Phase I Study of Lenalidomide and Sorafenib in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

LESSONS LEARNED: Combination therapies in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma can be associated with overlapping toxicity and are therefore poorly tolerated.Using sorafenib at the maximum tolerated dose can lead to a higher incidence of toxicities. Consequently, combination studies might evaluate sorafenib at alternative schedules or doses to improve tolerance, recognizing this could affect sorafenib efficacy.Although this combination was poorly tolerated, it does not exclude further evaluation of new-generation immunomodulator drugs or immune checkpoint inhibitors in the hope of optimizing tolerance and safety. BACKGROUND: Sorafenib is the standard treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and to date, no combination therapy has demonstrated superior survival compared with sorafenib alone. The immunosuppressive microenvironment in HCC is a negative predictor for survival. Lenalidomide is an immunomodulator and antiangiogenic agent, with limited single-agent efficacy in HCC. Based on these data, we designed a phase I study of sorafenib plus lenalidomide to determine the safety and preliminary antitumor activity of this combination. METHODS: This was an open-label, phase I study with a 3+3 dose escalation/de-escalation design. The starting dose of sorafenib was 400 mg p.o. b.i.d. and of lenalidomide was 15 mg p.o. daily with a planned dose escalation by 5 mg per cohort up to 25 mg daily. Dose de-escalation was planned to a sorafenib dose of 400 mg p.o. daily combined with two doses of lenalidomide: 10 mg p.o. daily for a 28-day cycle (cohort 1) and 10 mg p.o. daily for a 21- or 28-day cycle (cohort 2). Patients with cirrhosis, a Child-Pugh score of A-B7, and no previous systemic therapy were eligible. RESULTS: Five patients were enrolled. Their median age was 56 years (range 39-61), and the ECOG status was 0-2. Four patients were treated at dose level (DL) 1. Because of the poor tolerance to the combination associated with grade 2 toxicities, one more patient was treated at DL -1. No dose-limiting toxicity was observed as specified per protocol. The most common toxicities were nausea, anorexia, pruritus, elevated liver enzymes, and elevated bilirubin. Three patients experienced one or more of the following grade 3 toxicities: fatigue (DL 1), increased bilirubin (DL 1), skin desquamation (DL -1), and elevated transaminase levels (DL 1). The median duration of therapy was 1 cycle (range 1-3). All patients discontinued the study, 4 because of progressive disease and 1 by patient preference. The best confirmed response was progressive disease. The median progression-free survival was 1.0 month (95% confidence interval 0.9-2.8), and the median overall survival was 5.9 months (95% confidence interval 3.68-23.4). CONCLUSION: In our small study, the combination of lenalidomide and sorafenib was poorly tolerated and showed no clinical activity. Although the study was closed early because of toxicity concerns, future studies assessing combinations of sorafenib with new-generation immunomodulator drugs or other immunomodulatory agents, should consider lower starting doses of sorafenib to avoid excessive toxicity.

Phase 1 pharmacogenetic and pharmacodynamic study of sorafenib with concurrent radiation therapy and gemcitabine in locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer.

PURPOSE: To define the safety, efficacy, and pharmacogenetic and pharmacodynamic effects of sorafenib with gemcitabine-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in locally advanced pancreatic cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients received gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) intravenously weekly × 3 every 4 weeks per cycle for 1 cycle before CRT and continued for up to 4 cycles after CRT. Weekly gemcitabine 600 mg/m(2) intravenously was given during concurrent intensity modulated radiation therapy of 50 Gy to gross tumor volume in 25 fractions. Sorafenib was dosed orally 400 mg twice daily until progression, except during CRT when it was escalated from 200 mg to 400 mg daily, and 400 mg twice daily. The maximum tolerated dose cohort was expanded to 15 patients. Correlative studies included dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and angiogenesis genes polymorphisms (VEGF-A and VEGF-R2 single nucleotide polymorphisms). RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were enrolled. No dose-limiting toxicity occurred during induction gemcitabine/sorafenib followed by concurrent CRT. The most common grade 3/4 toxicities were fatigue, hematologic, and gastrointestinal. The maximum tolerated dose was sorafenib 400 mg twice daily. The median progression-free survival and overall survival for 25 evaluable patients were 10.6 and 12.6 months, respectively. The median overall survival for patients with VEGF-A -2578 AA, -1498 CC, and -1154 AA versus alternate genotypes was 21.6 versus 14.7 months. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI demonstrated higher baseline K(trans) in responding patients. CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent sorafenib with CRT had modest clinical activity with increased gastrointestinal toxicity in localized unresectable pancreatic cancer. Select VEGF-A/VEGF-R2 genotypes were associated with favorable survival.

Effect of preoperative fever-range whole-body hyperthermia on immunological markers in patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have demonstrated beneficial immunological effects of fever-range whole-body hyperthermia (FR-WBH) as an adjunct to non-surgical cancer therapy. We conducted a study of preoperative FR-WBH in patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery to evaluate perioperative, hyperthermia-induced immunomodulation. METHODS: The trial was conducted as a subject-blinded, controlled, randomized study. Subjects in the FR-WBH group (n=9) were treated with FR-WBH before operation under propofol sedation; the target core temperature was 39 (0.5)°C with 1 h warming and 2 h plateau phase. Subjects in the control group (n=9) were treated with propofol sedation only. Blood samples were acquired before and after treatment, after operation, and 24, 48 h, and 5 days after the end of surgery. The following parameters were measured: lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α, procalcitonin (PCT), interleukin (IL)-6/10, heat shock proteins (HSPs) 60, 70, and 90, human leucocyte antigen-DR (HLA-DR), and LPS-binding protein (LBP). RESULTS: HSPs were increased in the FR-WBH group after treatment [HSP60, 48 h postop: 143 (41)% vs 89 (42)%, P=0.04; HSP90, postop: 111 (33)% vs 64 (31)%, P=0.04; HSP70: P=0.40; FR-WBH vs control, P-values for area under the level/time curve]. TNF-α levels were elevated after surgery in the control group and remained near baseline in the FR-WBH group [24 h postop: 73 (68)% vs 151 (72)%, P=0.04]. PCT increased in both groups 24 h after surgery; in the control group, this increase was significantly higher (P=0.02). There were no significant differences for IL, HLA-DR, or LBP. CONCLUSIONS: The immune system to react to surgical stress, as measured by a panel of laboratory indicators, might be improved by preoperative FR-WBH.

The role of Foxp3+ T cells in long-term efficacy of prophylactic and therapeutic mucosal tolerance induction in mice.

BACKGROUND: Mucosal tolerance induction is suggested as treatment strategy for allergic diseases. Using a murine model of birch pollen (BP) allergy we investigated the long-term efficacy and the underlying mechanisms of mucosal tolerance induction with two structurally different molecules in a prophylactic and in a therapeutic set-up. METHODS: The three-dimensional major BP allergen Bet v 1 or a nonconformational hypoallergenic fragment thereof was intranasally applied before (prophylaxis) or after sensitization (therapy). RESULTS: In the prophylactic application both the Bet v 1 allergen and the fragment prevented allergic sensitization, and this effect lasted for 1 year. In the therapeutic approach established allergic immune responses were also suppressed after treatment with either of the molecules. However, a long-lasting curative effect (6 months) was only achieved with the Bet v 1 allergen but not with the Bet v 1 fragment. Real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis of splenocytes revealed that tolerance induction with the Bet v 1 allergen was associated with enhanced expression of transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta, interleukin (IL)-10, and Foxp3 mRNA in CD4+ T cells, whereas treatment with the fragment led to the induction of either Foxp3 (prophylaxis) or IL-10 (therapy) alone. CONCLUSION: From these data we concluded (i) that the mechanisms underlying peripheral tolerance are linked to the conformation of the antigen, (ii) that mucosal tolerance is mediated by separate regulatory cell subsets, and (iii) that the long-term efficacy of immunosuppression is associated with the presence of Foxp3+ T cells.

Administration of proteolytic enzymes bromelain and trypsin diminish the number of CD4+ cells and the interferon-gamma response in Peyer's patches and spleen in endotoxemic balb/c mice.

Recent publications revealed that bromelain exerts a marked effect on T-cell response by inhibiting T-cell signal transduction. These experimental studies may help to explain former clinical investigations showing that Phlogenzym (PHL), a preparation consisting of the proteases bromelain and trypsin and the antioxidant rutosid, ameliorate certain diseases with an underlying inflammatory process. In this study, we showed that orally administered PHL significantly reduced lymphocyte subpopulations in Peyer's patches (PPs) of healthy and endotoxemic mice. Similarly, the number of splenic lymphocytes in endotoxin-boostered mice was significantly lowered by PHL. The effect of PHL was more pronounced on T cells than on B cells leading especially to a diminution of CD4+ cells. Moreover, PHL pretreatment decreased IFN-gamma mRNA in PPs and spleen of endotoxemic mice. These results reveal that PHL may ameliorate inflammatory process by reducing the number of CD4+ cells and by diminishing INF-gamma mRNA levels.

Influence of enteral diets supplemented with key nutrients on lymphocyte subpopulations in Peyer's patches of endotoxin-boostered mice.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: This study was undertaken to compare the effect of different key nutrients on lymphocyte subsets of Peyer's patches (PP) and spleen in endotoxemic mice. METHODS: Female Balb/c mice were fed over a period of 10 days either with an isocaloric and isonitrogenous control diet (Control), a glutamine enriched diet (Diet I) or a diet containing glutamine, arginine, glycine, and n-3 fatty acids (Diet II). On day 7 the mice were challenged intraperitoneally with 25 microg LPS. The lymphocyte subpopulations (B cells, T cells, CD4+ and CD8+) of PP and spleen were analysed by flow cytometry. Glutathione content of small intestinal mucosa and spleen was determined by HPLC and luminal small intestinal IgA by ELISA. RESULTS: Both experimental diets increased the number of B and T cells in the PP and that of T cells in the spleen (P<0.01). Glutathione content in PP and spleen was higher under administration of key nutrients (P<0.05). Diet II reduced luminal small intestinal IgA content in comparison to the two other groups. CONCLUSION: The addition of arginine, glycine and n-3 fatty acids to a glutamine supplemented diet does not enhance lymphocyte numbers in PP and spleen, but reduces intestinal IgA content.

[Glutamine: effects on the immune system, protein balance and intestinal functions]. / Glutamin: Wirkungen auf das Immunsystem, auf Eiweisshaushalt und Darmfunktionen.

Glutamine is the most abundant free amino acid of the human body. In catabolic stress situations such as after operations, trauma and during sepsis the enhanced transport of glutamine to splanchnic organs and to blood cells results in an intracellular depletion of glutamine in skeletal muscle. Glutamine is an important metabolic substrate for cells cultivated under in vitro conditions and is a precursor for purines, pyrimidines and phospholipids. Increasing evidence suggests that glutamine is a crucial substrate for immunocompetent cells. Glutamine depletion in the cultivation medium decreases the mitogen-inducible proliferation of lymphocytes, possibly by arresting the cells in the G0-G1 phase of the cell cycle. Glutamine depletion in lymphocytes prevents the formation of signals necessary for late activation. In monocytes glutamine deprivation downregulates surface antigens responsible for antigen preservation and phagocytosis. Glutamine is a precursor for the synthesis of glutathionine and stimulates the formation of heat-shock proteins. Moreover, there are suggestions that glutamine plays a crucial role in osmotic regulation of cell volume and causes phosphorylation of proteins, both of which may stimulate intracellular protein synthesis. Experimental studies revealed that glutamine deficiency causes a necrotising enterocolitis and increases the mortality of animals subjected to bacterial stress. First clinical studies have demonstrated a decrease in the incidence of infections and a shortening of the hospital stay in patients after bone marrow transplantation by supplementation with glutamine. In critically ill patients parenteral glutamine reduced nitrogen loss and caused a reduction of the mortality rate. In surgical patients glutamine evoked an improvement of several immunological parameters. Moreover, glutamine exerted a trophic effect on the intestinal mucosa, decreased the intestinal permeability and thus may prevent the translocation of bacteria. In conclusion, glutamine is an important metabolic substrate of rapidly proliferating cells, influences the cellular hydration state and has multiple effects on the immune system, on intestinal function and on protein metabolism. In several disease states glutamine may consequently, become an indispensable nutrient, which should be provided exogenously during artificial nutrition.