Moon phases and moon signs do not influence morbidity, mortality and long-term survival, after living donor kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 11% of the German population are convinced that certain moon phases and moon signs may impact their health and the onset and clinical course of diseases. Before elective surgery, a considerable number of patients look to optimize the timing of the procedure based on the lunar cycle. Especially patients awaiting living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) commonly look for an adjustment of the date of transplantation according to the moon calendar. This study therefore investigated the perioperative and long-term outcome of LDKT dependent on moon phases and zodiac signs. METHODS: Patient data were prospectively collected in a continuously updated kidney transplant database. Two hundred and seventy-eight consecutive patients who underwent LDKT between 1994 and December 2009 were selected for the study and retrospectively assigned to the four moon phases (new-moon, waxing-moon, full-moon, and waning-moon) and the corresponding zodiac sign (moon sign Libra), based on the date of transplantation. Preexisting comorbidities, perioperative mortality, surgical outcome, and long-term survival data were analyzed. RESULTS: Of all LDKT procedures, 11.9, 39.9, 11.5, and 36.5% were performed during the new, waxing, full, and waning moon, respectively, and 6.2% during the moon sign Libra, which is believed to interfere with renal surgery. Survival rates at 1, 5, and 10 years after transplantation were 98.9, 92, and 88.7% (patient survival) and 97.4, 91.6, and 80.6% (graft survival) without any differences between all groups of lunar phases and moon signs. Overall perioperative complications and early graft loss occurred in 21.2 and 1.4%, without statistical difference (p > 0.05) between groups. CONCLUSION: Moon phases and the moon sign Libra had no impact on early and long-term outcome measures following LDKT in our study. Thus, concerns of patients awaiting LDKT regarding the ideal time of surgery can be allayed, and surgery may be scheduled independently of the lunar phases.

Near-infrared spectroscopy based neurofeedback training increases specific motor imagery related cortical activation compared to sham feedback.

In the present study we implemented a real-time feedback system based on multichannel near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS). Prior studies indicated that NIRS-based neurofeedback can enhance motor imagery related cortical activation. To specify these prior results and to confirm the efficacy of NIRS-based neurofeedback, we examined changes in blood oxygenation level collected in eight training sessions. One group got real feedback about their own brain activity (N=9) and one group saw a playback of another person's feedback recording (N=8). All participants performed motor imagery of a right hand movement. Real neurofeedback induced specific and focused brain activation over left motor areas. This focal brain activation became even more specific over the eight training sessions. In contrast, sham feedback led to diffuse brain activation patterns over the whole cortex. These findings can be useful when training patients with focal brain lesions to increase activity of specific brain areas for rehabilitation purpose.

Periarterial application of papaverine during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy improves early graft function after kidney transplantation in pigs.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) increases incentives to donation by subjects who might refuse an open operation. However, the incidence of delayed graft function is higher after LDN than after open operation. This may be caused by the reduction of renal perfusion as a result of the raised intraabdominal pressure and mechanically induced renal angiospasm during the operation. We conducted experiments to find out whether the application of papaverine around the renal artery during LDN could improve early graft function after transplantation. METHODS: Renal function was studied in 10 male pigs (weight approximately 25 kg). The left kidney was harvested laparoscopically (intraabdominal pressure 8 mmHg). Five animals were randomly selected to have perivascular application of 50 mg papaverine (treatment group) before preparation of the vessels. In controls no papaverine was used. After LDN and open right nephrectomy the left kidney was autotransplanted. The main outcome measures were volume of urine produced and creatinine clearance during the first 20 h after the transplant. RESULTS: The groups were comparable in respect of body weight, hemodynamic values, amount of infusions, warm and cold ischemia time, and duration of anastomosis. Urine output and creatinine clearance were significantly higher in pigs treated with papaverine than in controls. CONCLUSIONS: Papaverine substantially improved early graft function in pigs when applied around the renal artery during LDN. Whether this is applicable to procurement of human kidneys remains to be evaluated.

The influence of periarterial papaverine application on intraoperative renal function and blood flow during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy in a pig model.

BACKGROUND: The transplantation of live donor kidneys harvested laparoscopically is associated with a higher incidence of delayed graft function than the transplantation of grafts harvested via the open technique. The delay is believed to be due to a decrease in renal blood flow during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN). The aim of this study was to evaluate whether renal function and blood perfusion can be enhanced by the periarterial application of papaverine during LDN. METHODS: Renal function and blood flow were studied in a porcine model that included a total of 24 pigs (20-30 kg). In 12 of the pigs, urine output and creatinine clearance were determined as measures of renal function. In the other 12 pigs, renal blood flow was determined using fluorescent-labeled microspheres. In each group, the pigs were randomized into two subgroups, one with and one without a perivascular injection of 50 mg papaverine. RESULTS: As compared to the controls, the animals receiving papaverine had a significantly higher urine output (3.1 +/- 1.6 vs 0.9 +/- 0.45 ml/h/kg; p = 0.02), superior creatinine clearance (2.22 +/- 0.5 vs 0.95 +/- 0.1 ml/min/kg; p = 0.038), and enhanced renal blood flow (4.9 +/- 2.2 vs 2.1 +/- 0.8 ml/min/g; p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: When applied to the tissue surrounding the renal artery, papaverine substantially improves renal function and blood flow during laparoscopic live kidney donation. Whether graft optimization during kidney procurement also translates into improved posttransplantation function remains to be established.