RESUMEN
The most suitable approach to the athletes with WPW is controversial. Therefore 66 symptom-free athletes with WPW and without heart disease (53 M, 13 F, mean age 21.98 yrs, min 12--max 44) underwent a study protocol whose end-point was the induction of supraventricular tachyarrhythmia, i.e. atrial fibrillation or, if not possible, atrial flutter or atrial tachycardia at rest and during ergometric stress test. The athletes with shortest R-R interval between preexcited beats less than or equal to 240 ms at rest and/or less than or equal to 210 ms during exercise were judged as being at risk i.e. no fit for sport activity. The end-point was reached in 64/66 athletes (in 62 atrial fibrillation). In 4 athletes with life threatening arrhythmia induced at rest the evaluation during exercise was not performed. According to the evaluation at rest we were able to identify only 18 athletes (28.1%) as being at risk, while according to the complete study protocol 26 athletes (40.6%) were judged as such. In 23/64 athletes (36%) this judgement was discordant with the usual non invasive evaluation (i.e. Holter monitoring, ergometric stress test, ajmaline test). During induced atrial fibrillation no significant difference, was found between the percentage of preexcited beats at rest and during exercise. On the average, 40 min. are required for performance of this study protocol (if the induced arrhythmia lasts less than 5 min.). According to our results we conclude: a) the non invasive assessment of the WPW athletes is unsatisfactory; b) the induction of atrial fibrillation during exercise gives a remarkable increase of the diagnostic power with respect to the assessment only at rest; c) since it is simple to perform and not expensive (in time, staff and cost) and because of its high diagnostic yield, we regard this protocol as fundamental for the electrophysiological evaluation of WPW athletes and also suitable for systematic study of WPW patients.