Acceptability of the routine use and collection of a generic patient reported outcome measure from the perspective of healthcare staff: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) provide a measure of self-perceived health status or health-related quality of life. They have been used to support provider-patient decisions, healthcare delivery, and value-based healthcare models. A barrier to routine collection of PROMs is the perception that PROMs lack clinical utility. As such, it is important to establish clinicians' acceptability of the PROM prior to large-scale implementation. This study explored the acceptability of the routine use and collection of a generic PROM in healthcare services from the perspective of healthcare staff. METHODS: Individual semi-structured interviews were completed from September 2020 to March 2021 with 26 staff from two multi-disciplinary community healthcare services in Melbourne, Australia. Interviews explored their experiences of using the EQ-5D-5L in their routine care. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were analysed according to a framework approach, using inductive and deductive techniques. RESULTS: Participants discussed the acceptability of the EQ-5D-5L with reference to four themes: practicalities of use; holistic nature; influence on client care; and influence on health service. Participants found the EQ-5D-5L quick and easy to administer, and appreciated that it measured multiple domains of health that were relevant to their clients' care. They believed the EQ-5D-5L helped to identify client problems, and inform service delivery. They also reported features that were less acceptable, including a lack of item specificity to some healthcare disciplines. Participants reported the challenge of managing conflict between their assessment of the client's health and the client's perspective of their own health, leading some to question whether the client could provide an accurate reflection of their own health. CONCLUSIONS: The EQ-5D-5L has several features that healthcare staff viewed as acceptable for routine collection and use in healthcare. Training on the validity of the patient reported perspective and broadening the scope of PROMs collection beyond the EQ-5D-5L should be considered to facilitate large-scale implementation.

Where do low risk women live relative to maternity services across Victoria? Expanding access to public homebirth models across Victoria.

PROBLEM: Currently <1% of Australian women give birth at home. BACKGROUND: In Australia there are very few options for women to access public funded homebirth. AIM: We aimed to use geo-mapping to identify the number of women eligible for homebirth in Victoria, based on the criteria of uncomplicated pregnancies and residing within 15-25kms of suitable maternity services, to plan future maternity care options. METHODS: Retrospective study of births between 2015 and 2017 in Victoria, Australia. All women who were identified as having a low risk pregnancy at the beginning of pregnancy were included. The number of women within 15 and 25km of a suitable Victorian public maternity hospital and catchment boundaries around each hospital were determined. FINDINGS: Between 2015 and 2017, 126,830 low risk women gave birth in Victoria, of whom half live within 25km of seven Victorian hospitals. Currently, 2% of suitable women who live close to the current public homebirth models accessed them. DISCUSSION: We present a method to inform the expansion of maternity service options using Victoria as an example. On the basis of the maximum number of low risk women living close by, we have also identified the Victorian maternity services that would be most suitable for creation of public homebirth or low risk continuity of midwifery models. CONCLUSION: This approach could can be used to plan other maternity care services.

Effect of vitamin D supplementation on measures of arterial stiffness: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Low vitamin D has been associated with poor arterial compliance in observational studies. Arterial stiffness has prognostic value for cardiovascular disease risk. The aim of this systematic review was to clarify the literature surrounding the use of vitamin D to ameliorate arterial stiffness. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of the MEDLINE, Scopus and EMBASE databases for randomized controlled clinical trials investigating the effect of vitamin D supplementation on pulse wave velocity (PWV) and/or augmentation index (AI) as indicators of arterial stiffness. We meta-analysed data and calculated standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using inverse-variance models on RevMan v5.3 software. Study quality was assessed using a modified Jadad scale. RESULTS: A total of 607 unique records were identified, of which 18 satisfied our inclusion and exclusion criteria. Study quality was high, ranging from 9 to 12 (of 13). Study design in terms of vitamin D dosing protocol (range: 1000-5700 IU/day), follow-up times (range: 1-12 months), sample size (range: n = 29-183) and recruitment strategies varied markedly. Thirteen studies had data for meta-analysis. Vitamin D was associated with nonsignificant reductions in PWV [SMD = -0·10; 95% CI: -0·24, 0·04; P = 0·17; n = 806 from ten studies] and AI [-0·15; -0·32, 0·02; 0·08; n = 551 from eight studies]. DISCUSSION: There is inconsistent evidence to suggest that vitamin D supplementation improves indicators of arterial stiffness. This may be attributable to the heterogeneity in study design. Therefore, large and well-designed randomized studies are required to determine the casual relationships between vitamin D and arterial stiffness and cardiovascular risk.