Molecular epidemiologic studies within the Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial (SELECT).

OBJECTIVE: To conduct timely epidemiologic investigations of molecular/genetic markers that may contribute to the development of prostate, lung, colorectal, or other cancers within the Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial (SELECT), and to evaluate interactions between these markers and the study interventions. METHODS: The epidemiologic studies within SELECT will be based on 32,400 men aged 55 years or older (age 50 or older for the African-American men) enrolled into an intergroup, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase III prevention trial of supplemental selenium and vitamin E developed and funded by the National Cancer Institute, and coordinated by the Southwest Oncology Group. During the 12-year study period approximately 1500-2000 cases of prostate cancer, 800 lung cancers, and 500 colon cancers are estimated to be diagnosed, based on data from the ongoing Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial of finasteride. A modified fasting blood sample will be processed to collect plasma for analysis of micronutrients, hormones, cytokines, and other proteins. Buffy-coat derived white blood cells collected at baseline will be used for isolation of DNA and establishment of immortalized cell lines. Red blood cells will be stored for analysis of hemoglobin adducts and other components. RESULTS: Specific results anticipated from these molecular studies will provide information on factors hypothesized to contribute to prostate cancer risk and that may modify the efficacy of either trial supplement, including: steroid sex hormones and several polymorphic genes that encode proteins affecting androgenic stimulation of the prostate, including the androgen receptor, steroid 5alpha-reductase type II, CYP17, and beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase; polymorphisms of DNA repair genes and carcinogen metabolism genes, including those involved in the activation of chemical carcinogens to reactive intermediates (e.g., CYP1A1) or the detoxification of reactive intermediates (e.g., glutathione S-transferase M1); DNA and protein adducts; and insulin-like growth factors and leptin. CONCLUSION: SELECT offers an excellent opportunity to conduct molecular epidemiologic investigations to assess gene-environment interactions and their role in prostate, lung, and colon carcinogenesis.

Comparative efficacy as antioxidants between ascorbic acid and epigallocatechin gallate on cells of two human lymphoblastoid lines.

Both ascorbic acid and epigallocatechin gallate, which is one of the key polyphenols contained in green tea leaves, have been considered excellent antioxidants. The present study compared the efficacy as antioxidants between the two agents on an equimolar basis. Cells of two lymphoid lines were used as test material to determine the reduction of chromosome damage induced by the radiomimetic antibiotic bleomycin. Without bleomycin, both agents, at concentrations of 10(-7), 10(-6), 10(-5), and 10(-4) M, showed chromosome damage similar to the untreated controls. With bleomycin, the weakest concentration of both showed no protective effect. At concentrations of 10(-6) and 10(-5) M, especially the latter, a significant reduction in frequencies of chromatid breaks was recorded. However, at the highest concentration, 10(-4) M, the chromatid break frequencies rose to the same level as that of cells treated with bleomycin alone, suggesting that both behaved like pro-oxidants.

Development of a database for assessing dietary phytoestrogen intake.

For the past two decades, epidemiologists have observed lower risks of lung, breast, prostate, colon, and other cancers in populations that frequently consume fruits and vegetables. Numerous phytoestrogens have been shown to be anticarcinogenic under experimental conditions and may account for at least part of the cancer-prevention effects of fruit and vegetable consumption. These plant constituents include isoflavonoids, coumestans, lignans, phytosterols, and flavonoids. DietSys, the nutrient analysis program associated with the National Cancer Institute Health Habits and History Questionnaire (HHHQ), and other nationally available nutrient analysis databases do not fully assess these constituents. Therefore, we modified DietSys to include these components in foods on the basis of published values. In addition, as part of an epidemiological study of prostate cancer, we modified the food-frequency component of the HHHQ to include the main foods contributing to phytoestrogen intake. Although there are limitations to the consistency and quality of many of the values because they were gathered from a variety of sources, our approach should provide a useful first tool for assessing the epidemiological association between phytoestrogen consumption and cancer risk. Furthermore, this work has already facilitated the identification of the major dietary contributors with phytoestrogen activity and prioritized future laboratory analyses of specific foods toward the development of a more complete and accurate database.

Phytoestrogen intake and prostate cancer: a case-control study using a new database.

In the last several years, attention has been focused on comparing the Western diet, which is rich in fat, protein, and refined carbohydrates, with the Asian diet, which is rich in phytoestrogens, as a possible explanation for the contrasting rates of clinically relevant prostate cancer. Phytoestrogens, plant-derived nutrients, include several isoflavones, flavonoids, lignans, phytosterols, and coumestans, some of which have been postulated as having anticarcinogenic properties. Using a new database, we examined the role of phytoestrogen intake and prostate cancer risk in 83 Caucasian cases and 107 controls. Controls reported consuming higher amounts of foods containing genistein, daidzein, and coumestrol and lower amounts of foods containing campesterol and stigmasterol. Multivariate analysis, after adjustment for age, family history of prostate cancer, alcohol consumption, and total calorie intake, showed an inverse association between coumestrol (p = 0.03) and daidzein (p = 0.07) and prostate cancer risk. Genistein, the most studied phytoestrogen, showed a slight protective effect (p = 0.26). However, a positive association was found between campesterol (p = 0.08) and stigmasterol (p = 0.03) and risk of prostate cancer. These results are suggestive of a possible relationship between phytoestrogen intake and prostate cancer risk. Larger comprehensive studies are needed to further refine the role of phytoestrogen intake in prostate cancer risk.

Correlates of mutagen sensitivity in patients with upper aerodigestive tract cancer.

Although tobacco and alcohol use are the major determinants of upper aerodigestive tract carcinogenesis, not all smokers develop cancer. This phenomenon is due to individual variation in genetic susceptibility to carcinogens. One explanation may be differences in mutagen sensitivity (as measured by the in vitro bleomycin-induced mutagen sensitivity assay) in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract. Antioxidant supplementation has also been shown to decrease DNA damage and thus may also inhibit carcinogenesis. In this study, we examined whether smoking, alcohol intake, and dietary antioxidant intake were correlated with mutagen sensitivity. The 612 patients evaluated are part of an ongoing multicenter Phase III trial of 13-cis retinoic acid for the prevention of second primary tumors. We found that patients with pharyngeal cancers were more likely than patients with oral cavity or larynx cancers to be mutagen sensitive. There were no significant differences in the distribution of mutagen sensitivity by sex or alcohol use. Never smokers were significantly more likely (61.1%) to be mutagen sensitive than current smokers (35.6%). Dietary consumption of the micronutrients alpha-carotene, beta-carotene, lutein, lycopene, and vitamin C was not correlated with mutagen sensitivity. Therefore, we suggest that mutagen sensitivity is an independent marker of cancer risk not affected by other known risk factors.

A clinical trial to evaluate the effect of vitamin C supplementation on in vitro mutagen sensitivity. The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Clinical Community Oncology Program Network.

Mutagen sensitivity, as measured by an in vitro assay, has been described as a risk factor for the development of several tobacco-related epithelial cancers. In vitro studies have indicated that sensitivity to the clastogenic effects of bleomycin on chromosomes was reduced with the introduction of ascorbic acid in a dose-dependent relationship. We report the results of a randomized clinical trial to determine whether increasing levels of oral ascorbic acid could reduce the levels of mutagen sensitivity. For this study, we recruited 228 healthy smokers from 21 centers around the country through the Clinical Community Oncology Program. Each individual was randomly assigned to one of four daily regimens: placebo, 1 g of ascorbic acid, 2 g of ascorbic acid, or 4 g of ascorbic acid. Treatments were administered for 16 weeks. Assessment of mutagen sensitivity was made at baseline and at weeks 4, 16, and 20 (4 weeks after cessation of treatment). Serum ascorbic acid levels were measured at baseline and at weeks 4 and 16. Demographic and risk factor data were collected at baseline and at each-measurement point. Analyses measured the differences of mutagen sensitivity levels across the four treatment arms, as well as investigating the correlation between serum ascorbic acid level and mutagen sensitivity levels in individuals. We did not find a dose-response relationship between ascorbic acid intake and mutagen sensitivity. Additionally, we did not find an association between serum ascorbic acid levels and mutagen sensitivity.

The development of a comprehensive, institution-based patient risk evaluation program: I. Development, content, and data management.

There is a need for standardization of risk factor questionnaires for epidemiological research. This paper describes the development and implementation of a comprehensive cancer risk evaluation program at the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center. A detailed self-administered questionnaire is given to all newly registered adult patients. The format of the instrument, coding systems, quality control measures, and data entry mechanisms are discussed. The criteria for the choice of a data base management system are outlined. The identification of high-risk patient subgroups is possible, and it is feasible to link this data base with clinical and biochemical data. There is considerable potential for collaborative research using this risk evaluation program, bringing together basic scientists, clinicians, and epidemiologists.

The development of a comprehensive, institution-based patient risk evaluation program: II. Validity and reliability of questionnaire data.

The accuracy of historical information derived from self-administered questionnaires must be confirmed. We report the results of studies conducted to assess the reliability and validity of data collected from a comprehensive cancer risk factor questionnaire developed at The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center. A comparison of the basic demographic data of a randomly selected sample of 80 respondents and 70 nonrespondents revealed no fundamental ethnic or socioeconomic differences. We verified self-reported past illnesses, surgical procedures, and cancers by reviewing 72 patient charts, using stringent diagnostic criteria for verification. We noted substantial agreement between self-reported and documented illnesses and operations. With the exception of nine patients who misclassified metastatic disease, the verification of primary cancers was excellent. We determined reliability by interviewing 50 of these patients by telephone. Questions with a dichotomous outcome (e.g., smoking status) were reliably answered; however, those requiring quantification (e.g., amount of alcohol consumed) were less accurately reported on interview. While we recognize the limitations of self-administered questionnaires, we believe this program will develop into a comprehensive, standardized, easily accessible patient risk factor data base.