Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Cardiovasc Ther ; 2020: 1494506, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33072188

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cardiac adverse events are common among patients presenting with acute stroke and contribute to overall morbidity and mortality. Prophylactic measures for the reduction of cardiac adverse events in hospitalized stroke patients have not been well understood. We sought to investigate the effect of early initiation of high-dose intravenous magnesium sulfate on cardiac adverse events in stroke patients. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of the prehospital Field Administration of Stroke Therapy-Magnesium (FAST-MAG) randomized phase-3 clinical trial, conducted from 2005-2013. Consecutive patients with suspected acute stroke and a serum magnesium level within 72 hours of enrollment were selected. Twenty grams of magnesium sulfate or placebo was administered in the ambulance starting with a 15-minute loading dose intravenous infusion followed by a 24-hour maintenance infusion in the hospital. RESULTS: Among 1126 patients included in the analysis of this study, 809 (71.8%) patients had ischemic stroke, 277 (24.6%) had hemorrhagic stroke, and 39 (3.5%) with stroke mimics. The mean age was 69.5 (SD13.4) and 42% were female. 565 (50.2%) received magnesium treatment, and 561 (49.8%) received placebo. 254 (22.6%) patients achieved the target, and 872 (77.4%) did not achieve the target, regardless of their treatment group. Among 1126 patients, 159 (14.1%) had at least one CAE. Treatment with magnesium was not associated with fewer cardiac adverse events. A multivariate binary logistic regression for predictors of CAEs showed a positive association of older age and frequency of CAEs (R = 1.04, 95% CI 1.03-1.06, p < 0.0001). Measures of early and 90-day outcomes did not differ significantly between the magnesium and placebo groups among patients who had CAEs. CONCLUSION: Treatment of acute stroke patients with magnesium did not result in a reduction in the number or severity of cardiac serious adverse events.


Asunto(s)
Cardiopatías/prevención & control , Hospitalización , Sulfato de Magnesio/administración & dosificación , Accidente Cerebrovascular/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración Intravenosa , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Comorbilidad , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Cardiopatías/diagnóstico , Cardiopatías/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Los Angeles/epidemiología , Sulfato de Magnesio/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
J Neuroimaging ; 28(6): 676-682, 2018 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30010229

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Endovascular therapy (ET) has become the standard of care for selected patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to large vessel occlusion (LVO). However, many LVO or medium vessel occlusion (MVO) patients are ineligible for ET, including some who harbor salvageable tissues. To develop complementary therapies for these patients, it is important to delineate their prevalence, clinical features, and outcomes. METHODS: In a prospectively maintained database, we reviewed consecutive AIS patients between December 2015 and September 2016. Based on the first multimodal computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging, patients were categorized as having substantial penumbra if perfusion lesion volume (Tmax >6 seconds) exceeded ischemic core volume (relative cerebral blood flow <30% on CT perfusion or apparent diffusion coefficient <620 on diffusion weighted image) by ≥20%. RESULTS: Among 174 consecutive AIS patients presenting within 24 hours of last known well time, 29 (17%) had LVO or MVO and substantial penumbra, but were deemed ET ineligible. Among these patients, mean age was 81 (±13), 45% were female, and median National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score was 11 (interquartile range [IQR]: 5-19). The most common reasons for not pursuing ET were: distal occlusion (28%), mild neurologic deficit (16%), and temporally advanced core injury (16%). Ischemic core volume was 20 mL (±31), penumbral volume was 54 mL (±63), and mismatch ratio median was 5.6 (IQR: 2-infinite). Severe disability or death at discharge (modified Rankin scale: 4-6) occurred in 72% of the patients. CONCLUSION: Even in the modern stent retriever era, 1 in 6 AIS patients presents with substantial penumbra judged not appropriate for ET. This population may benefit from the development of alternative therapies, including collateral enhancement, neuroprotection, and thrombectomy devices deployable in distal arteries.


Asunto(s)
Isquemia Encefálica/diagnóstico por imagen , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagen , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Circulación Cerebrovascular/fisiología , Femenino , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA