When does atopic dermatitis warrant systemic therapy? Recommendations from an expert panel of the International Eczema Council.

BACKGROUND: Although most patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) are effectively managed with topical medication, a significant minority require systemic therapy. Guidelines for decision making about advancement to systemic therapy are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To guide those considering use of systemic therapy in AD and provide a framework for evaluation before making this therapeutic decision with the patient. METHODS: A subgroup of the International Eczema Council determined aspects to consider before prescribing systemic therapy. Topics were assigned to expert reviewers who performed a topic-specific literature review, referred to guidelines when available, and provided interpretation and expert opinion. RESULTS: We recommend a systematic and holistic approach to assess patients with severe signs and symptoms of AD and impact on quality of life before systemic therapy. Steps taken before commencing systemic therapy include considering alternate or concomitant diagnoses, avoiding trigger factors, optimizing topical therapy, ensuring adequate patient/caregiver education, treating coexistent infection, assessing the impact on quality of life, and considering phototherapy. LIMITATIONS: Our work is a consensus statement, not a systematic review. CONCLUSION: The decision to start systemic medication should include assessment of severity and quality of life while considering the individual's general health status, psychologic needs, and personal attitudes toward systemic therapies.

Outpatient Home-based Wet Wrap Dressings with Topical Steroids with Children with Severe Recalcitrant Atopic Dermatitis: A Feasibility Pilot Study.

Wet wrapping (WW) appears to be effective in severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in children resistant to topical treatment. Seventeen children were included and were directed to use WW every night (≥6 hr) until lesions disappeared, followed by maintenance treatment of two to three treatments per week. The mean Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) score at baseline was 48.9. After 1 month of treatment the mean SCORAD score was 18.9, and efficacy was maintained after 3 months of treatment. The majority of patients were satisfied (91.7%) with the WW treatment; 92% considered it to be much more effective than the previous treatments received. WW was easy to perform for 75% of patients, 83% of patients stated that it was better tolerated, and 17% considered it to be tolerated equally to dermatologic corticosteroids without WW. The home WW program was continued on a maintenance basis for 75% of patients. This open-label study showed that this program was a feasible and well-tolerated alternative for the treatment of severe, refractory AD in children and adolescents.

Treatment refusal among patients with psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: Treatment refusal, which is defined as a patient actively refusing to take treatment despite physician recommendations, has never been evaluated in psoriasis. OBJECTIVE: To investigate refusal of topical treatments by patients living with psoriasis in France. METHODS: Using responses to an internet study, participants who refused topical treatment (n = 50) were compared to those who applied topical treatment (n = 205). Participants undergoing phototherapy, biotherapy, and oral treatment were excluded. Spearman rank correlations completed by Fisher's exact tests and Student's t-tests were performed. RESULTS: Comorbidities, localization of lesions, and symptoms associated with psoriasis were not significant predictors of treatment refusal. Compared to patients who accepted treatment, more patients who refused treatment believed that psoriasis is not manageable (80.0% versus 61.5%; p = 0.01), that psoriasis treatments never work (58.0% versus 27.5%; OR: 2.09 p < 0.0001), and that all creams have the same effects (54.0% versus 31.7%; OR: 1.7, p = 0.003). Among patients who reported seeking medical attention from physicians, more patients in the treatment refusal group reported some level of dissatisfaction with their relationship with their physician than in the treatment acceptance group. LIMITATIONS: The validity of the self-reported treatment refusal could not be evaluated. CONCLUSION: Treatment refusal is an important element to be taken into consideration in the management of psoriasis.

Quality of life of parents living with a child suffering from atopic dermatitis before and after a 3-month treatment with an emollient.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) can be extremely disabling and may cause psychological problems for affected children and their families. Moisturizers and emollients are important in the baseline daily skin care of patients with AD. To assess the effect of a 3-month, twice-daily treatment with an emollient on the quality of life (QoL) of parents with a child with mild to moderate AD (SCORing Atopic Dermatitis [SCORAD] ≤ 30, a multicenter open trial was performed by eight dermatologists on 191 volunteers. Evaluation by the dermatologist of the child's clinical condition (SCORAD) and of the efficacy and overall safety of the treatment was associated with a QoL questionnaire completed by one parent of the atopic child. A self-assessment of the global QoL and of the efficacy and overall safety was also performed. During the study, mean SCORAD dropped from 28 to 12 (p < 0.001), with good improvement in skin dryness and pruritus criteria. At the same time, the self-assessment of the global parent QoL scores dropped from 4.4 to 2.1 (p < 0.001) with 60%, 48% and 79% favorable parent opinions regarding wellbeing or improvement of the health condition, quality of sleep, and efficacy of the emollient, respectively. This trial revealed the efficacy of the product in improving parent QoL (85% of parents noted improvement in QoL), and its global safety was considered to be very good or good, with 80% favorable opinions in parents' declarative judgements and dermatologists' assessments. The emollient evaluated improves the course of AD and can improve the QoL of patients and their families.

Symptomatic acquired zinc deficiency in at-risk premature infants: high dose preventive supplementation is necessary.

Zinc is a cofactor for several enzymes involved in many metabolisms. Zinc deficiency induces various disorders such as acrodermatitis enteropathica, either inherited or acquired. We report three cases of premature infants (24-31 wks gestational age) with low birthweight (650 to 940 g) and enteropathy, two of whom presented with necrotizing enterocolitis. All infants were fed by total parenteral nutrition. At a chronological age ranging from 73 to 80 days, all infants developed a periorificial dermatitis. Before the onset of the first signs, they had received zinc supplementation ranging from 146% to 195% of the recommended dose (400 microg/kg/day). Increased zinc supplementation over a course of 6-18 days induced a complete resolution of symptoms in all cases. No abnormality in the neurologic examination and no recurrence were observed at the end of the zinc treatment. Low birthweight premature infants with enteropathy on total parenteral nutrition are at risk of developing zinc deficiency. The usual recommended zinc supplementation is probably insufficient for those infants. A delay in the diagnosis of zinc deficiency may lead to severe complications.