPEC administration may suffice to induce gene expression changes in residual tumor cells and raises a biological basis for the consideration of combinatorial treatments with HSP inhibitors.

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy after interval debulking surgery for advanced-stage ovarian cancer: Feasibility and outcomes at a comprehensive cancer center.

OBJECTIVES: Intraperitoneal (IP)-based chemotherapy following primary debulking surgery (PDS), although associated with substantial toxicity, is supported by a strong evidence base. We sought to determine feasibility and outcomes of IP chemotherapy after interval debulking surgery (IDS) among patients deemed ineligible for PDS. METHODS: We identified all patients with high-grade, stage III/IV ovarian cancer treated at our institution with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by IDS and postoperative chemotherapy from 1/2008-5/2013. IP and intravenous (IV) regimens were defined; demographic and clinical data were analyzed using appropriate statistics. RESULTS: Of 128 evaluable patients, 118 (92%) achieved ≤1cm residual disease at IDS and 74 (58%) achieved a complete gross resection (CGR). An IP port was placed in 54/128 patients (42%), with 89% port utilization. Forty-eight (38%) of 128 patients received IP chemotherapy, 17 (13%) weekly IV paclitaxel/q3week carboplatin, and 63 (49%) q3week IV carboplatin/paclitaxel. Patients completed a median of 3 IP cycles (range, 2-6), with 3 (5.5%) of 54 ports removed due to complications. Overall survival (OS) for patients with a CGR treated with IP and weekly IV chemotherapy was 53.2months (range, 24.7-NE), and 44.2months (range, 30.2-NE) with any visible residual disease (p<0.001). Median OS was 53.2months (range, 44.5-NE) for IP-, not reached for weekly IV-, and 34.2months (range, 27.5-49.8) for q3week IV-treated patients (p=0.1). CONCLUSIONS: Patients administered IP after IDS had a high rate of successful port utilization, with few regimen switches. Oncologic outcomes were optimal in patients with a CGR at IDS, regardless of chemotherapy used.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and primary debulking surgery utilization for advanced-stage ovarian cancer at a comprehensive cancer center.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and primary debulking surgery (PDS) before and after results from a randomized trial were published and showed non-inferiority between NACT and PDS in the management of advanced-stage ovarian carcinoma. METHODS: We evaluated consecutive patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer treated at our institution from 1/1/08-5/1/13, which encompassed 32 months before and 32 months after the randomized trial results were published. We included all newly diagnosed patients with high-grade histology and stage III/IV disease. Associations between the use of NACT and clinical variables over time were evaluated. RESULTS: Our study included 586 patients. Median age was 62 years (range, 30-90); 406 patients (69%) had stage III disease, and 570 (97%) had disease of serous histology. Twenty-six percent (154/586) were treated with NACT and 74% (432/586) with PDS. NACT use increased significantly from 22% (56/256) before 2010 (at which point the results of the randomized trial were published) to 30% (98/330) after 2010 (p=0.037). Although patients who underwent PDS were more likely to experience grade 3/4 surgical complications than those who underwent NACT, those selected for PDS had a median OS of 71.7 months (CI, 59.8-not reached) compared with 42.9 months (CI 37.1-56.3) for those selected for NACT. CONCLUSIONS: In this single-institution analysis, the best survival outcomes were observed in patients who were deemed eligible for PDS followed by platinum-based chemotherapy. Selection criteria for NACT require further definition and should take institutional surgical strategy into account.

Is It Time to Centralize Ovarian Cancer Care in the United States?

PURPOSE: The purpose of this article was to broadly review the most up-to-date information pertaining to the centralization of ovarian cancer care in the United States (US) and worldwide. METHODS: Much of the present literature pertaining to disparities in, and centralization of, ovarian cancer care in the US and internationally was reviewed, and specifically included original research and review articles. RESULTS: Data show improved optimal debulking rates, National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline adherence, and overall survival rates in higher-volume, more specialized hospitals, and amongst higher-volume providers. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer, especially those with higher stages (III and IV), are better served by centralized care in high-volume hospitals and by high-volume physicians, who adhere to NCCN guidelines wherever possible. More research is needed to determine the policy changes that can increase NCCN guideline adherence in low-volume hospitals and low-provider caseload scenarios. Policy and future research should be aimed at increasing patient access, either directly or indirectly, to high-volume hospital and high-volume providers, especially amongst Medicare, lower socioeconomic status, and minority patients.

Twelve-year experience in the management of endometrial cancer: a change in surgical and postoperative radiation approaches.

OBJECTIVE: Over the past 12 years, the primary management of endometrial cancer at a comprehensive cancer center has undergone changes characterized by the increased use of laparoscopic surgery with comprehensive staging resulting in a decreased reliance on postoperative adjuvant whole pelvic radiation therapy (WPRT). The purpose of this study was to analyze the results of these changes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1/93 and 12/04, 1312 patients underwent surgery for endometrial cancer consisting of either abdominal or laparoscopic hysterectomy/bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (TAH/BSO or LAVH/BSO). Pelvic and para-aortic lymph node dissection was performed at the discretion of the attending physician. Postoperative adjuvant treatment employed in patients with high-risk features consisted mainly of WPRT+/-intravaginal radiation therapy (IVRT). Total direct medical charges incurred from 10 days prior to surgery through 75 days after surgery were determined with charges converted to direct medical costs, taking into account inflationary changes. RESULTS: The median age at diagnosis for all patients was 62 years (range, 21-93 years), with a median follow-up of 31.6 months (range, 0-140 months). There was a significant increase in LAVH/BSO versus TAH/BSO (P<0.001) until 2001 when we began participating in a national randomized trial of laparoscopic versus abdominal surgery. In addition, there was a significant increase in the percentage of patients undergoing lymph node dissection as well as the median number of nodes removed (P<0.001). This was associated with a significant decrease in the use of WPRT during 1993-1998 versus 1999-2004 (P<0.001). The use of IVRT remained the same during these time periods. There was no significant difference in 1-, 2-, or 5-year survival for patients treated in either time period. Cost data were available from 1995 to 2004. There was a significant increase in the median total direct medical costs when comparing periods 1995-1998 with 1999-2004 (P<0.001), although the median cost of pelvic radiation therapy was lower in the later time period. CONCLUSION: Over a 12-year period, the primary management of endometrial cancer changed to include an increased use of laparoscopy and comprehensive surgical staging and a decrease in the use of postoperative adjuvant WPRT, with no appreciable negative effect on overall survival.